Queens Park Rangers vs Preston North End: match statistics
Queens Park Rangers vs Preston North End: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Queens Park Rangers played Preston North End in Championship (England). The match was played on 19 September 2026. Venue: MATRADE Loftus Road. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
Queens Park Rangers: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Preston North End: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Queens Park Rangers scores 1.14 and concedes 0.71 goals per match. Preston North End scores 0.86 and concedes 1.86. League average: 2.86 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Queens Park Rangers 57%, Preston North End 71%. Over 2.5: Queens Park Rangers 43%, Preston North End 71%. League level: BTTS 67%, Over 2.5 63%.
xG, shots and style
Queens Park Rangers has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.36. Queens Park Rangers: 15.0 shots per match, Preston North End: 12.9.
Match halves
Queens Park Rangers: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.43. Preston North End: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.43.
Goals by minute
Queens Park Rangers: 31-45+ (5 goals). Preston North End: 0-15 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Championship: 2.86 goals per match, BTTS 67%, Over 2.5 63%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Queens Park Rangers sit 6th, while Preston North End are only 23rd, and the full-season record clearly favours the hosts: 3 wins, 3 draws and 1 defeat compared with the visitors’ 1 win and 6 defeats. QPR have collected 8 points from their last five matches thanks to two wins and two draws, whereas Preston have lost 4 of their 5 games and earned just 3 points. At home, the hosts create a high volume of chances, averaging 18 shots and 6.33 on target per match, with an xG of 2.00, while Preston allow opponents an average xG of 1.59 away from home. QPR’s defence also looks more solid, conceding an average of 0.67 goals at home, whereas the visitors have lost every away fixture, conceding 1.67 goals on average. The hosts’ main weakness is their lack of finishing, as they have failed to score in 67% of home matches; therefore, alongside a QPR win, the relatively high risk of a draw should also be taken into account.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
BTTS - Yes is the most likely outcome, as both teams have regularly played matches featuring a goal from each side this season: QPR in 75% and Preston in 67% of their games. Neither team has kept a clean sheet yet, with the hosts conceding an average of 2.00 goals and the visitors 1.67. Preston scores only 0.67 goals per match, but its average xG is 1.34, while QPR allows opponents an xG of 1.39, giving the visitors a realistic route to scoring. The hosts have an xG of 1.38, while Preston’s defense allows opponents 1.59 xG and has conceded an average of 1.60 goals over the last 5 matches. Recent form on both sides lowers the signal to 60% of matches ending with BTTS, but the combination of weak defenses and solid xG figures still clearly supports the “yes” option.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model expects 2.52 goals, as QPR generate an average of 1.38 xG, while Preston allow opponents 1.59 xG. The visitors produce 1.34 xG per match, whereas the hosts concede an average of 2.00 goals, which also increases the likelihood of them finding the net. Neither team has kept a clean sheet yet, and at least 2 goals were scored in 75% of QPR’s matches and 67% of Preston’s games. In their last five appearances, both teams recorded matches with both sides scoring in 60% of cases, despite QPR conceding only 0.8 goals per match during that period. Over 1.5 is the strongest selection, as it requires just two goals amid clear defensive weaknesses, while the Over 2.5 line remains more evenly balanced.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A half-time draw stands out as the strongest option, as QPR were level after 45 minutes in 60% of their last five matches, compared with 40% for Preston; during this period, both teams averaged just 0.8 goals in the first half. After the break, the advantage should shift towards the hosts: QPR have recently averaged 0.6 goals scored and 0.4 conceded, while Preston have scored just 0.2 and allowed 1.4 goals per match. The hosts are also in significantly better form in terms of results, averaging 1.6 points across their last five games compared with the visitors’ 0.6 points, with Preston losing 80% of those matches. QPR’s edge is further supported by their finishing efficiency, as despite recording a similar number of shots on target—3.0 versus 3.33—they convert 8% of their attempts into goals, compared with just 5% for Preston. The X/1 scenario best combines a cautious, low-scoring opening with a clear defensive decline from Preston in the second half.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Queens Park Rangers | Preston North End | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 24% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.22 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Queens Park Rangers is 167% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Queens Park Rangers · 0.6 pts / match - Preston North End
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Queens Park Rangers is 33% better for: goals scored per match.
1.14 goals / match - Queens Park Rangers · 0.86 goals / match - Preston North End
Queens Park Rangers is 162% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.71 goals / match - Queens Park Rangers · 1.86 goals / match - Preston North End
Queens Park Rangers scores in 57% of matches (4 of 7 matches), while Preston North End keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 7 matches).
Preston North End scores in 71% of matches (5 of 7 matches), while Queens Park Rangers keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Queens Park Rangers
Over / Under - Preston North End
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Queens Park Rangers is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.43 pts / match - Queens Park Rangers · 1.14 pts / match - Preston North End
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Queens Park Rangers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Preston North End - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 14%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Queens Park Rangers
Preston North End
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Championship).
Teams vs league
| Queens Park Rangers | Liga | Preston North End | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.86 | 2.86 | ▼ 2.71 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 57% | 67% | ▲ 71% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 43% | 63% | ▲ 71% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 29% | 21% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 78% | ▼ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 29% | 76% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Queens Park Rangers 0 - 2 - 0 Preston North End. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Queens Park Rangers vs Preston North End?
The Championship match finished Queens Park Rangers 2:2 Preston North End. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Queens Park Rangers and Preston North End?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Queens Park Rangers won 0, Preston North End won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Queens Park Rangers vs Preston North End?
Queens Park Rangers score 1.14 goals per game on average and Preston North End 0.86. The Championship average is 2.86 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Queens Park Rangers's matches and 71% of Preston North End's.
What form are Queens Park Rangers and Preston North End in?
Over the last 5 games Queens Park Rangers have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Preston North End 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Queens Park Rangers vs Preston North End?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


