Racing Santander vs SD Huesca: match statistics
Racing Santander vs SD Huesca: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Racing Santander played SD Huesca in Segunda División (Spain). The match was played on 3 May 2026. Final score: 4:2.
Current form
Racing Santander: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. SD Huesca: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Racing Santander scores 2.03 and concedes 1.49 goals per match. SD Huesca scores 1.00 and concedes 1.49. League average: 2.63 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Racing Santander 70%, SD Huesca 57%. Over 2.5: Racing Santander 70%, SD Huesca 43%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
Racing Santander has higher xG: 1.56 vs 1.20. Racing Santander: 13.7 shots per match, SD Huesca: 10.8.
Match halves
Racing Santander: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 1.19. SD Huesca: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.62.
Goals by minute
Racing Santander: 76-90+ (17 goals). SD Huesca: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Segunda División: 2.63 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Racing Santander are clear favorites: the hosts have scored 75 goals this season versus SD Huesca’s 37 and average 2.39 goals per game at home. Chance quality favors the hosts — their home xG is 1.85 with 16.22 shots and 6.61 shots on target, while Huesca away posts 1.02 xG, 9.39 shots and only 2.56 shots on target. Defensively the visitors are worse off: Huesca concedes 1.89 goals away and has a -19 away goal difference, and fail to score in 39% of away matches; Racing concede 1.39 at home and have a +18 home goal difference. In short-term form Racing have scored 13 goals in the last 5 matches and average 2 points per game in that run (3 wins), while Huesca have 5 goals and 1 point per game with 1 win in five matches. Considering the edge in xG, shot accuracy and the low percentage of “no goals” for the hosts, I predict a Racing win ('1') with approximately 72% probability, draw 16% and away win 12%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistical analysis indicates a high probability of BTTS - Yes: Racing has a season BTTS rate of 63%, Huesca 50%, and in the last 5 matches both teams recorded BTTS in 80% of games. Defenses are prone to concessions — Racing concedes on average 1.11 goals per match, Huesca 1.89, which increases the likelihood of goals from both sides. Offenses generate tangible chances: xG Racing is 1.37 versus xG against Huesca 1.55, and xG Huesca is 1.02 versus xG against Racing 1.33, meaning both sides have around 1.0 xG per match. Additionally, Racing averages 3.68 shots on target, Huesca 2.56; in the last 5 games Racing averaged 2.6 goals, Huesca 1.0, and clean sheets occur in only 32% and 17% of cases respectively, which also favors BTTS. Considering the strong signal from the last 5 matches (80%) and season rates above the league level of 55%, I recommend BTTS "Yes" (78% vs 22%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams frequently clear the 1.5-goal threshold: Racing in 74% of matches, Huesca in 67%, average 70.5%. Calculated xG is 1.46 for the home side (xG_for_home 1.37 and xG_against_away 1.55) and 1.18 for the visitors (xG_for_away 1.02 and xG_against_home 1.33), totaling 2.64 xG — clearly above 1.5. Racing scored 13 goals in the last 5 matches (2.6 avg), Huesca 5 goals (1.0), and the latest xG is 1.74 vs 1.00, which further increases the likelihood of at least two goals. Average on-target shots 3.68 (Racing) vs 2.56 (Huesca) and percentages of games with both teams scoring 63% vs 50% indicate numerous goal-scoring opportunities. Given these figures the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (hence the selection of “over” at the 1.5 line with an estimated 82%); the 2.5 line is less decisive (56% over), while 3.5 clearly favors Under.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Racing Santander shows markedly better half-time form: in the last 5 matches the home side led at the break in 3 of 5 games (60%) and averaged 1.4 goals by half-time, while SD Huesca averaged 0.4 goals by half-time in those five matches. Seasonal and quality differentials support the home advantage — Racing has an xG of 1.37 and averages 1.16 goals per match with 3.68 shots on target, whereas Huesca has an xG of 1.02, 0.83 goals per match and 2.56 shots on target; the visitors concede 1.89 goals per match on average. Additionally, Racing collected 29 points in second halves (1.53 points per second half) versus Huesca’s 10 points (0.56), suggesting the hosts can hold or extend a lead after the break. Given these figures the most likely scenario is Racing leading at half-time and winning the match (HT/FT 1/1) — I assign it a 33% probability; alternatively a draw at half-time with a later home victory (HT/FT X/1 ~18%) and a half-time draw followed by a draw (HT/FT X/X ~12%) are possible, the latter supported by a historical 47% rate of half-time draws for the home side. Turnaround scenarios in favor of Huesca are unlikely, as the visitors have only an 11% win rate this season and average just 0.83 goals per match.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Racing Santander | SD Huesca | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Racing Santander is 100% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Racing Santander · 1 pts / match - SD Huesca
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Racing Santander is 103% better for: goals scored per match.
2.03 goals / match - Racing Santander · 1 goals / match - SD Huesca
Racing Santander scores in 89% of matches (33 of 37 matches), while SD Huesca keeps a clean sheet in 24% (9 of 37 matches).
SD Huesca scores in 76% of matches (28 of 37 matches), while Racing Santander keeps a clean sheet in 22% (8 of 37 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Racing Santander
Over / Under - SD Huesca
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Racing Santander is 54% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.59 pts / match - Racing Santander · 1.03 pts / match - SD Huesca
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Racing Santander - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
SD Huesca - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Racing Santander
SD Huesca
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Segunda División).
Teams vs league
| Racing Santander | Liga | SD Huesca | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.51 | 2.63 | ▼ 2.49 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 70% | 55% | ▲ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 70% | 50% | ▼ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 22% | 27% | ▼ 24% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 73% | 68% | ▼ 65% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 75% | ▲ 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Racing Santander 0 - 1 - 0 SD Huesca. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Racing Santander vs SD Huesca?
The Segunda División match finished Racing Santander 4:2 SD Huesca. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Racing Santander vs SD Huesca?
Racing Santander score 2.03 goals per game on average and SD Huesca 1.00. The Segunda División average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 70% of Racing Santander's matches and 57% of SD Huesca's.
What form are Racing Santander and SD Huesca in?
Over the last 5 games Racing Santander have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and SD Huesca 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Racing Santander vs SD Huesca?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


