Uzbekistan - Uzbekistan Super LeagueData current as of 12 September 2026

Qizilqum vs AGMK: match statistics

Qizilqum crest
Qizilqum
0 : 1half-time 0:1
AGMK crest
AGMK
165%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
210%(0.00)

Qizilqum is displaying impressive home form with a 100% win rate in their home matches, scoring an average of 2 goals per game while conceding just 1. AGMK, on the other hand, has not won any away match this season (0% Win%), failing to score on the road (0 goals on average). The difference in offensive efficiency is drastic – the hosts have a 25% shot conversion rate in home games, while the visitors have not registered any points away. The recent form over the last five matches also favors the home side (1.4 PPG vs 1.0 PPG), and Qizilqum's last home outing ended in victory. xG statistics show a slight advantage for the hosts (1.01 vs 1.03), but the real scoring efficiency and goal difference clearly indicate a decisive advantage for Qizilqum in this encounter.

Qizilqum vs AGMK: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Qizilqum played AGMK in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The match was played on 18 March 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Qizilqum: 2-0-1, 2.00 points/match. AGMK: 0-1-2, 0.33 points/match.

Goal statistics

Qizilqum scores 1.33 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. AGMK scores 0.67 and concedes 1.33. League average: 2.23 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Qizilqum 33%, AGMK 33%. Over 2.5: Qizilqum 33%, AGMK 33%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

AGMK has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.08. Qizilqum: 8.7 shots per match, AGMK: 13.0.

Match halves

Qizilqum: half-time lead 67%, second-half goals 0.67. AGMK: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

Qizilqum: 31-45+ (2 goals). AGMK: 46-60 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uzbekistan Super League: 2.23 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Qizilqum is displaying impressive home form with a 100% win rate in their home matches, scoring an average of 2 goals per game while conceding just 1. AGMK, on the other hand, has not won any away match this season (0% Win%), failing to score on the road (0 goals on average). The difference in offensive efficiency is drastic – the hosts have a 25% shot conversion rate in home games, while the visitors have not registered any points away. The recent form over the last five matches also favors the home side (1.4 PPG vs 1.0 PPG), and Qizilqum's last home outing ended in victory. xG statistics show a slight advantage for the hosts (1.01 vs 1.03), but the real scoring efficiency and goal difference clearly indicate a decisive advantage for Qizilqum in this encounter.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
QizilqumAGMK
15Shots7
QizilqumAGMK
1Shots on target2
QizilqumAGMK
1.3xG0.86
QizilqumAGMK
4Corners4
QizilqumAGMK
39Dangerous attacks38
QizilqumAGMK
17Fouls15
QizilqumAGMK
4Cards0
QizilqumAGMK

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.33Goals scored / match0.67
QizilqumAGMK
1Goals conceded / match1.33
QizilqumAGMK
37%Average possession53%
QizilqumAGMK
2.67Shots on target / match3.67
QizilqumAGMK

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.67Shots per match13
QizilqumAGMK
2.67Shots on target3.67
QizilqumAGMK
15.4%Shot conversion5.1%
QizilqumAGMK
37%Possession53%
QizilqumAGMK
1.08xG for1.47
QizilqumAGMK
1.52xG against1.03
QizilqumAGMK

Shooting quality

Qizilqum: Counter-attackingAGMK: Balanced
QizilqumAGMK
Accuracy (shots on target)31%28%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.500.18

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Qizilqum is 506% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Qizilqum · 0.33 pts / match - AGMK

Qizilqum
LWW
Season result split
67% W0% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.3Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.08Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 33%Over 2.5: 33%
AGMK
LLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W33% D67% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-2
0.33 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-2
0.33 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 away
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.7Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.03BTTS: 33%Over 2.5: 33%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Qizilqum is 99% better for: goals scored per match.

1.33 goals / match - Qizilqum · 0.67 goals / match - AGMK

Qizilqum is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Qizilqum · 1.33 goals / match - AGMK

Qizilqum scoring profile: very strong

Qizilqum scores in 67% of matches (2 of 3 matches), while AGMK keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 matches).

AGMK scoring profile: mixed

AGMK scores in 33% of matches (1 of 3 matches), while Qizilqum keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 matches).

