Scotland - ChampionshipOchilview ParkData current as of 17 October 2026

Queen's Park vs Inverness CT: match statistics

Queen's Park crest
Queen's Park
2 : 1half-time 2:1
Inverness CT crest
Inverness CT

Queen's Park vs Inverness CT: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Queen's Park played Inverness CT in Championship (Scotland). The match was played on 13 October 2026. Venue: Ochilview Park. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Queen's Park: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Inverness CT: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Queen's Park scores 0.44 and concedes 1.67 goals per match. Inverness CT scores 1.22 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.06 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Queen's Park 33%, Inverness CT 44%. Over 2.5: Queen's Park 33%, Inverness CT 33%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 30%.

xG, shots and style

Inverness CT has higher xG: 1.26 vs 0.81. Queen's Park: 4.8 shots per match, Inverness CT: 8.7.

Match halves

Queen's Park: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.33. Inverness CT: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

Queen's Park: 16-30 (1 goals). Inverness CT: 16-30 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Championship: 2.06 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 30%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Inverness CT are more likely to win: they have picked up 7 points in their last 5 matches, compared with just 4 for Queen's Park. The visitors average 1.5 goals per away match, while the hosts manage just 0.75 at home and have failed to score in half of those games. The quality of chances also favours Inverness, whose away xG stands at 1.18, compared with Queen's Park's 1.00 at home. The hosts have lost 3 of their 4 home matches and concede an average of 1.75 goals in them, although Inverness's 2 draws in 4 away games mean a share of the points remains a realistic outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

It is more likely that at least one team will fail to score, primarily because of Queen's Park's poor finishing. The hosts average 0.75 goals per match and have failed to score in 50% of their games, while Inverness CT average 1.5 goals and have drawn a blank in 25% of matches. The attacking gap has also been clear over their last five outings: Queen's Park averaged 0.6 goals, compared with 1.6 for the visitors. The case for BTTS - Yes is supported by the fact that Inverness CT concede an average of 1.5 goals, but BTTS has landed in only 25% of the hosts' matches, compared with 36% across the league. Therefore, despite the visitors' attacking threat, Queen's Park failing to score remains the main risk to BTTS.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

In the teams’ matches to date, at least 2 goals have been scored in 75% of cases, providing the strongest signal for Over 1.5 goals. Inverness average 1.5 goals per match, while Queen's Park score 0.75, but have conceded an average of 1.4 goals across their last 5 games. On the other hand, all of Queen's Park’s matches to date have finished Under 2.5 goals, and the league average is 2.02 goals, making higher goal lines less convincing. The 2.3-goal forecast accounts for both the visitors’ attacking potential and the more cautious pattern in the hosts’ matches; Over 1.5 goals is the preferred play.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

In their last five matches, Queen's Park have yet to lead at the break and were trailing at half-time in three of those five games, while Inverness led in two. During this run, the hosts averaged just 0.2 goals before half-time and conceded 1.2, pointing to a greater chance of the visitors taking an early lead. Inverness have recently scored 1.6 goals per match compared with Queen's Park's 0.6, and averaged 1.0 goals after the break against the hosts' 0.4, giving them a case for maintaining their advantage until the final whistle. The forecast is tempered by the hosts' higher xG, at 1.29 compared with the visitors' 1.18, but given both teams' current scoring form, Inverness to lead at half-time and win remains the most likely HT/FT outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

33Possession (%)67
Queen's ParkInverness CT
6Shots23
Queen's ParkInverness CT
5Shots on target9
Queen's ParkInverness CT
0.95xG2.64
Queen's ParkInverness CT
5Corners11
Queen's ParkInverness CT
29Dangerous attacks79
Queen's ParkInverness CT
9Fouls11
Queen's ParkInverness CT
1Cards1
Queen's ParkInverness CT

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Queen's ParkInverness CT
0.44Goals scored / match1.22
Queen's ParkInverness CT
1.67Goals conceded / match1
Queen's ParkInverness CT
44%Average possession54%
Queen's ParkInverness CT
2.22Shots on target / match4.56
Queen's ParkInverness CT

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

4.78Shots per match8.67
Queen's ParkInverness CT
2.22Shots on target4.56
Queen's ParkInverness CT
9.3%Shot conversion14.1%
Queen's ParkInverness CT
44%Possession54%
Queen's ParkInverness CT
0.81xG for1.26
Queen's ParkInverness CT
1.54xG against0.95
Queen's ParkInverness CT

Shooting quality

Queen's Park: BalancedInverness CT: Efficient finishing
Queen's ParkInverness CT
Accuracy (shots on target)46%53%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.200.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Inverness CT is 233% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Queen's Park · 2 pts / match - Inverness CT

Queen's Park
WLLLL
Season result split
11% W11% D78% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-7
0.44 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-3
Last 5 at home
1-0-3
LLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 0.97Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Inverness CT
LWDWW
Season result split
33% W44% D22% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-4-2
1.44 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-1
Last 5 away
1-2-1
DLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 0.97BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Inverness CT is 177% better for: goals scored per match.

