Racing Club vs Gimnasia La Plata: match statistics
Racing Club vs Gimnasia La Plata: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Racing Club played Gimnasia La Plata in Primera División (Argentina). The match was played on 24 July 2026. Venue: Estadio Presidente Juan Domingo Perón. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Racing Club: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Gimnasia La Plata: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Racing Club scores 1.06 and concedes 0.94 goals per match. Gimnasia La Plata scores 1.11 and concedes 1.17. League average: 2.08 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Racing Club 50%, Gimnasia La Plata 39%. Over 2.5: Racing Club 39%, Gimnasia La Plata 44%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 34%.
xG, shots and style
Racing Club has higher xG: 1.37 vs 1.28. Racing Club: 11.9 shots per match, Gimnasia La Plata: 11.1.
Match halves
Racing Club: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.56. Gimnasia La Plata: half-time lead 56%, second-half goals 0.28.
Goals by minute
Racing Club: 76-90+ (8 goals). Gimnasia La Plata: 0-15 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Primera División: 2.08 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 34%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win based on superiority in chance creation and xG quality. Racing at home averages 1.54 xG and 13.71 shots per match (3.29 on target) with 56% possession, translating to 1.0 goals per match; Gimnasia away posts 1.14 xG, 9.4 shots (3.5 on target) and 0.9 goals per match with 47% possession. Defensively the visitors concede 1.1 goals on average away, but their average xG against is as high as 1.87 versus 1.07 for Racing, suggesting Gimnasia allows more clear-cut chances. In the last 5 matches Racing scored 10 goals (3 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss) and averages 2.0 points per match, while Gimnasia scored 7 goals with a 4W-1L record and 2.4 points per match; however, the visitors fail to score in 40% of away games versus 29% for hosts. Therefore I favor Racing to win, estimating their probability at ~55%, draw 25% and away win 20%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Season statistics show BTTS occurs for Racing in 50% of matches and for Gimnasia in 30%, yielding a simple average of 40% versus the league average of 45%. In the last 5 fixtures Racing had BTTS in 60% with an average 2.0 goals scored and 1.0 conceded, whereas Gimnasia has 0% BTTS in the last 5 with an average 1.4 scored and 0.4 conceded. Racing creates significantly more chances: 13.25 shots and 4.13 on target with xG 1.47, while Gimnasia averages 9.4 shots and 3.5 on target with xG 1.14, so the home side is the primary source of goals. However, Gimnasia fails to score in 40% of matches and keeps a clean sheet in 30% of games, and 69% of league matches end with at least one clean sheet, which reduces the likelihood of both teams scoring. Weighing season values (average 40%), the league 45% and recent form over the last 5 (approx. 30% average given Racing 60% and Gimnasia 0%), I assess BTTS probability at 38% for 'yes' and 62% for 'no', therefore I recommend a 'No' bet as more likely.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model projects 1.67 goals for Racing (average of xG_for 1.47 and opponent xG_against 1.87) and 1.28 for Gimnasia (average of xG_for 1.14 and home xG_against 1.42), totaling 2.95 goals. Seasonally Racing has 75% of home matches over 1.5 and 63% over 2.5, while Gimnasia records 60% over 1.5 and only 30% over 2.5, favoring the over. Racing averages 13.25 shots and 4.13 on target per match versus Gimnasia’s 9.4 and 3.5, and in the last 5 fixtures the hosts scored 10 goals (2.0 avg), which increases the likelihood of more goals. On the other hand, seasonal stats show a low probability of over 3.5 goals (over3.5: 25% for Racing, 10% for Gimnasia), so I rate over 3.5 at about 28%. In summary, the strongest signal is over 1.5 (approx. 80% chance), while over 2.5 has a moderate edge (~62%) and can be the secondary option.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Racing is favored to lead at the break and maintain the lead to full-time (HT/FT 1/1): in 4 of their last 5 matches they were leading at half-time (80%) and averaged 1.2 goals by the break versus Gimnasia’s 0.6. The home side’s xG is 1.47 compared to the visitors’ 1.14, and an average of 13.25 shots vs 9.4 confirms Racing’s offensive superiority, increasing the likelihood of a half-time lead and final victory. Seasonally the hosts have led at the break in 50% of matches and average 0.88 goals by half-time, while conceding 0.75 goals after the break, so there is a moderate risk of a turnaround from the opponents. Despite the guests’ good form (4 wins in their last 5, 80%), the xG balance and shot advantage favor the hosts holding their lead, making HT/FT 1/1 the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Racing Club | Gimnasia La Plata | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 27% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Gimnasia La Plata is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Racing Club · 2.4 pts / match - Gimnasia La Plata
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Gimnasia La Plata is 5% better for: goals scored per match.
1.06 goals / match - Racing Club · 1.11 goals / match - Gimnasia La Plata
Racing Club is 24% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.94 goals / match - Racing Club · 1.17 goals / match - Gimnasia La Plata
Racing Club scores in 72% of matches (13 of 18 matches), while Gimnasia La Plata keeps a clean sheet in 33% (6 of 18 matches).
Gimnasia La Plata scores in 67% of matches (12 of 18 matches), while Racing Club keeps a clean sheet in 39% (7 of 18 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Racing Club
Over / Under - Gimnasia La Plata
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Gimnasia La Plata is 32% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.39 pts / match - Racing Club · 1.83 pts / match - Gimnasia La Plata
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Racing Club - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Gimnasia La Plata - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 56% of matches and wins 50%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Racing Club
Gimnasia La Plata
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Racing Club | Liga | Gimnasia La Plata | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.00 | 2.08 | ▲ 2.28 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 45% | ▼ 39% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 39% | 34% | ▲ 44% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 39% | 34% | • 33% |
| Goal before half-time | • 61% | 61% | ▲ 94% |
| Goal after half-time | • 72% | 71% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Racing Club 1 - 0 - 1 Gimnasia La Plata. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Racing Club vs Gimnasia La Plata?
The Primera División match finished Racing Club 2:1 Gimnasia La Plata. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Racing Club and Gimnasia La Plata?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Racing Club won 1, Gimnasia La Plata won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Racing Club vs Gimnasia La Plata?
Racing Club score 1.06 goals per game on average and Gimnasia La Plata 1.11. The Primera División average is 2.08 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Racing Club's matches and 39% of Gimnasia La Plata's.
What form are Racing Club and Gimnasia La Plata in?
Over the last 5 games Racing Club have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Gimnasia La Plata 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Racing Club vs Gimnasia La Plata?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


