Pyunik vs Artsakh: match statistics
Pyunik vs Artsakh: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Pyunik played Artsakh in Armenian Premier League (Armenia). The match was played on 23 May 2026. Venue: Yerevan Football Academy. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Pyunik: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Artsakh: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Pyunik scores 1.40 and concedes 0.68 goals per match. Artsakh scores 2.24 and concedes 0.76. League average: 2.58 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Pyunik 36%, Artsakh 40%. Over 2.5: Pyunik 36%, Artsakh 56%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 47%.
xG, shots and style
Artsakh has higher xG: 1.80 vs 1.57. Pyunik: 13.8 shots per match, Artsakh: 15.9.
Match halves
Pyunik: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 0.80. Artsakh: half-time lead 60%, second-half goals 1.24.
Goals by minute
Pyunik: 61-75 (8 goals). Artsakh: 76-90+ (17 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Armenian Premier League: 2.58 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 47%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win ("1") because Pyunik win 82% of matches at home, average 1.91 goals per game and have a home xG of 1.80, while Artsakh win 55% of away matches and have an away xG of 1.64. Artsakh hold a clear season-long advantage in finishing — 56 goals scored versus Pyunik’s 35 — and have an impressive 20 goals in the last 5 matches (4.0 per game) compared to the hosts’ 6 goals (1.2 per game). Defenses are statistically similar: Pyunik concede 0.64 goals on average at home, Artsakh 0.55 away, with clean sheets in 55% of Pyunik’s home games and 64% of Artsakh’s away games. Additionally Pyunik score very consistently at home — failing to score in only 9% of matches — whereas the visitors fail to score in 27% of away games, which gives the hosts an edge in offensive reliability. Considering greater scoring certainty and higher home xG, but also the visitors’ strong start and better recent points average (2.6 for Artsakh vs 2.0 for Pyunik), I assess the probabilities as: 45% Pyunik win, 25% draw and 30% Artsakh win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistics favor the 'no' scenario (BTTS - No): Pyunik kept a clean sheet in 50% of matches this season, Artsakh in 64%, and in the league as a whole 65% of games end with one team keeping a clean sheet. Pyunik score 2.50 goals per home match on average with xG 1.93, but conceded only 2 goals in the last 5 games (0.4 per match), indicating strong defensive form. Artsakh average 1.91 goals this season, however in the last 5 matches they scored 20 goals (4.0 per match) while conceding 6 (1.2 per match), giving a mixed offensive vs defensive signal. xG comparison shows: Pyunik xG_for 1.93 with average xG against for hosts 0.9, and Artsakh xG_for 1.64 with average xG against for guests 0.99 — both teams create chances, but the dominance of clean sheets (50% vs 64%) and the low seasonal BTTS for the away side (27%) favor No Goal. In summary, given the 50% and 64% clean sheets, the league tendency to clean sheets (65%) and the relatively low seasonal BTTS for the visitors (27%), I assign 65% to 'no' and 35% to 'yes'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I forecast Over 1.5 with ~90% probability, because Pyunik’s season rate for matches over 1.5 goals is 86% and Artsakh’s is 82%, which strongly signals at least two goals. An xG-based model (Pyunik xG_for 1.93 vs Artsakh defense xG_against 0.99; Artsakh xG_for 1.64 vs Pyunik defense xG_against 0.90) yields expected goals of ~1.46 for the home side and ~1.27 for the away side, totaling 2.73 expected goals. A baseline Poisson model with λ=2.73 gives ~51% chance for Over 2.5, but season Over 2.5 rates (Pyunik 64%, Artsakh 45%) and Artsakh’s last 5 matches (20 goals, 4.0 average) push my Over 2.5 estimate to ~63%. At the same time Artsakh’s defensive parameters (on average 0.55 goals conceded this season and 64% clean sheets) reduce the probability of an extremely high scoreline, so I rate Over 3.5 at ~31% and recommend playing Over 1.5 as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Pyunik holds an offensive edge and higher-quality chances: averaging 2.5 goals scored per match versus Artsakh’s 1.91, xG 1.93 versus 1.64, and more shots (16.86 vs 14.73) and shots on target (6.29 vs 5.36), indicating greater control of play. At Half-Time the hosts lead frequently — Pyunik led in 9 of 14 home matches (64%) and averaged 1.21 goals by the break, while Artsakh led in 6 of 11 away games (55%) with 0.73 goals at half-time; these figures favor Pyunik taking the lead at the break. At the same time, the visitors keep a clean sheet at half-time in 82% of away fixtures and concede only 0.55 goals per away match on average, so the home advantage may not be overwhelming, increasing the probability of a draw in certain scenarios. In second halves Pyunik scores 1.29 goals on average and Artsakh 1.18, and the home side has 86% of matches with at least one goal after the break, which suggests that if Pyunik leads at half-time there is a strong likelihood they will hold or extend the lead. Therefore I select HT/FT 1/1 as the strongest signal (40%), with alternatives X/1 (13%) and X/X (12%); scenarios with the away side leading at half-time or winning are assessed lower (combined 23%), in line with Pyunik’s offensive advantage and home statistics.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Pyunik | Artsakh | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Artsakh is 10% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Pyunik · 2.2 pts / match - Artsakh
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Artsakh is 60% better for: goals scored per match.
1.4 goals / match - Pyunik · 2.24 goals / match - Artsakh
Pyunik is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.68 goals / match - Pyunik · 0.76 goals / match - Artsakh
Pyunik scores in 80% of matches (20 of 25 matches), while Artsakh keeps a clean sheet in 56% (14 of 25 matches).
Artsakh scores in 80% of matches (20 of 25 matches), while Pyunik keeps a clean sheet in 52% (13 of 25 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Pyunik
Over / Under - Artsakh
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Artsakh is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.6 pts / match - Pyunik · 2.08 pts / match - Artsakh
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Pyunik - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 64%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Artsakh - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 60% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 2.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +7 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +13 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Pyunik
Artsakh
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Armenian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Pyunik | Liga | Artsakh | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.08 | 2.58 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 36% | 45% | ▼ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 36% | 47% | ▲ 56% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 52% | 32% | ▲ 56% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 72% | 70% | ▲ 76% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 76% | 79% | • 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Pyunik 0 - 1 - 1 Artsakh. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Pyunik vs Artsakh?
The Armenian Premier League match finished Pyunik 0:0 Artsakh. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Pyunik and Artsakh?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Pyunik won 0, Artsakh won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Pyunik vs Artsakh?
Pyunik score 1.40 goals per game on average and Artsakh 2.24. The Armenian Premier League average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 36% of Pyunik's matches and 40% of Artsakh's.
What form are Pyunik and Artsakh in?
Over the last 5 games Pyunik have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Artsakh 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pyunik vs Artsakh?
The statistical background for Pyunik vs Artsakh — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


