Scotland - ChampionshipData current as of 07 September 2026

Queen's Park vs Greenock Morton: match statistics

Queen's Park crest
Queen's Park
3 : 2half-time 1:1
Greenock Morton crest
Greenock Morton
130%(2.75)
X40%(3.10)
230%(2.47)

Statistical analysis indicates evenly matched chances for both teams, favoring a draw. Queen's Park displays poor home form with only 18% wins and a high draw rate (45%) at their home ground, confirmed by a streak of 11 consecutive home matches without a victory. Greenock Morton exhibits an even greater tendency for draws away (50%), which is the highest rate in their statistics. Both teams have a negative goal difference in their matches (Queen's Park -3, Morton -4) as well as similar issues in offensive efficiency – the hosts average only 0.82 goals per home match, while the visitors score 1.08 goals per away game. The recent form of both sides is comparable (Queen's Park: 1.4 PPG, Morton: 1.6 PPG in the last 5 matches), and the xG difference is minimal, further supporting the prediction of a drawn outcome.

Queen's Park vs Greenock Morton: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Queen's Park played Greenock Morton in Championship (Scotland). The match was played on 21 February 2026. Final score: 3:2.

Current form

Queen's Park: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Greenock Morton: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Queen's Park scores 1.04 and concedes 1.52 goals per match. Greenock Morton scores 1.00 and concedes 1.16. League average: 2.42 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Queen's Park 61%, Greenock Morton 52%. Over 2.5: Queen's Park 52%, Greenock Morton 32%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

Greenock Morton has higher xG: 1.13 vs 1.00. Queen's Park: 7.8 shots per match, Greenock Morton: 8.9.

Match halves

Queen's Park: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.52. Greenock Morton: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.56.

Goals by minute

Queen's Park: 31-45+ (8 goals). Greenock Morton: 16-30 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Championship: 2.42 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis indicates evenly matched chances for both teams, favoring a draw. Queen's Park displays poor home form with only 18% wins and a high draw rate (45%) at their home ground, confirmed by a streak of 11 consecutive home matches without a victory. Greenock Morton exhibits an even greater tendency for draws away (50%), which is the highest rate in their statistics. Both teams have a negative goal difference in their matches (Queen's Park -3, Morton -4) as well as similar issues in offensive efficiency – the hosts average only 0.82 goals per home match, while the visitors score 1.08 goals per away game. The recent form of both sides is comparable (Queen's Park: 1.4 PPG, Morton: 1.6 PPG in the last 5 matches), and the xG difference is minimal, further supporting the prediction of a drawn outcome.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
12Shots8
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
6Shots on target5
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
1.54xG1.17
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
3Corners4
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
50Dangerous attacks43
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
9Fouls17
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
1Cards2
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
1.04Goals scored / match1
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
1.52Goals conceded / match1.16
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
44%Average possession49%
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
2.96Shots on target / match2.88
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.78Shots per match8.88
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
2.96Shots on target2.88
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
13.4%Shot conversion11.3%
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
44%Possession49%
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
1xG for1.13
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
1.63xG against1.44
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton

Shooting quality

Queen's Park: Counter-attackingGreenock Morton: Balanced
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
Accuracy (shots on target)38%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Greenock Morton is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Queen's Park · 1.6 pts / match - Greenock Morton

Queen's Park
DLWLW
Season result split
22% W39% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-9-9
1.04 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-5-4
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WDDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.09Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Greenock Morton
LDWDW
Season result split
24% W48% R28% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-12-7
1.20 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-6-4
Last 5 away
1-1-3
WLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.07Opponent xG: 1.35BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Greenock Morton is 31% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.52 goals / match - Queen's Park · 1.16 goals / match - Greenock Morton

Queen's Park scoring profile: strong

Queen's Park scores in 70% of matches (16 of 23 matches), while Greenock Morton keeps a clean sheet in 28% (7 of 25 matches).

Greenock Morton scoring profile: strong

Greenock Morton scores in 68% of matches (17 of 25 matches), while Queen's Park keeps a clean sheet in 26% (6 of 23 matches).

