Uzbekistan - Uzbekistan Super LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Qizilqum vs Sogdiana: match statistics

Qizilqum crest
Qizilqum
1 : 3half-time 0:2
Sogdiana crest
Sogdiana

Qizilqum vs Sogdiana: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Qizilqum play Sogdiana in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The match date is 13 April 2026 at 17:15. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

Qizilqum: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Sogdiana: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Qizilqum scores 0.77 and concedes 1.38 goals per match. Sogdiana scores 1.69 and concedes 2.31. League average: 2.63 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Qizilqum 38%, Sogdiana 77%. Over 2.5: Qizilqum 38%, Sogdiana 77%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Sogdiana has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.19. Qizilqum: 9.8 shots per match, Sogdiana: 11.5.

Match halves

Qizilqum: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.38. Sogdiana: half-time lead 46%, second-half goals 0.77.

Goals by minute

Qizilqum: 31-45+ (3 goals). Sogdiana: 16-30 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uzbekistan Super League: 2.63 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 0-1-1. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Qizilqum have the edge due to better recent form and results: over the last five matches they averaged 1.2 points per game and have 2 wins this season, while Sogdiana average only 0.4 points per game in their last 5 and have yet to win away (0 wins). The home defence looks slightly more solid — Qizilqum concede 2.00 goals per game at home, whereas Sogdiana concede 2.67 goals away; the goal difference in home matches is -4 versus -5 for the visitors. Sogdiana’s attack is more efficient in terms of shot quality: the visitors average 3.0 shots on target per game and have an 11% conversion rate, while the hosts have 1.67 shots on target and a 6% conversion, and the xG for both teams is nearly identical (1.09 vs 1.08). However, the hosts have a high percentage of home matches without scoring — 67% — which can limit their effectiveness; meanwhile Sogdiana have no clean sheets (0%) and conceded 12 goals in the last five matches. Considering the hosts’ better points figures (1.2 vs 0.4), lower average goals conceded at home and the visitors’ lack of away wins, I project a Qizilqum victory, albeit by a modest margin and with a low total goal count.

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
QizilqumSogdiana
13Shots12
QizilqumSogdiana
3Shots on target6
QizilqumSogdiana
1.45xG1.61
QizilqumSogdiana
6Corners1
QizilqumSogdiana
59Dangerous attacks60
QizilqumSogdiana
8Fouls11
QizilqumSogdiana
1Cards4
QizilqumSogdiana

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.77Goals scored / match1.69
QizilqumSogdiana
1.38Goals conceded / match2.31
QizilqumSogdiana
41%Average possession41%
QizilqumSogdiana
2.77Shots on target / match4.54
QizilqumSogdiana

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.85Shots per match11.46
QizilqumSogdiana
2.77Shots on target4.54
QizilqumSogdiana
7.8%Shot conversion14.8%
QizilqumSogdiana
41%Possession41%
QizilqumSogdiana
1.19xG for1.4
QizilqumSogdiana
1.37xG against1.45
QizilqumSogdiana

Shooting quality

Qizilqum: BalancedSogdiana: Counter-attacking
QizilqumSogdiana
Accuracy (shots on target)28%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Sogdiana is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Qizilqum · 1.4 pts / match - Sogdiana

Qizilqum
WDLLD
Season result split
31% W15% R54% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-7
1.08 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-4
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LLWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.18Opponent xG: 1.30BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Sogdiana
DWLWL
Season result split
23% W23% R54% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-7
0.92 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-3
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.38Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Sogdiana is 119% better for: goals scored per match.

0.77 goals / match - Qizilqum · 1.69 goals / match - Sogdiana

Qizilqum is 67% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.38 goals / match - Qizilqum · 2.31 goals / match - Sogdiana

Qizilqum scoring profile: very strong

Qizilqum scores in 54% of matches (7 of 13 matches), while Sogdiana keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 13 matches).

Sogdiana scoring profile: very strong

Sogdiana scores in 85% of matches (11 of 13 matches), while Qizilqum keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).

