England - ChampionshipMATRADE Loftus RoadData current as of 18 October 2026

Queens Park Rangers vs Middlesbrough: match statistics

Queens Park Rangers vs Middlesbrough: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Queens Park Rangers played Middlesbrough in Championship (England). The match was played on 5 September 2026. Venue: MATRADE Loftus Road. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Queens Park Rangers: 3-1-0, 2.50 points/match. Middlesbrough: 2-1-1, 1.75 points/match.

Goal statistics

Queens Park Rangers scores 1.75 and concedes 0.75 goals per match. Middlesbrough scores 1.75 and concedes 1.25. League average: 2.94 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Queens Park Rangers 75%, Middlesbrough 100%. Over 2.5: Queens Park Rangers 75%, Middlesbrough 75%. League level: BTTS 73%, Over 2.5 67%.

xG, shots and style

Queens Park Rangers has higher xG: 1.90 vs 1.89. Queens Park Rangers: 17.5 shots per match, Middlesbrough: 17.5.

Match halves

Queens Park Rangers: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.75. Middlesbrough: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.25.

Goals by minute

Queens Park Rangers: 31-45+ (4 goals). Middlesbrough: 61-75 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Championship: 2.94 goals per match, BTTS 73%, Over 2.5 67%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Queens Park Rangers remain unbeaten this season, with a record of 2 wins and 1 draw, having conceded just 2 goals, although their only home match ended in a 0:0 draw. The hosts create very good chances at home, as evidenced by an xG of 2.39 against just 0.31 xG conceded to their opponents, while also averaging 18 shots and 10 shots on target. Middlesbrough, however, have clearly superior current momentum: they have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scored 10 goals during that run and average 2.4 points per game. The visitors generate a high away xG of 2.24 and dominate possession at 71%, but they lost their only away match so far and concede an average of 2 goals on the road. The clash between QPR’s solid defence and Middlesbrough’s attacking form points to a closely contested encounter, with a draw the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both teams to score is clear: both Queens Park Rangers and Middlesbrough have had BTTS in 100% of their matches so far this season, compared with the league average of 78%. The hosts average 2.5 goals scored and 1.0 conceded at home, while Middlesbrough average 1.0 goal scored away from home but allow opponents 2.0 goals. Neither side has kept a single clean sheet yet, strengthening the likelihood that both teams will find the net. In their last five matches, BTTS occurred 80% of the time for both teams, while their average xG stands at 1.83 for QPR and 2.04 for Middlesbrough. The biggest risk to the pick is Middlesbrough’s low 5% finishing rate, but their high tally of 22 shots and away xG of 2.24 support the expectation of at least one goal from the visitors.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The profile of both teams points to a match with clear goal-scoring potential: in their last 5 matches, QPR averaged 1.6 goals, while Middlesbrough averaged 2.0. The visitors also created chances worth an average of 2.04 xG, compared with 1.83 xG for the hosts, supporting a forecast of around 3.05 total goals. In the last five matches involving both teams, both sides scored in 80% of cases, while the 2.5-goal line was exceeded in 60% of QPR matches and 80% of Middlesbrough matches. In addition, the hosts averaged 2.5 goals at home, while Middlesbrough conceded 2.0 goals away from home, making Over 1.5 the strongest pick with a low two-goal threshold.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Middlesbrough win, as QPR were level at the break in as many as 60% of their last five matches, compared with 40% for the visitors. The opening stages should be cautious: the hosts averaged 0.6 goals scored before half-time, while Middlesbrough averaged 0.4, with 0.4 and 0.2 goals conceded respectively. After the break, the advantage in current form shifts to the visitors, who won 80% of their last five matches and averaged 1.6 goals in second halves, compared with QPR’s 1.0. The hosts do have an excellent home record, scoring an average of 2.5 goals per match, but Middlesbrough average 22 shots and have the higher xG, 2.24 compared with 2.03, which further strengthens the likelihood of a post-half-time turnaround.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
16Shots16
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
5Shots on target6
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
1.8xG1.7
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
12Corners3
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
62Dangerous attacks37
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
3Fouls7
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
1Cards2
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
1.75Goals scored / match1.75
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
0.75Goals conceded / match1.25
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
46%Average possession63%
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
6.5Shots on target / match4.5
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

17.5Shots per match17.5
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
6.5Shots on target4.5
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
10%Shot conversion10%
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
46%Possession63%
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
1.9xG for1.89
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
1.21xG against1.17
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough

Shooting quality

Queens Park Rangers: AttackingMiddlesbrough: Dominant
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
Accuracy (shots on target)37%26%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Queens Park Rangers is 43% better for: last-5 form.

