RAAL La Louvière vs FCV Dender EH: match statistics
RAAL La Louvière vs FCV Dender EH: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
RAAL La Louvière played FCV Dender EH in Pro League (Belgium). The match was played on 6 April 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
RAAL La Louvière: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. FCV Dender EH: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
RAAL La Louvière scores 1.00 and concedes 1.23 goals per match. FCV Dender EH scores 0.80 and concedes 1.70. League average: 2.63 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: RAAL La Louvière 53%, FCV Dender EH 57%. Over 2.5: RAAL La Louvière 43%, FCV Dender EH 50%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 47%.
xG, shots and style
FCV Dender EH has higher xG: 1.28 vs 1.19. RAAL La Louvière: 10.3 shots per match, FCV Dender EH: 10.9.
Match halves
RAAL La Louvière: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.57. FCV Dender EH: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.40.
Goals by minute
RAAL La Louvière: 76-90+ (10 goals). FCV Dender EH: 0-15 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Pro League: 2.63 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 47%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
RAAL La Louvière holds a clear seasonal advantage over FCV Dender EH: the hosts sit 14th in the table versus the visitors in 16th, having scored 30 and conceded 37, while Dender have 24 scored and a worrying 51 conceded. The hosts’ defense is stronger at home — they concede 1.07 goals per match on average, compared to 1.53 conceded by Dender away; xG against is 1.43 versus 1.81, and clean sheet rate is 47% for the hosts against 13% for the visitors. Offensive differences are smaller: home xG for RAAL is 1.35 versus 1.26 for Dender on the road, average shots 11.2 vs 10.6 and shots on target 3.67 vs 4.2, with conversion 7% for the hosts and 8% for the visitors. Recent form (last 5) also favors RAAL — 1 win, 3 draws, 1 loss, 9 goals and 1.2 pts/match, while Dender have 0 wins, 2 draws, 3 losses, 4 goals and 0.4 pts/match (the visitors conceded 11 goals in their last 5). Considering the hosts’ superior defense and the visitors’ poor away run, I forecast a home win, although RAAL’s high draw rate (47%) and 53% of their matches without conceding increase the draw risk.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Season BTTS rate stands at 53% for RAAL La Louvière and 60% for FCV Dender, with a league BTTS percentage of 54%, all favoring a Goal/Goal outcome. In the last 5 matches both teams show BTTS at 60%; RAAL scored 9 goals in that span (avg 1.8 per game) and conceded 9 (1.8), while Dender has 4 goals for (0.8) and 11 conceded (2.2), indicating the hosts’ offensive potential and the visitors’ defensive vulnerability both support BTTS. xG metrics show both sides create chances — xG_for 1.29 for RAAL versus 1.26 for Dender — but are exposed at the back: xG_against 1.59 (RAAL) and 1.81 (Dender), suggesting scoring opportunities from both ends. Additionally, only 20% and 13% of matches end in a clean sheet for RAAL and Dender respectively, and shots on target of 3.53 and 4.2 with low conversion rates of 7% and 8% indicate finishing is poor but chances are sufficient. Considering seasonal BTTS 53/60, last 5 matches 60/60, low clean sheets 20/13 and xG_against above 1.5, I assess BTTS - Yes probability at approximately 70% and No at 30%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model indicates the home team has expected goals of 1.55 (xG for 1.29 and xG against 1.81), and the away team 1.43 (xG for 1.26 and xG against 1.59), totaling 2.98 expected goals. With total xG = 2.98 a Poisson distribution implies probabilities of Over 1.5 ≈ 80%, Over 2.5 ≈ 57% and Over 3.5 ≈ 35%. Seasonal stats support this projection: both teams score at least 1 goal in 87% of matches, while both teams scored in 53% (home) and 60% (away) of matches. In the last 5 fixtures the home side averaged 1.8 goals (9 goals) and the away side 0.8 (4 goals); defensively the home team concedes 1.87 goals on average this season and the away team 1.53, which further increases the likelihood of more goals. The strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5 (80% per the model), therefore I recommend backing Over on the 1.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Hosts are stronger before the break: they lead at the break in 27% of matches and average 0.53 goals in the first half versus 0.27 for visitors. After the break the advantage shifts to the visitors — they average 0.53 goals in second halves and collect an average of 1.07 points in second halves versus 0.47 points for the hosts, with second-half wins 27% for visitors vs 7% for hosts. Given that hosts often lead at half-time but have a low seasonal win rate (7%) and a high draw rate (33%), the strongest signal is a lead at the break turning into a draw at full-time (1/X) — I assess this at 24%. Alternatively, a frequent half-time draw (47% of the hosts’ matches) makes X/X (18%) and X/2 (16%) the next most realistic options, due to the hosts’ weaker second half and the visitors’ stronger second half.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| RAAL La Louvière | FCV Dender EH | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.21 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
RAAL La Louvière is 200% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - RAAL La Louvière · 0.4 pts / match - FCV Dender EH
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
RAAL La Louvière is 25% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - RAAL La Louvière · 0.8 goals / match - FCV Dender EH
RAAL La Louvière is 38% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.23 goals / match - RAAL La Louvière · 1.7 goals / match - FCV Dender EH
RAAL La Louvière scores in 60% of matches (18 of 30 matches), while FCV Dender EH keeps a clean sheet in 17% (5 of 30 matches).
FCV Dender EH scores in 60% of matches (18 of 30 matches), while RAAL La Louvière keeps a clean sheet in 33% (10 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - RAAL La Louvière
Over / Under - FCV Dender EH
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
RAAL La Louvière is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.1 pts / match - RAAL La Louvière · 1 pts / match - FCV Dender EH
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
RAAL La Louvière - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
FCV Dender EH - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 10%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -7 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
RAAL La Louvière
FCV Dender EH
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Pro League).
Teams vs league
| RAAL La Louvière | Liga | FCV Dender EH | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.23 | 2.63 | ▼ 2.50 |
| Both teams scored | • 53% | 54% | ▲ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 43% | 47% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 27% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 72% | ▼ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 53% | 74% | ▲ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): RAAL La Louvière 0 - 1 - 1 FCV Dender EH. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of RAAL La Louvière vs FCV Dender EH?
The Pro League match finished RAAL La Louvière 0:1 FCV Dender EH. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between RAAL La Louvière and FCV Dender EH?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches RAAL La Louvière won 0, FCV Dender EH won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before RAAL La Louvière vs FCV Dender EH?
RAAL La Louvière score 1.00 goals per game on average and FCV Dender EH 0.80. The Pro League average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 53% of RAAL La Louvière's matches and 57% of FCV Dender EH's.
What form are RAAL La Louvière and FCV Dender EH in?
Over the last 5 games RAAL La Louvière have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and FCV Dender EH 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for RAAL La Louvière vs FCV Dender EH?
The statistical background for RAAL La Louvière vs FCV Dender EH — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.