Scotland - ChampionshipData current as of 07 September 2026

Match suspended or postponed

The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.

Queen's Park vs Ross County: match statistics

Queen's Park vs Ross County: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Queen's Park play Ross County in Championship (Scotland). The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.

Current form

Queen's Park: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Ross County: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Queen's Park scores 1.10 and concedes 1.62 goals per match. Ross County scores 0.95 and concedes 1.73. League average: 2.50 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Queen's Park 67%, Ross County 45%. Over 2.5: Queen's Park 57%, Ross County 50%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

Ross County has higher xG: 1.37 vs 0.99. Queen's Park: 7.6 shots per match, Ross County: 11.9.

Match halves

Queen's Park: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.57. Ross County: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Queen's Park: 76-90+ (8 goals). Ross County: 0-15 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Championship: 2.50 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Queen's ParkRoss County
1.1Goals scored / match0.95
Queen's ParkRoss County
1.62Goals conceded / match1.73
Queen's ParkRoss County
44%Average possession47%
Queen's ParkRoss County
3.05Shots on target / match3.91
Queen's ParkRoss County

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.62Shots per match11.86
Queen's ParkRoss County
3.05Shots on target3.91
Queen's ParkRoss County
14.4%Shot conversion8%
Queen's ParkRoss County
44%Possession47%
Queen's ParkRoss County
0.99xG for1.37
Queen's ParkRoss County
1.69xG against1.58
Queen's ParkRoss County

Shooting quality

Queen's Park: Counter-attackingRoss County: Balanced
Queen's ParkRoss County
Accuracy (shots on target)40%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Queen's Park is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Queen's Park · 1.4 pts / match - Ross County

Queen's Park
DWDLW
Season result split
19% W43% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-9-8
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-5-3
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
DWDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.15Opponent xG: 1.56BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Ross County
LDWWL
Season result split
18% W32% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-7-11
0.86 pts / match · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-5-4
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Queen's Park is 16% better for: goals scored per match.

1.1 goals / match - Queen's Park · 0.95 goals / match - Ross County

Queen's Park is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.62 goals / match - Queen's Park · 1.73 goals / match - Ross County

Queen's Park scoring profile: very strong

Queen's Park scores in 71% of matches (15 of 21 matches), while Ross County keeps a clean sheet in 23% (5 of 22 matches).

Ross County scoring profile: strong

Ross County scores in 59% of matches (13 of 22 matches), while Queen's Park keeps a clean sheet in 24% (5 of 21 matches).

23Goals scored (season)21
Queen's ParkRoss County
34Goals conceded (season)38
Queen's ParkRoss County
2.71Average goals in match2.68
Queen's ParkRoss County
9Goals scored (last 5)3
Queen's ParkRoss County
8Goals conceded (last 5)4
Queen's ParkRoss County

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal59%
Queen's ParkRoss County
29%2 goals27%
Queen's ParkRoss County
10%3 goals9%
Queen's ParkRoss County
0%4 goals0%
Queen's ParkRoss County

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal77%
Queen's ParkRoss County
38%2 goals59%
Queen's ParkRoss County
24%3 goals23%
Queen's ParkRoss County
19%4 goals5%
Queen's ParkRoss County

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

51%
League average

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time18%
Queen's ParkRoss County
0%BTTS in both halves14%
Queen's ParkRoss County
19%Scored in both halves18%
Queen's ParkRoss County

BTTS and goal count

48%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
Queen's ParkRoss County
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
Queen's ParkRoss County
80%BTTS - last 50%
Queen's ParkRoss County

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
Queen's ParkRoss County
48%Min. 2 goals before half-time27%
Queen's ParkRoss County
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
Queen's ParkRoss County

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
Queen's ParkRoss County
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Queen's ParkRoss County
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time23%
Queen's ParkRoss County

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Queen's Park is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.19 pts / match - Queen's Park · 1.09 pts / match - Ross County

Queen's Park - half-time state
24% leading48% draw29% trailing
Ross County - half-time state
23% leading41% draw36% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.19Points per match (1st half)1.09
Queen's ParkRoss County
0.52Goals scored (1st half)0.45
Queen's ParkRoss County
0.86Goals conceded (1st half)0.64
Queen's ParkRoss County
1.38Average goals (1st half)1.09
Queen's ParkRoss County
48%Clean sheet before half-time45%
Queen's ParkRoss County
52%No goal before half-time68%
Queen's ParkRoss County

After half-time (2nd half)

1.1Points per match (2nd half)0.68
Queen's ParkRoss County
0.57Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
Queen's ParkRoss County
0.76Goals conceded (2nd half)1.09
Queen's ParkRoss County
1.33Average goals (2nd half)1.59
Queen's ParkRoss County
48%Clean sheet after half-time27%
Queen's ParkRoss County
57%No goal after half-time55%
Queen's ParkRoss County

Queen's Park - second-half results

24% W38% R38% P
25
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.19
PPG before half-time
Lead holding79%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 19%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ross County - second-half results

14% W27% R59% P
24
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding78%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 18%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Queen's Park - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.40
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match2.01.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Ross County - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.80.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Queen's Park
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
2
7
16-30
7
7
31-45
1
3
46-60
3
4
61-75
8
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Ross County
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
3
5
16-30
3
5
31-45
4
8
46-60
3
7
61-75
4
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.70
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+11%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Queen's Park

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.70
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
138%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

Ross County

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.57
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
129%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.54
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Championship).

Teams vs league

Queen's ParkLigaRoss County
Average goals in match 2.712.50 2.68
Both teams scored 67%51% 45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 57%46% 50%
Clean sheets 24%30% 23%
Goal before half-time 71%70% 68%
Goal after half-time 71%73% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.50
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / match
1.17
Away goals / match
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Lloyd WilsonMatches officiated: 12
5.25Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 225%Home wins25%Draws50%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Queen's Park 1 - 0 - 0 Ross County. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Ross County FC
1 : 2
Queen's Park FC