Queens Park Rangers vs Swansea City: match statistics
Queens Park Rangers vs Swansea City: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Queens Park Rangers played Swansea City in Championship (England). The match was played on 21 April 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Queens Park Rangers: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Swansea City: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Queens Park Rangers scores 1.35 and concedes 1.51 goals per match. Swansea City scores 1.19 and concedes 1.30. League average: 2.56 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Queens Park Rangers 63%, Swansea City 51%. Over 2.5: Queens Park Rangers 60%, Swansea City 49%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 49%.
xG, shots and style
Queens Park Rangers has higher xG: 1.38 vs 1.33. Queens Park Rangers: 12.5 shots per match, Swansea City: 12.1.
Match halves
Queens Park Rangers: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.77. Swansea City: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.74.
Goals by minute
Queens Park Rangers: 76-90+ (17 goals). Swansea City: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Championship: 2.56 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 49%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win for Queens Park Rangers (1). At home QPR average 1.76 goals per match with xG 1.56 and 4.67 shots on target, while Swansea away score only 0.95 goals with xG 1.23 and 3.76 shots on target, which favors the home attack. Defensively QPR concede 1.52 goals at home on average, and Swansea concede 1.43 goals away, but in the last 5 matches the visitors have conceded 10 goals versus 5 conceded by QPR, indicating a decline in Swansea’s defensive form. Additionally QPR have better shot conversion (13% vs 9%) and a lower share of scoreless home matches (19% vs 38%), as well as superior recent form over the last five matches (9 goals and an average of 1.6 points per match versus 7 goals and an average of 1.0 point per match for Swansea). Based on the effectiveness advantage and number of chances, I assess QPR’s win probability at approximately 60%, draw 22% and Swansea win 18%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes because QPR has a seasonal BTTS rate of 59% and averages 1.41 goals per season (1.8 in the last 5), conceding 1.18 seasonally and 1.0 in the last 5. Swansea scores only 0.95 goals seasonally and has 38% of matches without a goal, but in the last 5 has improved to 1.4 goals per match and also records 60% BTTS in that period, conceding an average of 2.0 goals in the last 5. xG shows QPR’s edge in chance creation (xG_for 1.42 versus Swansea 1.23), while Swansea allows opponents many opportunities (xG_against 1.54 seasonally and 1.95 in the last 5). QPR averages 13.32 shots per match with an 11% conversion rate, and Swansea registers 3.76 shots on target per match, so both teams have the potential to score. Considering these numbers and the league BTTS rate of 56%, I assess the probability of BTTS at 62% (Yes) versus 38% (No).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model (1.42 xG for QPR vs 1.54 xG conceded by Swansea) yields 1.48 expected goals for the home side, while combining 1.23 xG for Swansea and 1.29 xG conceded by QPR produces 1.26 for the visitors; the total is 2.74 goals. Seasonal metrics confirm a tendency for at least 2 goals: QPR have 77% of matches Over 1.5, Swansea 71%, and both teams show Over 0.5 in 100% and 95% of games respectively. Additionally QPR average 13.3 shots per game with an 11% conversion rate (≈1.46 goals), and Swansea average 10.9 shots with a 9% conversion rate, supporting a projection of multiple goals. In last 5 matches form, QPR score 1.8 and concede 1.0 on average, while Swansea score 1.4 and concede 2.0, which increases the likelihood of goals at both ends. As a result the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5 (76% vs 24%); Over 2.5 has moderate support (62% vs 38%), while Over 3.5 appears unlikely (19% vs 81%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I expect a draw at Half-Time, because hosts led at the break in 27% of matches while visitors were level at the break in 48% of games; the average first-half goals are 1.23 for QPR and 0.95 for Swansea, which suggests an even opening act. After Half-Time I see an advantage for QPR: at home they average 1.64 points compared to Swansea’s 1.0 points away, they generate 1.42 xG at home versus the visitors’ 1.23 xG and they record 13.32 shots with an 11% conversion versus Swansea’s 10.86 shots and 9% conversion. Additionally QPR have a strong second act — on average 1.36 goals after the break and they win the second Half-Time/Full-Time segment in 45% of matches, whereas Swansea win the second half in only 24% of cases; QPR have also scored 8 goals in minutes 76–90 versus the visitors’ 5. On that basis the most likely scenario is a Half-Time draw and a home win (X/1, 30%), with the variant of the hosts leading from the start and winning (1/1) also significant (25%), and I assign low probability to scenarios where Swansea lead at the break (14% historically) and hold on to win.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Queens Park Rangers | Swansea City | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Queens Park Rangers is 60% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Queens Park Rangers · 1 pts / match - Swansea City
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Queens Park Rangers is 13% better for: goals scored per match.
1.35 goals / match - Queens Park Rangers · 1.19 goals / match - Swansea City
Swansea City is 16% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.51 goals / match - Queens Park Rangers · 1.3 goals / match - Swansea City
Queens Park Rangers scores in 72% of matches (31 of 43 matches), while Swansea City keeps a clean sheet in 28% (12 of 43 matches).
Swansea City scores in 77% of matches (33 of 43 matches), while Queens Park Rangers keeps a clean sheet in 23% (10 of 43 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Queens Park Rangers
Over / Under - Swansea City
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Queens Park Rangers is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.16 pts / match - Queens Park Rangers · 1.05 pts / match - Swansea City
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Queens Park Rangers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Swansea City - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Queens Park Rangers
Swansea City
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Championship).
Teams vs league
| Queens Park Rangers | Liga | Swansea City | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.86 | 2.56 | • 2.49 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 56% | ▼ 51% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 60% | 49% | • 49% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 23% | 25% | ▲ 28% |
| Goal before half-time | • 72% | 71% | • 72% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 70% | 76% | ▲ 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Queens Park Rangers 1 - 0 - 0 Swansea City. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Queens Park Rangers vs Swansea City?
The Championship match finished Queens Park Rangers 1:2 Swansea City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Queens Park Rangers vs Swansea City?
Queens Park Rangers score 1.35 goals per game on average and Swansea City 1.19. The Championship average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Queens Park Rangers's matches and 51% of Swansea City's.
What form are Queens Park Rangers and Swansea City in?
Over the last 5 games Queens Park Rangers have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Swansea City 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Queens Park Rangers vs Swansea City?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