0.44 goals / match - Queen's Park · 1.22 goals / match - Inverness CT

Inverness CT is 67% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.67 goals / match - Queen's Park · 1 goals / match - Inverness CT

Queen's Park scoring profile: more difficult

Queen's Park scores in 33% of matches (3 of 9 matches), while Inverness CT keeps a clean sheet in 44% (4 of 9 matches).

Inverness CT scoring profile: very strong

Inverness CT scores in 67% of matches (6 of 9 matches), while Queen's Park keeps a clean sheet in 11% (1 of 9 matches).

4Goals scored (season)11
Queen's ParkInverness CT
15Goals conceded (season)9
Queen's ParkInverness CT
2.11Average goals in match2.22
Queen's ParkInverness CT
3Goals scored (last 5)9
Queen's ParkInverness CT
9Goals conceded (last 5)5
Queen's ParkInverness CT

How often they score at least...

33%1 goal67%
Queen's ParkInverness CT
11%2 goals44%
Queen's ParkInverness CT
0%3 goals11%
Queen's ParkInverness CT
0%4 goals0%
Queen's ParkInverness CT

How often they concede at least...

89%1 goal56%
Queen's ParkInverness CT
78%2 goals33%
Queen's ParkInverness CT
0%3 goals11%
Queen's ParkInverness CT
0%4 goals0%
Queen's ParkInverness CT

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

38%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time11%
Queen's ParkInverness CT
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Queen's ParkInverness CT
11%Scored in both halves22%
Queen's ParkInverness CT

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
Queen's ParkInverness CT
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Queen's ParkInverness CT
40%BTTS - last 540%
Queen's ParkInverness CT

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time78%
Queen's ParkInverness CT
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time22%
Queen's ParkInverness CT
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
Queen's ParkInverness CT

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
Queen's ParkInverness CT
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time22%
Queen's ParkInverness CT
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
Queen's ParkInverness CT

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Inverness CT is 177% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.44 pts / match - Queen's Park · 1.22 pts / match - Inverness CT

Queen's Park - half-time state
0% leading44% draw56% trailing
Inverness CT - half-time state
33% leading22% draw44% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.44Points per match (1st half)1.22
Queen's ParkInverness CT
0.11Goals scored (1st half)0.56
Queen's ParkInverness CT
0.89Goals conceded (1st half)0.56
Queen's ParkInverness CT
1Average goals (1st half)1.11
Queen's ParkInverness CT
33%Clean sheet before half-time44%
Queen's ParkInverness CT
89%No goal before half-time67%
Queen's ParkInverness CT

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.67
Queen's ParkInverness CT
0.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
Queen's ParkInverness CT
0.78Goals conceded (2nd half)0.44
Queen's ParkInverness CT
1.11Average goals (2nd half)1.11
Queen's ParkInverness CT
44%Clean sheet after half-time67%
Queen's ParkInverness CT
67%No goal after half-time44%
Queen's ParkInverness CT

Queen's Park - second-half results

22% W33% D44% L
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.44
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Inverness CT - second-half results

44% W33% D22% L
11
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.22
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Queen's Park - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.201.40
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match1.40.4
Average goals in match1.60.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet0%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-60
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Inverness CT - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.00
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.61.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Queen's Park
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
2
16-30
0
4
31-45
1
3
46-60
1
2
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Inverness CT
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
3
4
16-30
1
0
31-45
2
2
46-60
3
0
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.17
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.7 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
39%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
22%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
22%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Queen's Park

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.73
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.50
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
38%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
188%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Inverness CT

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
137%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.56
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
9% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
9%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Championship).

Teams vs league

Queen's ParkLigaInverness CT
Average goals in match• 2.112.06▲ 2.22
Both teams scored▼ 33%38%▲ 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 33%30%▲ 33%
Clean sheets▼ 11%35%▲ 44%
Goal before half-time• 67%68%▲ 78%
Goal after half-time▲ 78%68%• 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.06
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.17
Home goals / match
0.89
Away goals / match
+31%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Inverness CTGoalGraeme Shinnie
  2. Queen's ParkGoalAidan ConnollyAssist: Lewis Stewart
  3. Queen's ParkGoalAidan ConnollyAssist: Michael Ruth
  4. Queen's ParkSubstitutionOn: Callum SmithOff: Ben Brannan
  5. Queen's ParkYellow cardMichael Ruth
  6. Inverness CTYellow cardLayton Stewart
  7. Inverness CTSubstitutionOn: Detlef Esapa OsongOff: Layton Stewart
  8. Inverness CTSubstitutionOn: David WotherspoonOff: Adam Mackinnon

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Queen's Park vs Inverness CT?

The Championship match finished Queen's Park 2:1 Inverness CT. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Queen's Park vs Inverness CT?

Queen's Park score 0.44 goals per game on average and Inverness CT 1.22. The Championship average is 2.06 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Queen's Park's matches and 44% of Inverness CT's.

What form are Queen's Park and Inverness CT in?

Over the last 5 games Queen's Park have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Inverness CT 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Queen's Park vs Inverness CT?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.