4Goals scored (season)2
QizilqumAGMK
3Goals conceded (season)4
QizilqumAGMK
2.33Average goals in match2
QizilqumAGMK
4Goals scored (last 5)2
QizilqumAGMK
3Goals conceded (last 5)4
QizilqumAGMK

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal33%
QizilqumAGMK
67%2 goals33%
QizilqumAGMK
0%3 goals0%
QizilqumAGMK
0%4 goals0%
QizilqumAGMK

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal100%
QizilqumAGMK
33%2 goals33%
QizilqumAGMK
0%3 goals0%
QizilqumAGMK
0%4 goals0%
QizilqumAGMK

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
QizilqumAGMK
0%BTTS in both halves0%
QizilqumAGMK
67%Scored in both halves0%
QizilqumAGMK

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
QizilqumAGMK
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
QizilqumAGMK
33%BTTS - last 533%
QizilqumAGMK

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time33%
QizilqumAGMK
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
QizilqumAGMK
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
QizilqumAGMK

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
QizilqumAGMK
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
QizilqumAGMK
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
QizilqumAGMK

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Qizilqum is 248% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.33 pts / match - Qizilqum · 0.67 pts / match - AGMK

Qizilqum - half-time state
67% leading33% draw0% trailing
AGMK - half-time state
0% leading67% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.33Points per match (1st half)0.67
QizilqumAGMK
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0
QizilqumAGMK
0Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
QizilqumAGMK
0.67Average goals (1st half)0.33
QizilqumAGMK
100%Clean sheet before half-time67%
QizilqumAGMK
33%No goal before half-time100%
QizilqumAGMK

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)1
QizilqumAGMK
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
QizilqumAGMK
1Goals conceded (2nd half)1
QizilqumAGMK
1.67Average goals (2nd half)1.67
QizilqumAGMK
33%Clean sheet after half-time0%
QizilqumAGMK
33%No goal after half-time67%
QizilqumAGMK

Qizilqum - second-half results

33% W33% D33% L
7
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 67% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

AGMK - second-half results

33% W0% D67% L
2
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.67
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Qizilqum - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.331.33
Goals scored / match0.70.7
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match0.71.7
1 goal67%100%
2 goals0%67%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%33%
No goal33%33%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 67% leading - 33% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 33% won - 33% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
AGMK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.671.00
Goals scored / match0.00.7
Goals conceded / match0.31.0
Average goals in match0.31.7
1 goal33%100%
2 goals0%33%
3 goals0%33%
Clean sheet67%0%
No goal100%67%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 67% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 33% won - 0% draw - 67% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Qizilqum
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
2
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

AGMK
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
1
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.17
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
33%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-8%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
22%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
22%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Qizilqum

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.44
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.77
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.52
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
116%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

AGMK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.44
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.80
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
62%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).

Teams vs league

QizilqumLigaAGMK
Average goals in match 2.332.23 2.00
Both teams scored 33%38% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%46% 33%
Clean sheets 33%35% 0%
Goal before half-time 67%65% 33%
Goal after half-time 100%77% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.23
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.15
Home goals / match
1.08
Away goals / match
+6%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+-4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. QizilqumSubstitutionOn: Shahzod TuropovOff: Asror Gafurov
  2. QizilqumYellow cardOleksіy Shchebetun
  3. QizilqumYellow cardShahzod Turopov
  4. AGMKSubstitutionOn: Naoaki SenagaOff: Siavash Haghnazari
  5. QizilqumYellow cardFayzullobek Jumankuziev
  6. QizilqumYellow cardIslom Kenjabaev

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Qizilqum 0 - 1 - 1 AGMK. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FK AGMK
0 : 0
Qizilqum Zarafshon PFK
Qizilqum Zarafshon PFK
1 : 3
FK AGMK

FAQ

What was the result of Qizilqum vs AGMK?

The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Qizilqum 0:1 AGMK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Qizilqum and AGMK?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Qizilqum won 0, AGMK won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Qizilqum vs AGMK?

Qizilqum score 1.33 goals per game on average and AGMK 0.67. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Qizilqum's matches and 33% of AGMK's.

What form are Qizilqum and AGMK in?

Over the last 5 games Qizilqum have a 2-0-1 record (2.00 points per game) and AGMK 0-1-2 (0.33 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Qizilqum vs AGMK?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.