China - Chinese Super LeagueQingdao Tiantai StadiumData current as of 23 July 2026

Qingdao Jonoon vs Chongqing Tongliang Long: match statistics

Qingdao Jonoon vs Chongqing Tongliang Long: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Qingdao Jonoon play Chongqing Tongliang Long in Chinese Super League (China). The match date is 24 May 2026 at 11:00. Venue: Qingdao Tiantai Stadium. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Qingdao Jonoon: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Chongqing Tongliang Long: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Qingdao Jonoon scores 1.58 and concedes 1.89 goals per match. Chongqing Tongliang Long scores 1.21 and concedes 1.11. League average: 3.09 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Qingdao Jonoon 74%, Chongqing Tongliang Long 58%. Over 2.5: Qingdao Jonoon 63%, Chongqing Tongliang Long 37%. League level: BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 59%.

xG, shots and style

Qingdao Jonoon has higher xG: 1.33 vs 0.98. Qingdao Jonoon: 12.2 shots per match, Chongqing Tongliang Long: 8.7.

Match halves

Qingdao Jonoon: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 1.00. Chongqing Tongliang Long: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.79.

Goals by minute

Qingdao Jonoon: 76-90+ (8 goals). Chongqing Tongliang Long: 46-60 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Chinese Super League: 3.09 goals per match, BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 59%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

I back the home win because Qingdao holds a clear edge in chance quality and finishing — at home they average 2.0 goals per game and 11.5 shots (4.33 on target), whereas the visitors average 1.0 goal and 6.33 shots (2.67 on target) away. In the last 5 matches the hosts scored 12 goals (2.4 per game) and averaged 1.8 points per game, while Chongqing managed only 4 goals (0.8 per game) and 0.6 points per game. Home xG for Qingdao is 1.28 versus 0.73 for the visitors on the road, indicating Qingdao creates more high-value scoring opportunities. Despite similar goals conceded averages (1.17 per game each), the hosts have a +5 home goal differential and a lower share of games without scoring (17% vs 33% for the visitors), reflecting superior finishing. Considering Qingdao’s 67% home win rate and Chongqing’s absence of wins in the last 5 matches, I forecast a victory for the home side.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
13Shots5
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
1Shots on target4
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
1.38xG0.81
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
8Corners3
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
68Dangerous attacks28
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
20Fouls13
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
2Cards2
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
1.58Goals scored / match1.21
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
1.89Goals conceded / match1.11
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
45%Average possession48%
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
4.05Shots on target / match3.32
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.16Shots per match8.68
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
4.05Shots on target3.32
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
13%Shot conversion13.9%
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
45%Possession48%
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
1.33xG for0.98
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
1.69xG against1.3
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long

Shooting quality

Qingdao Jonoon: Counter-attackingChongqing Tongliang Long: Efficient finishing
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
Accuracy (shots on target)33%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chongqing Tongliang Long is 25% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Qingdao Jonoon · 1 pts / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long

Qingdao Jonoon
LWDLL
Season result split
32% W16% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-10
1.11 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-2-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.99BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
Chongqing Tongliang Long
LWLDD
Season result split
37% W42% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-8-4
1.53 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-3
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.02Opponent xG: 1.68BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Qingdao Jonoon is 31% better for: goals scored per match.

1.58 goals / match - Qingdao Jonoon · 1.21 goals / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long

Chongqing Tongliang Long is 70% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.89 goals / match - Qingdao Jonoon · 1.11 goals / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long

Qingdao Jonoon scoring profile: strong

Qingdao Jonoon scores in 79% of matches (15 of 19 matches), while Chongqing Tongliang Long keeps a clean sheet in 37% (7 of 19 matches).

Chongqing Tongliang Long scoring profile: very strong

Chongqing Tongliang Long scores in 84% of matches (16 of 19 matches), while Qingdao Jonoon keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 19 matches).

30Goals scored (season)23
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
36Goals conceded (season)21
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
3.47Average goals in match2.32
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
10Goals scored (last 5)6
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
14Goals conceded (last 5)8
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal84%
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
42%2 goals32%
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
26%3 goals5%
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
11%4 goals0%
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long

How often they concede at least...

89%1 goal63%
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
47%2 goals26%
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
32%3 goals21%
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
16%4 goals0%
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

58%
Chongqing Tongliang Long - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 19 matches
65%
League average

Goal patterns

5%BTTS at half-time5%
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
21%Scored in both halves0%
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long

BTTS and goal count

63%Min. 3 goals and BTTS37%
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
100%BTTS - last 580%
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time53%
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time32%
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long

2nd half

89%Min. 1 goal after half-time84%
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
68%Min. 2 goals after half-time37%
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
42%Min. 3 goals after half-time16%
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Qingdao Jonoon is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.32 pts / match - Qingdao Jonoon · 1.16 pts / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long

Qingdao Jonoon - half-time state
32% leading37% draw32% trailing
Chongqing Tongliang Long - half-time state
21% leading53% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.32Points per match (1st half)1.16
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
0.58Goals scored (1st half)0.42
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
0.68Goals conceded (1st half)0.42
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
1.26Average goals (1st half)0.84
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
63%Clean sheet before half-time68%
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
68%No goal before half-time74%
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long

After half-time (2nd half)

1.37Points per match (2nd half)1.58
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
1.21Goals conceded (2nd half)0.68
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
2.21Average goals (2nd half)1.47
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
21%Clean sheet after half-time53%
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long
32%No goal after half-time42%
Qingdao JonoonChongqing Tongliang Long

Qingdao Jonoon - second-half results

32% W42% R26% P
25
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chongqing Tongliang Long - second-half results

42% W32% R26% P
22
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.16
PPG before half-time
Lead holding176%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Qingdao Jonoon - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match1.21.6
Average goals in match2.02.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Chongqing Tongliang Long - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.00
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match0.82.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Qingdao Jonoon
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
2
7
16-30
4
3
31-45
4
11
46-60
7
5
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Chongqing Tongliang Long
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
3
3
16-30
2
5
31-45
6
4
46-60
5
4
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.90
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
66%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Qingdao Jonoon

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
145%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Chongqing Tongliang Long

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.42
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
62%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.53
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).

Teams vs league

Qingdao JonoonLigaChongqing Tongliang Long
Average goals in match 3.473.09 2.32
Both teams scored 74%65% 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 63%59% 37%
Clean sheets 11%19% 37%
Goal before half-time 63%70% 53%
Goal after half-time 89%89% 84%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.09
Average goals per match
65%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
1.80
Home goals / match
1.30
Away goals / match
+38%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
89%
1 goal
56%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Qingdao Jonoon vs Chongqing Tongliang Long?

The Chinese Super League match finished Qingdao Jonoon 0:1 Chongqing Tongliang Long. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Qingdao Jonoon vs Chongqing Tongliang Long?

Qingdao Jonoon score 1.58 goals per game on average and Chongqing Tongliang Long 1.21. The Chinese Super League average is 3.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 74% of Qingdao Jonoon's matches and 58% of Chongqing Tongliang Long's.

What form are Qingdao Jonoon and Chongqing Tongliang Long in?

Over the last 5 games Qingdao Jonoon have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Chongqing Tongliang Long 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Qingdao Jonoon vs Chongqing Tongliang Long?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Qingdao Jonoon vs Chongqing Tongliang Long: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.