24Goals scored (season)25
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
35Goals conceded (season)29
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
2.57Average goals in match2.16
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
6Goals scored (last 5)7
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
8Goals conceded (last 5)4
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal68%
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
26%2 goals28%
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
9%3 goals4%
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
0%4 goals0%
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton

How often they concede at least...

74%1 goal72%
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
35%2 goals20%
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
22%3 goals12%
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
17%4 goals8%
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

26%BTTS at half-time4%
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
17%Scored in both halves20%
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS20%
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS12%
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
60%BTTS - last 540%
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
43%Min. 2 goals before half-time16%
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
30%Min. 2 goals after half-time32%
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time12%
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Greenock Morton is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.26 pts / match - Queen's Park · 1.44 pts / match - Greenock Morton

Queen's Park - half-time state
26% leading48% draw26% trailing
Greenock Morton - half-time state
36% leading36% draw28% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.26Points per match (1st half)1.44
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
0.52Goals scored (1st half)0.44
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
0.78Goals conceded (1st half)0.52
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
1.3Average goals (1st half)0.96
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
52%Clean sheet before half-time68%
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
52%No goal before half-time60%
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton

After half-time (2nd half)

1.04Points per match (2nd half)1.32
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
0.52Goals scored (2nd half)0.56
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
0.74Goals conceded (2nd half)0.64
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
1.26Average goals (2nd half)1.2
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
48%Clean sheet after half-time52%
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton
61%No goal after half-time52%
Queen's ParkGreenock Morton

Queen's Park - second-half results

22% W39% R39% P
29
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.26
PPG before half-time
Lead holding85%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 22%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Greenock Morton - second-half results

32% W36% R32% P
36
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.44
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 24%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Queen's Park - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.81.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Greenock Morton - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.60
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.00.8
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+4-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Queen's Park
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
2
7
16-30
8
7
31-45
1
3
46-60
3
4
61-75
8
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Greenock Morton
ScoredConceded
0
3
0-15
7
5
16-30
4
5
31-45
3
8
46-60
4
2
61-75
7
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.36
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-37%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Queen's Park

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.63
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
135%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.36
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Greenock Morton

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Championship).

Teams vs league

Queen's ParkLigaGreenock Morton
Average goals in match 2.572.42 2.16
Both teams scored 61%49% 52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 52%44% 32%
Clean sheets 26%32% 28%
Goal before half-time 70%69% 68%
Goal after half-time 70%71% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.42
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.29
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Queen's ParkGoalMatthew Shiels
  2. Queen's ParkGoalNikolay TodorovAssist: Roddy MacGregor
  3. Greenock MortonYellow cardGrant Gillespie
  4. Greenock MortonYellow cardReuben Lopata-White
  5. Queen's ParkGoalHenry FieldsonAssist: Carlo Pignatiello
  6. Queen's ParkSubstitutionOn: Michael RuthOff: Sebastian Drozd
  7. Greenock MortonGoalIain WilsonAssist: Michael O'Halloran
  8. Queen's ParkSubstitutionOn: Liam McLeishOff: Nikolay Todorov
  9. Queen's ParkGoalAidan ConnollyAssist: Callum Smith
  10. Greenock MortonSubstitutionOn: Fergus OwensOff: Grant Gillespie
  11. Queen's ParkSubstitutionOn: Magnus MackenzieOff: Callum Smith

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Queen's Park 0 - 1 - 1 Greenock Morton. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Greenock Morton FC
2 : 1
Queen's Park FC
Queen's Park FC
0 : 0
Greenock Morton FC

FAQ

What was the result of Queen's Park vs Greenock Morton?

The Championship match finished Queen's Park 3:2 Greenock Morton. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Queen's Park and Greenock Morton?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Queen's Park won 0, Greenock Morton won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Queen's Park vs Greenock Morton?

Queen's Park score 1.04 goals per game on average and Greenock Morton 1.00. The Championship average is 2.42 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Queen's Park's matches and 52% of Greenock Morton's.

What form are Queen's Park and Greenock Morton in?

Over the last 5 games Queen's Park have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Greenock Morton 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Queen's Park vs Greenock Morton?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Queen's Park vs Greenock Morton: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.