Netherlands - EredivisieData current as of 11 September 2026

PSV vs NEC: match statistics

PSV crest
PSV
2 : 3half-time 1:2
NEC crest
NEC
165%(1.44)
X20%(4.98)
215%(5.50)

As the league leader, PSV presents dominant form at home, winning 77% of their home fixtures and scoring an average of 3.15 goals per game. The hosts boast an impressive +23 goal difference in home matches along with a high ball possession rate (63%). NEC, despite occupying 3rd place in the table, has not kept a single clean sheet on the road all season and concedes an average of 1.77 goals per away match. The gap in offensive quality (xG: 2.25 for PSV vs 1.91 for NEC) and defensive solidity (xGA: 1.12 vs 1.32) speaks in favor of the hosts. The recent form of both teams (PSV: 1.8 PPG, NEC: 1.6 PPG) and PSV's advantage in shooting efficiency (16% vs 14%) further reinforce the prediction of a victory for the leaders. However, NEC's high away draw percentage (38%) justifies a moderate probability of an upset.

PSV vs NEC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

PSV played NEC in Eredivisie (Netherlands). The match was played on 14 March 2026. Final score: 2:3.

Current form

PSV: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. NEC: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

PSV scores 2.88 and concedes 1.19 goals per match. NEC scores 2.46 and concedes 1.65. League average: 3.19 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: PSV 73%, NEC 81%. Over 2.5: PSV 85%, NEC 81%. League level: BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 62%.

xG, shots and style

PSV has higher xG: 2.09 vs 1.91. PSV: 18.0 shots per match, NEC: 16.3.

Match halves

PSV: half-time lead 58%, second-half goals 1.31. NEC: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 1.58.

Goals by minute

PSV: 16-30 (15 goals). NEC: 76-90+ (15 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Eredivisie: 3.19 goals per match, BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 62%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 8.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

As the league leader, PSV presents dominant form at home, winning 77% of their home fixtures and scoring an average of 3.15 goals per game. The hosts boast an impressive +23 goal difference in home matches along with a high ball possession rate (63%). NEC, despite occupying 3rd place in the table, has not kept a single clean sheet on the road all season and concedes an average of 1.77 goals per away match. The gap in offensive quality (xG: 2.25 for PSV vs 1.91 for NEC) and defensive solidity (xGA: 1.12 vs 1.32) speaks in favor of the hosts. The recent form of both teams (PSV: 1.8 PPG, NEC: 1.6 PPG) and PSV's advantage in shooting efficiency (16% vs 14%) further reinforce the prediction of a victory for the leaders. However, NEC's high away draw percentage (38%) justifies a moderate probability of an upset.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

70Possession (%)30
PSVNEC
12Shots17
PSVNEC
6Shots on target6
PSVNEC
1.65xG1.78
PSVNEC
7Corners7
PSVNEC
64Dangerous attacks39
PSVNEC
8Fouls12
PSVNEC
0Cards3
PSVNEC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.88Goals scored / match2.46
PSVNEC
1.19Goals conceded / match1.65
PSVNEC
61%Average possession58%
PSVNEC
7.27Shots on target / match6.73
PSVNEC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

18Shots per match16.27
PSVNEC
7.27Shots on target6.73
PSVNEC
16%Shot conversion15.1%
PSVNEC
61%Possession58%
PSVNEC
2.09xG for1.91
PSVNEC
1.24xG against1.31
PSVNEC

Shooting quality

PSV: DominantNEC: Dominant
PSVNEC
Accuracy (shots on target)40%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

PSV is 140% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / match - PSV · 1 pts / match - NEC

PSV
WLWWW
Season result split
85% W8% D8% L
Season (W-D-L)
22-2-2
2.62 pts / match · goal difference +44
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
10-2-1
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WDWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 2.31Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
NEC
LDDLW
Season result split
50% W27% D23% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-7-6
1.77 pts / match · goal difference +21
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-5-3
Last 5 away
2-3-0
DWWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 2.26Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

PSV is 17% better for: goals scored per match.

2.88 goals / match - PSV · 2.46 goals / match - NEC

PSV is 39% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.19 goals / match - PSV · 1.65 goals / match - NEC

PSV scoring profile: very strong

PSV scores in 96% of matches (25 of 26 matches), while NEC keeps a clean sheet in 15% (4 of 26 matches).

NEC scoring profile: very strong

NEC scores in 96% of matches (25 of 26 matches), while PSV keeps a clean sheet in 23% (6 of 26 matches).

