Scotland - ChampionshipOchilview ParkData current as of 21 October 2026

Queen's Park vs Stenhousemuir: match statistics

Queen's Park crest
Queen's Park
0 : 2half-time 0:0
Stenhousemuir crest
Stenhousemuir

Queen's Park vs Stenhousemuir: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Queen's Park played Stenhousemuir in Championship (Scotland). The match was played on 22 August 2026. Venue: Ochilview Park. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Queen's Park: 0-0-2, 0.00 points/match. Stenhousemuir: 1-1-0, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Queen's Park scores 0.50 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. Stenhousemuir scores 1.50 and concedes 0.50. League average: 1.64 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Queen's Park 50%, Stenhousemuir 50%. Over 2.5: Queen's Park 50%, Stenhousemuir 0%. League level: BTTS 36%, Over 2.5 9%.

xG, shots and style

Stenhousemuir has higher xG: 1.08 vs 0.94. Queen's Park: 6.0 shots per match, Stenhousemuir: 6.5.

Match halves

Queen's Park: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.50. Stenhousemuir: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Queen's Park: 76-90+ (1 goals). Stenhousemuir: 16-30 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Championship: 1.64 goals per match, BTTS 36%, Over 2.5 9%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Stenhousemuir sit higher in the table, 3rd compared with Queen's Park in 10th, and remain unbeaten in their last 5 matches, recording 2 wins and 3 draws. The hosts have lost both of their league matches so far, while at home they have conceded an average of 2 goals per game and scored just 1. Nevertheless, the visitors’ away figures do not justify a confident prediction of their victory: they have drawn 100% of their matches on the road, and their average xG is only 0.80. Queen's Park create slightly more quality chances at home, with an average xG of 1.05, while Stenhousemuir allow opponents an xG of 2.21. Both teams have scored in every match played in their respective conditions, but the visitors’ limited finishing efficiency and draw-heavy trend point towards a share of the points.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both teams to score is moderately positive, as Queen’s Park recorded BTTS in 60% of their last five matches, compared with 40% for Stenhousemuir. During this period, the hosts averaged 1.4 goals scored and 1.4 conceded, while the visitors scored 1.2 goals per match, giving them a realistic route to finding the net. Queen’s Park should also create chances against the opposition defence: Stenhousemuir allow an average xG of 2.21, while the hosts generate an xG of 1.36. This is not a particularly strong pick, as only 30% of matches in the league have featured BTTS, and the visitors conceded just 0.6 goals on average across their last five games. However, the attacking output and the hosts’ recent defensive record marginally favour the BTTS - Yes scenario.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Seasonal data points to a cautious goals profile: both teams had 100% of their matches finish below 2.5 and below 3.5 goals, while the league-wide average is just 1.6 goals. Stenhousemuir score an average of 1.0 goals, with an xG of 0.80 and just 5 shots per match, which limits their contribution to a high-scoring game. Queen's Park have greater attacking potential, averaging 2.0 goals, while their opponents allow an xG of 2.21; however, the hosts’ current five-match xG average is only 1.33. In their last five matches, Stenhousemuir conceded just 0.6 goals per game, while only 20% of their matches went over 2.5 goals. The projected 2.20 goals leaves a clear margin below the 3.5 line, making Under 3.5 the safest pick.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Queen’s Park victory at full-time, as both teams were level at the break in 100% of the available matches in the current sample. The hosts improve markedly after the interval: they average 2.0 goals in the second half, concede none, and won the second half in 100% of these matches. Stenhousemuir average no goals after half-time, while in their last five appearances they scored just 0.6 goals in the second halves, failing to score in 60% of those matches. Queen’s Park’s advantage is also evident in their attacking potential: their xG stands at 1.36 compared with 0.80 for their opponents, while the opposition allows an average xG of 2.21. Although Stenhousemuir’s recent form has been stable, with 2 wins and 3 draws, the hosts have stronger conditions to settle an evenly matched first half after the break.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
1Shots2
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
0Shots on target5
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
0.28xG0.83
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
4Corners7
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
28Dangerous attacks48
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
13Fouls13
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
1Cards2
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
0.5Goals scored / match1.5
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
2Goals conceded / match0.5
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
41%Average possession68%
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
3Shots on target / match3.5
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6Shots per match6.5
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
3Shots on target3.5
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
8.3%Shot conversion23.1%
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
41%Possession68%
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
0.94xG for1.08
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
1.91xG against1.68
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir

Shooting quality

Queen's Park: BalancedStenhousemuir: Efficient finishing
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
Accuracy (shots on target)50%54%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.170.43

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Queen's Park
LL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W0% D100% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-0-2
0.00 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-2
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 at home
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.5Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 0.94Opponent xG: 1.91BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%
Stenhousemuir
DW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W50% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 away
0-1-0
D
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 0.5xG: 1.08Opponent xG: 1.68BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 0%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Stenhousemuir is 200% better for: goals scored per match.