2.5 pts / match - Queens Park Rangers · 1.75 pts / match - Middlesbrough

Queens Park Rangers
WDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
75% W25% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-0
2.50 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-0
2.50 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-0
Last 5 at home
1-1-0
DW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.90Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 75%Over 2.5: 75%
Middlesbrough
WLWD
Season result split
50% W25% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-1
Last 5 away
0-1-1
LD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 1.89Opponent xG: 1.17BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 75%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Queens Park Rangers is 67% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.75 goals / match - Queens Park Rangers · 1.25 goals / match - Middlesbrough

Queens Park Rangers scoring profile: very strong

Queens Park Rangers scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while Middlesbrough keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 matches).

Middlesbrough scoring profile: very strong

Middlesbrough scores in 100% of matches (4 of 4 matches), while Queens Park Rangers keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).

7Goals scored (season)7
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
3Goals conceded (season)5
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
2.5Average goals in match3
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
7Goals scored (last 5)7
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
3Goals conceded (last 5)5
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal100%
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
75%2 goals50%
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
25%3 goals25%
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
0%4 goals0%
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal100%
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
0%2 goals25%
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
0%3 goals0%
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
0%4 goals0%
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

75%
Queens Park Rangers - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.3 of 4 matches
73%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time0%
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
25%Scored in both halves0%
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough

BTTS and goal count

75%Min. 3 goals and BTTS75%
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
75%BTTS - last 5100%
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough

2nd half

50%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time75%
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Queens Park Rangers is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / match - Queens Park Rangers · 1.75 pts / match - Middlesbrough

Queens Park Rangers - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing
Middlesbrough - half-time state
50% leading25% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)1.75
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
1Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
0.25Goals conceded (1st half)0.25
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
1.25Average goals (1st half)0.75
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
75%Clean sheet before half-time75%
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
50%No goal before half-time50%
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per match (2nd half)1.5
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
0.75Goals scored (2nd half)1.25
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
1.25Average goals (2nd half)2.25
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
50%Clean sheet after half-time25%
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
50%No goal after half-time50%
Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough

Queens Park Rangers - second-half results

25% W75% D0% L
8
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 75%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Middlesbrough - second-half results

50% W0% D50% L
7
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.8

Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Queens Park Rangers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.50
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.30.5
Average goals in match1.31.3
1 goal50%50%
2 goals25%50%
3 goals25%25%
Clean sheet75%50%
No goal50%50%
Goal difference+3+1
Half-time: 50% leading - 50% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 75% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 4
Middlesbrough - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.751.50
Goals scored / match0.51.3
Goals conceded / match0.31.0
Average goals in match0.82.3
1 goal75%100%
2 goals0%75%
3 goals0%25%
Clean sheet75%25%
No goal50%50%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 50% leading - 25% draw - 25% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 0% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Queens Park Rangers
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
4
0
31-45
2
1
46-60
1
1
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Middlesbrough
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
3
46-60
2
1
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
88%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+45%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
75%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Queens Park Rangers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.69
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.46
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
109%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
56%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Middlesbrough

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.72
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
132%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Championship).

Teams vs league

Queens Park RangersLigaMiddlesbrough
Average goals in match▼ 2.502.94• 3.00
Both teams scored▲ 75%73%▲ 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 75%67%▲ 75%
Clean sheets▲ 25%18%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▼ 50%80%▼ 75%
Goal after half-time▼ 50%78%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.94
Average goals per match
73%
Both teams scored
67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
18%
Clean sheets
1.61
Home goals / match
1.33
Away goals / match
+21%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
8%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Queens Park RangersSubstitutionOn: Koki SaitoOff: Ilias Chair
  2. MiddlesbroughGoalWill LankshearAssist: Callum Brittain
  3. Queens Park RangersSubstitutionOn: Rumarn BurrellOff: Richard Kone
  4. MiddlesbroughYellow cardAdilson Malanda
  5. MiddlesbroughSubstitutionOn: Alfie JonesOff: Maximilian Arfsten
  6. MiddlesbroughSubstitutionOn: Luke David AylingOff: Ashley Phillips
  7. MiddlesbroughYellow cardCallum Brittain
  8. MiddlesbroughSubstitutionOn: Rokas Puku0161tasOff: Sebastian Berhalter
  9. Queens Park RangersYellow cardGlen Kamara

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Queens Park Rangers 0 - 0 - 2 Middlesbrough. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Queens Park Rangers vs Middlesbrough?

The Championship match finished Queens Park Rangers 0:1 Middlesbrough. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Queens Park Rangers and Middlesbrough?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Queens Park Rangers won 0, Middlesbrough won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Queens Park Rangers vs Middlesbrough?

Queens Park Rangers score 1.75 goals per game on average and Middlesbrough 1.75. The Championship average is 2.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Queens Park Rangers's matches and 100% of Middlesbrough's.

What form are Queens Park Rangers and Middlesbrough in?

Over the last 5 games Queens Park Rangers have a 3-1-0 record (2.50 points per game) and Middlesbrough 2-1-1 (1.75 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Queens Park Rangers vs Middlesbrough?

The statistical background for Queens Park Rangers vs Middlesbrough — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.