75Goals scored (season)64
PSVNEC
31Goals conceded (season)43
PSVNEC
4.08Average goals in match4.12
PSVNEC
11Goals scored (last 5)8
PSVNEC
6Goals conceded (last 5)8
PSVNEC

How often they score at least...

96%1 goal96%
PSVNEC
88%2 goals81%
PSVNEC
50%3 goals46%
PSVNEC
31%4 goals19%
PSVNEC

How often they concede at least...

77%1 goal85%
PSVNEC
35%2 goals46%
PSVNEC
8%3 goals27%
PSVNEC
0%4 goals4%
PSVNEC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

42%BTTS at half-time50%
PSVNEC
15%BTTS in both halves31%
PSVNEC
69%Scored in both halves69%
PSVNEC

BTTS and goal count

73%Min. 3 goals and BTTS69%
PSVNEC
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS12%
PSVNEC
100%BTTS - last 580%
PSVNEC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

96%Min. 1 goal before half-time92%
PSVNEC
69%Min. 2 goals before half-time58%
PSVNEC
35%Min. 3 goals before half-time23%
PSVNEC

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time96%
PSVNEC
54%Min. 2 goals after half-time77%
PSVNEC
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time35%
PSVNEC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

PSV is 45% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / match - PSV · 1.38 pts / match - NEC

PSV - half-time state
58% leading27% draw15% trailing
NEC - half-time state
35% leading35% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)1.38
PSVNEC
1.58Goals scored (1st half)0.88
PSVNEC
0.58Goals conceded (1st half)0.88
PSVNEC
2.15Average goals (1st half)1.77
PSVNEC
46%Clean sheet before half-time31%
PSVNEC
15%No goal before half-time27%
PSVNEC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.96Points per match (2nd half)1.85
PSVNEC
1.31Goals scored (2nd half)1.58
PSVNEC
0.62Goals conceded (2nd half)0.77
PSVNEC
1.92Average goals (2nd half)2.35
PSVNEC
58%Clean sheet after half-time42%
PSVNEC
19%No goal after half-time8%
PSVNEC

PSV - second-half results

54% W35% D12% L
52
Half-time points
41
Half-time goals
+26
Goal difference (1st half)
51
Second-half points
+18
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding147%

Leads at half-time in 58% of matches and wins 85%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

NEC - second-half results

46% W46% D8% L
36
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
48
Second-half points
+21
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding143%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

PSV - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.80
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
NEC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.41.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

PSV
ScoredConceded
13
3
0-15
15
3
16-30
13
9
31-45
11
3
46-60
9
8
61-75
14
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (15 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

NEC
ScoredConceded
8
5
0-15
6
6
16-30
9
12
31-45
14
9
46-60
12
6
61-75
15
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

4.09
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.3 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
128%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
77%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+95%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
92%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

PSV

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.85
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.84
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.79
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
164%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

NEC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.60
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.55
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.34
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
172%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.77
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eredivisie).

Teams vs league

PSVLigaNEC
Average goals in match 4.083.19 4.12
Both teams scored 73%65% 81%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 85%62% 81%
Clean sheets 23%19% 15%
Goal before half-time 96%81% 92%
Goal after half-time 88%85% 96%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.19
Average goals per match
65%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
1.76
Home goals / match
1.43
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
55%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. NECYellow cardDarko Nejašmić
  2. NECSubstitutionOn: Bram NuytinckOff: Jetro Willems
  3. NECSubstitutionOn: Youssef El KachatiOff: Sami Ouaissa
  4. PSVSubstitutionOn: Couhaib DriouechOff: Ricardo Pepi
  5. PSVSubstitutionOn: Esmir BajraktarevicOff: Dennis Man
  6. NECYellow cardKodai Sano
  7. NECSubstitutionOn: Dirk ProperOff: Bryan Linssen
  8. PSVSubstitutionOn: Noah FernandezOff: Paul Wanner
  9. NECYellow cardBram Nuytinck

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Joey KooijMatches officiated: 18
2.89Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 244%Home wins33%Draws22%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: PSV 1 - 0 - 0 NEC. Average goals 8.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Nijmegen Eendracht Combinatie
3 : 5
PSV Eindhoven

FAQ

What was the result of PSV vs NEC?

The Eredivisie match finished PSV 2:3 NEC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before PSV vs NEC?

PSV score 2.88 goals per game on average and NEC 2.46. The Eredivisie average is 3.19 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 73% of PSV's matches and 81% of NEC's.

What form are PSV and NEC in?

Over the last 5 games PSV have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and NEC 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PSV vs NEC?

The statistical background for PSV vs NEC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.