0.5 goals / match - Queen's Park · 1.5 goals / match - Stenhousemuir

Stenhousemuir is 300% better for: goals conceded per match.

2 goals / match - Queen's Park · 0.5 goals / match - Stenhousemuir

Queen's Park scoring profile: mixed

Queen's Park scores in 50% of matches (1 of 2 matches), while Stenhousemuir keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

Stenhousemuir scoring profile: very strong

Stenhousemuir scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Queen's Park keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).

1Goals scored (season)3
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
4Goals conceded (season)1
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
2.5Average goals in match2
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
1Goals scored (last 5)3
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
4Goals conceded (last 5)1
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal100%
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
0%2 goals50%
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
0%3 goals0%
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
0%4 goals0%
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal50%
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
100%2 goals0%
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
0%3 goals0%
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
0%4 goals0%
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

36%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time50%
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
0%Scored in both halves0%
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
50%BTTS - last 550%
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
100%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Stenhousemuir is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.5 pts / match - Queen's Park · 1 pts / match - Stenhousemuir

Queen's Park - half-time state
0% leading50% draw50% trailing
Stenhousemuir - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.5Points per match (1st half)1
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
0Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
0.5Average goals (1st half)1
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
50%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
100%No goal before half-time50%
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir

After half-time (2nd half)

0.5Points per match (2nd half)2
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)1
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
1.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
2Average goals (2nd half)1
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
0%Clean sheet after half-time100%
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir
50%No goal after half-time50%
Queen's ParkStenhousemuir

Queen's Park - second-half results

0% W50% D50% L
1
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Stenhousemuir - second-half results

50% W50% D0% L
2
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Queen's Park - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.500.50
Goals scored / match0.00.5
Goals conceded / match0.51.5
Average goals in match0.52.0
1 goal50%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%0%
No goal100%50%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 50% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 50% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Stenhousemuir - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.00
Goals scored / match0.51.0
Goals conceded / match0.50.0
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal50%50%
2 goals50%50%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%100%
No goal50%50%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 50% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Queen's Park
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
2
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Stenhousemuir
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.25
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.5 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
137%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Queen's Park

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.97
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.53
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
46%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
364%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
100% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
100%

Stenhousemuir

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.60
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.60
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+1.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
273%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
46%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Championship).

Teams vs league

Queen's ParkLigaStenhousemuir
Average goals in match▲ 2.501.64▲ 2.00
Both teams scored▲ 50%36%▲ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 50%9%▼ 0%
Clean sheets▼ 0%41%▲ 50%
Goal before half-time▼ 50%55%▼ 50%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%55%▼ 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.64
Average goals per match
36%
Both teams scored
9%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
41%
Clean sheets
1.09
Home goals / match
0.55
Away goals / match
+98%
Home attack advantage
+50%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
55%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
0%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
55%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
0%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Queen's ParkSubstitutionOn: Nikolay TodorovOff: Tyrece McDonnell
  2. StenhousemuirGoalEwan O'ReillyAssist: Finn Robson
  3. StenhousemuirYellow cardKinlay Bilham
  4. StenhousemuirSubstitutionOn: Oscar MacIntyreOff: Kinlay Bilham
  5. Queen's ParkSubstitutionOn: Oliver FisherOff: Ricki Lamie
  6. StenhousemuirYellow cardAngus Stevenson
  7. StenhousemuirSubstitutionOn: Matthew AitkenOff: Dale Carrick
  8. StenhousemuirSubstitutionOn: Gregor BuchananOff: Leyton Grant
  9. StenhousemuirGoalGregor BuchananAssist: Scott Bright

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Queen's Park vs Stenhousemuir?

The Championship match finished Queen's Park 0:2 Stenhousemuir. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Queen's Park vs Stenhousemuir?

Queen's Park score 0.50 goals per game on average and Stenhousemuir 1.50. The Championship average is 1.64 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 9% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Queen's Park's matches and 50% of Stenhousemuir's.

What form are Queen's Park and Stenhousemuir in?

Over the last 5 games Queen's Park have a 0-0-2 record (0.00 points per game) and Stenhousemuir 1-1-0 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Queen's Park vs Stenhousemuir?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Queen's Park vs Stenhousemuir: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.