Racing Club vs Atlético Tucumán: match statistics
Racing Club vs Atlético Tucumán: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Racing Club played Atlético Tucumán in Primera División (Argentina). The match was played on 7 September 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Racing Club: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Atlético Tucumán: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Racing Club scores 1.06 and concedes 0.94 goals per match. Atlético Tucumán scores 0.94 and concedes 1.25. League average: 2.08 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Racing Club 50%, Atlético Tucumán 56%. Over 2.5: Racing Club 39%, Atlético Tucumán 50%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 34%.
xG, shots and style
Atlético Tucumán has higher xG: 1.44 vs 1.37. Racing Club: 11.9 shots per match, Atlético Tucumán: 12.3.
Match halves
Racing Club: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.56. Atlético Tucumán: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.50.
Goals by minute
Racing Club: 76-90+ (8 goals). Atlético Tucumán: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Primera División: 2.08 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 34%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Racing Club have a clear advantage in terms of chance creation at home: their average xG stands at 1.61, compared with the 1.50 xG conceded by Atlético Tucumán away from home. The hosts average 14.73 shots and maintain 58% possession, while the visitors record just 9.91 attempts and 42% possession on the road. Atlético Tucumán have lost as many as 64% of their away matches and score an average of 0.91 goals in those games, supporting the case for Racing to capitalize on home advantage. Racing’s form is concerning, however, as they have scored only 4 goals and won once in their last five matches, while Atlético have conceded just 2 goals during that period. Therefore, the hosts are favorites primarily due to their superior chance-creation quality, but a low-scoring and closely contested match remains a very realistic outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Racing Club has BTTS in only 33% of its matches this season and keeps a clean sheet in 58% of games, strongly supporting the scenario in which Atlético Tucumán fail to score. The visitors average just 0.91 goals per match and fail to score in as many as 18% of their appearances, while the hosts concede only 0.67 goals per game. Atlético’s recent form is also defensive: the team has conceded only 2 goals in its last five matches, with BTTS occurring in just 20% of those games. Racing does create more chances, recording 1.58 xG and 3.92 shots on target on average compared with the opponent’s 1.18 xG and 2.73 efforts on target, but its conversion rate is only 5%, so a result with just one team scoring remains the most likely outcome. With the league BTTS average at 44%, the data for both teams—particularly Racing’s defensive strength and the visitors’ limited attacking output—supports the BTTS - No pick.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The match profile clearly favors a low number of goals: Racing average just 0.75 goals per league game, while Atlético Tucumán average 0.91. In Racing’s matches, the 3.5-goal line has not been exceeded in 92% of cases, while the same outcome occurred in 91% of Atlético’s games. The hosts keep a clean sheet in 58% of their matches, while the visitors have conceded just 0.4 goals per game across their last five matches. The chance-creation potential is slightly higher, with Racing recording 1.58 xG compared with 1.50 xG conceded by their opponents, but the hosts’ conversion rate is only 5%, limiting the extent to which chances translate into goals. The projected total of 1.95 goals indicates that Under 3.5 goals remains the safest and strongest option.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome, as Racing were level after 45 minutes in 58% of their matches, compared with 55% for Atlético Tucumán; over their last five games, these figures stood at 60% and 80%, respectively. The first halves involving both teams are typically tight: Racing average 0.33 goals scored and 0.17 conceded, while the visitors score 0.27 and concede 0.64 goals on average. Racing have a clear advantage in chance creation, with an xG of 1.58 versus the opponent’s 1.18 and an average of 13.83 shots compared with Atlético’s 9.91, although their conversion rate is only 5%. The case for a full-time draw is strengthened by Racing’s exceptionally high draw rate over the season, at 67%, combined with a low average of 1.42 total goals in their matches. Atlético have been in better form recently, earning 1.6 points per match across their last five appearances compared with Racing’s 0.8, which limits the strength of backing the home team to win after the break.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Racing Club | Atlético Tucumán | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 27% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Racing Club is 20% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Racing Club · 1 pts / match - Atlético Tucumán
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Racing Club is 13% better for: goals scored per match.
1.06 goals / match - Racing Club · 0.94 goals / match - Atlético Tucumán
Racing Club is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.94 goals / match - Racing Club · 1.25 goals / match - Atlético Tucumán
Racing Club scores in 72% of matches (13 of 18 matches), while Atlético Tucumán keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 matches).
Atlético Tucumán scores in 75% of matches (12 of 16 matches), while Racing Club keeps a clean sheet in 39% (7 of 18 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Racing Club
Over / Under - Atlético Tucumán
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Racing Club is 23% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.39 pts / match - Racing Club · 1.13 pts / match - Atlético Tucumán
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Racing Club - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Atlético Tucumán - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 19%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Racing Club
Atlético Tucumán
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Racing Club | Liga | Atlético Tucumán | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.00 | 2.08 | ▲ 2.19 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 45% | ▲ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 39% | 34% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 39% | 34% | ▼ 31% |
| Goal before half-time | • 61% | 61% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | • 72% | 71% | ▲ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Racing Club 2 - 0 - 0 Atlético Tucumán. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Racing Club vs Atlético Tucumán?
The Primera División match finished Racing Club 1:2 Atlético Tucumán. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Racing Club and Atlético Tucumán?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Racing Club won 2, Atlético Tucumán won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Racing Club vs Atlético Tucumán?
Racing Club score 1.06 goals per game on average and Atlético Tucumán 0.94. The Primera División average is 2.08 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Racing Club's matches and 56% of Atlético Tucumán's.
What form are Racing Club and Atlético Tucumán in?
Over the last 5 games Racing Club have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Atlético Tucumán 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Racing Club vs Atlético Tucumán?
The statistical background for Racing Club vs Atlético Tucumán — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


