Qingdao Jonoon vs Chengdu Better City FC: match statistics
Qingdao Jonoon vs Chengdu Better City FC: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Qingdao Jonoon played Chengdu Better City FC in Chinese Super League (China). The match was played on 5 July 2026. Venue: Qingdao Tiantai Stadium. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Qingdao Jonoon: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Chengdu Better City FC: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Qingdao Jonoon scores 1.63 and concedes 1.69 goals per match. Chengdu Better City FC scores 2.25 and concedes 0.94. League average: 3.06 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Qingdao Jonoon 69%, Chengdu Better City FC 50%. Over 2.5: Qingdao Jonoon 63%, Chengdu Better City FC 63%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 60%.
xG, shots and style
Chengdu Better City FC has higher xG: 1.72 vs 1.29. Qingdao Jonoon: 11.6 shots per match, Chengdu Better City FC: 14.6.
Match halves
Qingdao Jonoon: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.94. Chengdu Better City FC: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 1.31.
Goals by minute
Qingdao Jonoon: 76-90+ (7 goals). Chengdu Better City FC: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Chinese Super League: 3.06 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 60%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-2. Average goals 0.67, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The favorites are the visitors: Chengdu Better City FC sit 1st with a record of 13 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses and a goal tally of 36-15, while Qingdao Jonoon are 14th with 6 wins, 2 draws and 8 losses and a 26-27 goal record. In their last five matches Chengdu have 3 wins and 2 losses, scored 8 and conceded 5, averaging 1.8 points per game, whereas Qingdao have just 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, scored 9 and conceded 10, averaging 0.8 points per game. Looking at quality of chances, the visitors generate on the road an average of 11.75 shots and 4.0 on target with 53% possession and xG 1.41 (xG against 1.31), while the home side produce 11.25 shots and 4.13 on target with 43% possession and xG 1.30 (xG against 1.54) — this suggests Chengdu have better control and superior expected chances. Defensively Qingdao concede on average 1.25 goals per home game, and Chengdu concede 1.38 away, however in the last 5 fixtures the hosts have conceded 10 goals versus 5 conceded by Chengdu, indicating a weaker defensive trend for the hosts. Considering the advantage in control, the lower no-score rate 13% vs 25% and higher away effectiveness (75% wins), I tip the visitors to win ('2') with probability distribution 15% home / 25% draw / 60% away.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes (68% vs 32%) because league context and team metrics strongly support both teams scoring. The league records 64% of matches with both teams to score, and Chengdu posts a season BTTS rate of 63%, indicating an away tendency for Goal/Goal outcomes. Qingdao at home averages 2.63 goals scored and xG 2.04 with 7.0 shots on target, while conceding 10 goals in the last 5 matches (2.0 per game), which raises the likelihood of an opponent goal. Chengdu have 36 scored and 15 conceded this season, generated xG 1.84 and scored 8 goals in the last 5, so they can respond; given the home xG 2.04 vs away xG against Chengdu 1.31 and seasonal goals averages 2.63 vs 1.88, a both teams to score scenario appears more probable.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model gives 1.68 expected goals for Qingdao and 1.23 for Chengdu, totaling 2.91 expected goals. Qingdao averages 2.04 xG and 17.38 shots per game (7.0 on target), while Chengdu has 1.41 xG and 11.75 shots (4.0 on target), indicating a home advantage in chance creation. Season-wise both teams have Over2.5 in 63% of matches, with the league average at 60%, however the xG distribution and a Poisson model at a total of 2.91 yield a probability of Over2.5 around 55% and Over1.5 around 79%. In the last 5 matches Qingdao recorded Over2.5 in 80% of games, and Chengdu in 40%, which further boosts the likelihood of at least 2 goals in the match. Therefore the strongest signal is a bet on Over 1.5 (79% chance), while Over 2.5 has a moderate edge (55%), and Over 3.5 remains unlikely (~33%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Qingdao dominates the first half: they average 1.25 goals by half-time and concede only 0.25, leading at the break in 63% of matches (5 times). Chengdu’s first-half metrics are weaker — they average 0.63 goals and lead at the break in 25% of games (2 times), which reduces the visitors’ chance of holding a lead after 45 minutes. The difference in chance quality is clear: the home xG is 2.04 versus 1.41 for the away side, and Qingdao average 17.38 shots and 7 on target compared to Chengdu’s 11.75 and 4; the hosts win 88% of matches at home and concede an average of 0.5 goals per game. The second half is active (on average 1.63 home goals and 2.25 away goals after the break, and 88% of home matches feature at least one goal in the second half), so while a draw or a turnaround is possible, the strongest scenario supported by the data is the hosts leading at half-time and winning the match (1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Qingdao Jonoon | Chengdu Better City FC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.41 | 0.41 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Chengdu Better City FC is 200% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Qingdao Jonoon · 1.8 pts / match - Chengdu Better City FC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chengdu Better City FC is 38% better for: goals scored per match.
1.63 goals / match - Qingdao Jonoon · 2.25 goals / match - Chengdu Better City FC
Chengdu Better City FC is 80% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.69 goals / match - Qingdao Jonoon · 0.94 goals / match - Chengdu Better City FC
Qingdao Jonoon scores in 75% of matches (12 of 16 matches), while Chengdu Better City FC keeps a clean sheet in 38% (6 of 16 matches).
Chengdu Better City FC scores in 88% of matches (14 of 16 matches), while Qingdao Jonoon keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 16 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Qingdao Jonoon
Over / Under - Chengdu Better City FC
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chengdu Better City FC is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / match - Qingdao Jonoon · 1.75 pts / match - Chengdu Better City FC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Qingdao Jonoon - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Chengdu Better City FC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 81%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Qingdao Jonoon
Chengdu Better City FC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).
Teams vs league
| Qingdao Jonoon | Liga | Chengdu Better City FC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.31 | 3.06 | ▲ 3.19 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 69% | 63% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 63% | 60% | ▲ 63% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 20% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 63% | 69% | ▼ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | • 88% | 88% | ▲ 94% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Qingdao Jonoon 0 - 1 - 2 Chengdu Better City FC. Average goals 0.67, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Qingdao Jonoon vs Chengdu Better City FC?
The Chinese Super League match finished Qingdao Jonoon 1:1 Chengdu Better City FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Qingdao Jonoon and Chengdu Better City FC?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Qingdao Jonoon won 0, Chengdu Better City FC won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 0.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Qingdao Jonoon vs Chengdu Better City FC?
Qingdao Jonoon score 1.63 goals per game on average and Chengdu Better City FC 2.25. The Chinese Super League average is 3.06 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 69% of Qingdao Jonoon's matches and 50% of Chengdu Better City FC's.
What form are Qingdao Jonoon and Chengdu Better City FC in?
Over the last 5 games Qingdao Jonoon have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Chengdu Better City FC 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Qingdao Jonoon vs Chengdu Better City FC?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Qingdao Jonoon vs Chengdu Better City FC: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


