Queens Park Rangers vs Watford: match statistics
Queens Park Rangers vs Watford: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Queens Park Rangers played Watford in Championship (England). The match was played on 3 April 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Queens Park Rangers: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Watford: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Queens Park Rangers scores 1.41 and concedes 1.56 goals per match. Watford scores 1.28 and concedes 1.18. League average: 2.58 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Queens Park Rangers 64%, Watford 62%. Over 2.5: Queens Park Rangers 64%, Watford 46%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
Watford has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.38. Queens Park Rangers: 12.5 shots per match, Watford: 13.8.
Match halves
Queens Park Rangers: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.79. Watford: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.72.
Goals by minute
Queens Park Rangers: 76-90+ (16 goals). Watford: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Championship: 2.58 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Queens Park Rangers hold a clear attacking edge at home: an average of 1.84 goals scored per home match versus just 1.11 scored by Watford away. Additionally, QPR generate 1.58 xG at home with 14.11 shots per game and 4.63 on target, while Watford record 1.32 xG away with 12.47 shots and 3.58 on target, indicating higher quality and quantity of chances for the hosts. QPR also have a higher shot conversion rate of 13% versus Watford’s 9% and a 47% home win rate, whereas the visitors have only a 21% away win rate; goal difference at home is +4 for QPR and -5 for the away side. Against QPR there is a downside of conceding more goals at home (1.63 on average) and weaker recent form over the last 5 matches (2 wins and 3 losses, 1.2 points per game), while Watford have 1.6 points per game in their last 5 and a better away defensive record (1.37 goals conceded). Considering QPR’s superiority in chance creation and efficiency, and Watford’s high tendency to draw on the road (42% draws), I forecast a home win probability of 52%, draw 28% and away win 20%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS indicators favor Both Teams To Score: Queens Park Rangers have BTTS at 55%, Watford 68%, and the league BTTS rate is 56%. Recent form over the last 5 matches is mixed: QPR have only 40% BTTS in their last 5 with an average 1.8 goals scored and 1.8 conceded per match, whereas Watford have 80% BTTS, averaging 1.4 scored and 1.2 conceded. xG and offensive positioning analysis shows QPR generate xG 1.65 with average xG against 1.27, suggesting QPR should score against Watford (Watford xG against 1.37); conversely Watford have xG 1.32 while QPR concede xG 1.27 — both sides therefore have realistic scoring chances. Additionally QPR record 5.35 shots on target per match versus 3.58 for Watford and clean sheet rates of 25% versus 11%, indicating Watford less frequently keep a clean sheet, and the league goals average of 2.58 also supports an open game. Considering Watford’s seasonal BTTS advantage (68%) along with supporting xG and shot metrics, I assign higher probability to 'YES' — 70% versus 30% for 'NO'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I expect approximately 2.81 goals in the match in total (1.51 for Queens Park Rangers and 1.30 for Watford), so the safest signal is Over 1.5. QPR generate on average xG 1.65 and have 5.35 shots on target per match, while Watford have xG 1.32 and 3.58 shots on target, indicating a home creative advantage. Historically both teams rarely finish a match with fewer than one goal (Over 0.5 in 95% of cases for both), and Over 1.5 occurs for QPR in 85% of matches and for Watford in 68% — averaging about 77%. Additionally, in the last 5 matches both sides have a 60% occurrence of Over 2.5 and BTTS 55% (QPR) and 68% (Watford), which increases the likelihood of at least 2 goals and favors the over market. Consequently I indicate Over 1.5 as the primary pick (77% probability); for the 2.5 line I assign a 53% edge to the over, while Over 3.5 appears unlikely (31%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Both teams frequently draw at half-time — QPR in 45% of matches and Watford in 53% — yielding roughly a 49% probability of a half-time draw. However, by full-time QPR hold the advantage: the home side have won 50% of games compared to Watford’s 21%. QPR also record a higher xG (1.65 vs 1.32) and average 5.35 shots on target versus Watford’s 3.58. QPR score on average 0.7 goals in the second half and concede 0.45; their second-half ppg is 1.7 (vs 1.53 for the visitors), and 75% of the hosts’ matches feature at least one goal after the break — factors that support a turnaround after half-time. Considering the hosts led at the break in 30% of matches (guests only 11%), while HT draws are most common, the half-time draw / home win scenario appears strongest; I back X/1 as the optimal pick.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Queens Park Rangers | Watford | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Watford is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Queens Park Rangers · 1.6 pts / match - Watford
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Queens Park Rangers is 10% better for: goals scored per match.
1.41 goals / match - Queens Park Rangers · 1.28 goals / match - Watford
Watford is 32% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.56 goals / match - Queens Park Rangers · 1.18 goals / match - Watford
Queens Park Rangers scores in 74% of matches (29 of 39 matches), while Watford keeps a clean sheet in 18% (7 of 39 matches).
Watford scores in 74% of matches (29 of 39 matches), while Queens Park Rangers keeps a clean sheet in 23% (9 of 39 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Queens Park Rangers
Over / Under - Watford
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Queens Park Rangers is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.15 pts / match - Queens Park Rangers · 1.1 pts / match - Watford
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Queens Park Rangers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Watford - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Queens Park Rangers
Watford
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Championship).
Teams vs league
| Queens Park Rangers | Liga | Watford | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.97 | 2.58 | ▼ 2.46 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 64% | 56% | ▲ 62% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 64% | 50% | ▼ 46% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 23% | 25% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 74% | 71% | ▼ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 72% | 76% | • 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Queens Park Rangers 0 - 0 - 1 Watford. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Queens Park Rangers vs Watford?
The Championship match finished Queens Park Rangers 2:1 Watford. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Queens Park Rangers vs Watford?
Queens Park Rangers score 1.41 goals per game on average and Watford 1.28. The Championship average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Queens Park Rangers's matches and 62% of Watford's.
What form are Queens Park Rangers and Watford in?
Over the last 5 games Queens Park Rangers have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Watford 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Queens Park Rangers vs Watford?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