10Goals scored (season)22
QizilqumSogdiana
18Goals conceded (season)30
QizilqumSogdiana
2.15Average goals in match4
QizilqumSogdiana
4Goals scored (last 5)10
QizilqumSogdiana
5Goals conceded (last 5)10
QizilqumSogdiana

How often they score at least...

54%1 goal85%
QizilqumSogdiana
23%2 goals54%
QizilqumSogdiana
0%3 goals15%
QizilqumSogdiana
0%4 goals8%
QizilqumSogdiana

How often they concede at least...

77%1 goal92%
QizilqumSogdiana
38%2 goals77%
QizilqumSogdiana
15%3 goals31%
QizilqumSogdiana
8%4 goals23%
QizilqumSogdiana

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

57%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time23%
QizilqumSogdiana
0%BTTS in both halves8%
QizilqumSogdiana
15%Scored in both halves38%
QizilqumSogdiana

BTTS and goal count

31%Min. 3 goals and BTTS69%
QizilqumSogdiana
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
QizilqumSogdiana
60%BTTS - last 580%
QizilqumSogdiana

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time85%
QizilqumSogdiana
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time62%
QizilqumSogdiana
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
QizilqumSogdiana

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time92%
QizilqumSogdiana
31%Min. 2 goals after half-time85%
QizilqumSogdiana
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time31%
QizilqumSogdiana

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Sogdiana is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.08 pts / match - Qizilqum · 1.62 pts / match - Sogdiana

Qizilqum - half-time state
23% leading38% draw38% trailing
Sogdiana - half-time state
46% leading23% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.08Points per match (1st half)1.62
QizilqumSogdiana
0.38Goals scored (1st half)0.92
QizilqumSogdiana
0.77Goals conceded (1st half)0.77
QizilqumSogdiana
1.15Average goals (1st half)1.69
QizilqumSogdiana
46%Clean sheet before half-time54%
QizilqumSogdiana
69%No goal before half-time38%
QizilqumSogdiana

After half-time (2nd half)

1.15Points per match (2nd half)0.77
QizilqumSogdiana
0.38Goals scored (2nd half)0.77
QizilqumSogdiana
0.62Goals conceded (2nd half)1.54
QizilqumSogdiana
1Average goals (2nd half)2.31
QizilqumSogdiana
54%Clean sheet after half-time15%
QizilqumSogdiana
62%No goal after half-time38%
QizilqumSogdiana

Qizilqum - second-half results

23% W46% R31% P
14
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.08
PPG before half-time
Lead holding135%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Sogdiana - second-half results

15% W31% R54% P
21
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.62
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at half-time in 46% of matches and wins 23%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.8

Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Qizilqum - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.2
Average goals in match1.40.4
1 goal60%40%
2 goals60%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Sogdiana - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.60
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.62.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Qizilqum
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
2
5
16-30
3
3
31-45
1
3
46-60
1
3
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Sogdiana
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
5
2
16-30
3
5
31-45
2
8
46-60
5
5
61-75
3
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.08
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
117%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-51%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
46%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Qizilqum

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.43
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
57%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Sogdiana

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.57
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.86
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
131%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
171%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.48
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).

Teams vs league

QizilqumLigaSogdiana
Average goals in match 2.152.63 4.00
Both teams scored 38%57% 77%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 38%53% 77%
Clean sheets 23%25% 8%
Goal before half-time 69%69% 85%
Goal after half-time 69%78% 92%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.63
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.35
Home goals / match
1.29
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Qizilqum 0 - 1 - 1 Sogdiana. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FK Sogdiana Jizak
3 : 0
Qizilqum Zarafshon PFK
Qizilqum Zarafshon PFK
0 : 0
FK Sogdiana Jizak

FAQ

What was the result of Qizilqum vs Sogdiana?

The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Qizilqum 1:3 Sogdiana. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Qizilqum and Sogdiana?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Qizilqum won 0, Sogdiana won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Qizilqum vs Sogdiana?

Qizilqum score 0.77 goals per game on average and Sogdiana 1.69. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Qizilqum's matches and 77% of Sogdiana's.

What form are Qizilqum and Sogdiana in?

Over the last 5 games Qizilqum have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Sogdiana 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Qizilqum vs Sogdiana?

The statistical background for Qizilqum vs Sogdiana — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.