Queen's Park vs Inverness CT: match statistics
Queen's Park vs Inverness CT: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Queen's Park played Inverness CT in Championship (Scotland). The match was played on 13 October 2026. Venue: Ochilview Park. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Queen's Park: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Inverness CT: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Queen's Park scores 0.44 and concedes 1.67 goals per match. Inverness CT scores 1.22 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.06 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Queen's Park 33%, Inverness CT 44%. Over 2.5: Queen's Park 33%, Inverness CT 33%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 30%.
xG, shots and style
Inverness CT has higher xG: 1.26 vs 0.81. Queen's Park: 4.8 shots per match, Inverness CT: 8.7.
Match halves
Queen's Park: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.33. Inverness CT: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
Queen's Park: 16-30 (1 goals). Inverness CT: 16-30 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Championship: 2.06 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 30%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Inverness CT are more likely to win: they have picked up 7 points in their last 5 matches, compared with just 4 for Queen's Park. The visitors average 1.5 goals per away match, while the hosts manage just 0.75 at home and have failed to score in half of those games. The quality of chances also favours Inverness, whose away xG stands at 1.18, compared with Queen's Park's 1.00 at home. The hosts have lost 3 of their 4 home matches and concede an average of 1.75 goals in them, although Inverness's 2 draws in 4 away games mean a share of the points remains a realistic outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
It is more likely that at least one team will fail to score, primarily because of Queen's Park's poor finishing. The hosts average 0.75 goals per match and have failed to score in 50% of their games, while Inverness CT average 1.5 goals and have drawn a blank in 25% of matches. The attacking gap has also been clear over their last five outings: Queen's Park averaged 0.6 goals, compared with 1.6 for the visitors. The case for BTTS - Yes is supported by the fact that Inverness CT concede an average of 1.5 goals, but BTTS has landed in only 25% of the hosts' matches, compared with 36% across the league. Therefore, despite the visitors' attacking threat, Queen's Park failing to score remains the main risk to BTTS.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
In the teams’ matches to date, at least 2 goals have been scored in 75% of cases, providing the strongest signal for Over 1.5 goals. Inverness average 1.5 goals per match, while Queen's Park score 0.75, but have conceded an average of 1.4 goals across their last 5 games. On the other hand, all of Queen's Park’s matches to date have finished Under 2.5 goals, and the league average is 2.02 goals, making higher goal lines less convincing. The 2.3-goal forecast accounts for both the visitors’ attacking potential and the more cautious pattern in the hosts’ matches; Over 1.5 goals is the preferred play.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
In their last five matches, Queen's Park have yet to lead at the break and were trailing at half-time in three of those five games, while Inverness led in two. During this run, the hosts averaged just 0.2 goals before half-time and conceded 1.2, pointing to a greater chance of the visitors taking an early lead. Inverness have recently scored 1.6 goals per match compared with Queen's Park's 0.6, and averaged 1.0 goals after the break against the hosts' 0.4, giving them a case for maintaining their advantage until the final whistle. The forecast is tempered by the hosts' higher xG, at 1.29 compared with the visitors' 1.18, but given both teams' current scoring form, Inverness to lead at half-time and win remains the most likely HT/FT outcome.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Queen's Park | Inverness CT | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 46% | 53% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.20 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Inverness CT is 233% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Queen's Park · 2 pts / match - Inverness CT
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Inverness CT is 177% better for: goals scored per match.
0.44 goals / match - Queen's Park · 1.22 goals / match - Inverness CT
Inverness CT is 67% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.67 goals / match - Queen's Park · 1 goals / match - Inverness CT
Queen's Park scores in 33% of matches (3 of 9 matches), while Inverness CT keeps a clean sheet in 44% (4 of 9 matches).
Inverness CT scores in 67% of matches (6 of 9 matches), while Queen's Park keeps a clean sheet in 11% (1 of 9 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Queen's Park
Over / Under - Inverness CT
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Inverness CT is 177% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.44 pts / match - Queen's Park · 1.22 pts / match - Inverness CT
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Queen's Park - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Inverness CT - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -6 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Queen's Park
Inverness CT
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Championship).
Teams vs league
| Queen's Park | Liga | Inverness CT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.11 | 2.06 | ▲ 2.22 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 38% | ▲ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 33% | 30% | ▲ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 11% | 35% | ▲ 44% |
| Goal before half-time | • 67% | 68% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 78% | 68% | • 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Queen's Park vs Inverness CT?
The Championship match finished Queen's Park 2:1 Inverness CT. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Queen's Park vs Inverness CT?
Queen's Park score 0.44 goals per game on average and Inverness CT 1.22. The Championship average is 2.06 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Queen's Park's matches and 44% of Inverness CT's.
What form are Queen's Park and Inverness CT in?
Over the last 5 games Queen's Park have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Inverness CT 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Queen's Park vs Inverness CT?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


