Queens Park Rangers vs West Bromwich Albion: match statistics
Queens Park Rangers vs West Bromwich Albion: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Queens Park Rangers played West Bromwich Albion in Championship (England). The match was played on 6 December 2025. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
Queens Park Rangers: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. West Bromwich Albion: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Queens Park Rangers scores 1.22 and concedes 1.56 goals per match. West Bromwich Albion scores 1.11 and concedes 1.22. League average: 2.65 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Queens Park Rangers 67%, West Bromwich Albion 56%. Over 2.5: Queens Park Rangers 56%, West Bromwich Albion 44%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
Queens Park Rangers has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.46. Queens Park Rangers: 13.6 shots per match, West Bromwich Albion: 13.7.
Match halves
Queens Park Rangers: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.72. West Bromwich Albion: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 0.50.
Goals by minute
Queens Park Rangers: 76-90+ (6 goals). West Bromwich Albion: 0-15 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Championship: 2.65 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Queens Park Rangers | West Bromwich Albion | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Queens Park Rangers is 10% better for: goals scored per match.
1.22 goals / match - Queens Park Rangers · 1.11 goals / match - West Bromwich Albion
West Bromwich Albion is 28% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.56 goals / match - Queens Park Rangers · 1.22 goals / match - West Bromwich Albion
Queens Park Rangers scores in 83% of matches (15 of 18 matches), while West Bromwich Albion keeps a clean sheet in 22% (4 of 18 matches).
West Bromwich Albion scores in 72% of matches (13 of 18 matches), while Queens Park Rangers keeps a clean sheet in 28% (5 of 18 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Queens Park Rangers
Over / Under - West Bromwich Albion
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
West Bromwich Albion is 62% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.06 pts / match - Queens Park Rangers · 1.72 pts / match - West Bromwich Albion
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Queens Park Rangers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
West Bromwich Albion - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 39%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Queens Park Rangers
West Bromwich Albion
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Championship).
Teams vs league
| Queens Park Rangers | Liga | West Bromwich Albion | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.78 | 2.65 | ▼ 2.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 59% | ▼ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 56% | 52% | ▼ 44% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 28% | 23% | • 22% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 72% | 74% | ▼ 72% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 76% | ▲ 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Queens Park Rangers vs West Bromwich Albion?
The Championship match finished Queens Park Rangers 3:1 West Bromwich Albion. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Queens Park Rangers vs West Bromwich Albion?
Queens Park Rangers score 1.22 goals per game on average and West Bromwich Albion 1.11. The Championship average is 2.65 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Queens Park Rangers's matches and 56% of West Bromwich Albion's.
What form are Queens Park Rangers and West Bromwich Albion in?
Over the last 5 games Queens Park Rangers have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and West Bromwich Albion 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Queens Park Rangers vs West Bromwich Albion?
The statistical background for Queens Park Rangers vs West Bromwich Albion — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.