Racing vs Al Hikma: match statistics
Racing presents catastrophic form, having lost all 11 matches of the season, including the last 5 in a row, conceding an average of 3.4 goals per match at home. The hosts have not won a single encounter this season, holding a 100% loss record in home matches and a goal difference of -14. Al Hikma, despite average away form (17% wins, 50% losses), demonstrates significantly better defensive stability, conceding an average of only 1.17 goals away and maintaining 50% clean sheets. The difference in quality between the teams is distinct—Racing scores an average of merely 0.6 goals at home with an xG of 0.71, while Al Hikma has a better conversion rate (13% vs 11%) and higher xG (0.85). Given the dramatic weakness of the hosts and the relative solidity of the visitors in defense, a victory for Al Hikma is the most likely scenario, although a draw also remains a viable option.
Racing vs Al Hikma: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Racing played Al Hikma in Lebanese Premier League (Lebanon). The match was played on 23 January 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Racing: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. Al Hikma: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Racing scores 0.36 and concedes 3.00 goals per match. Al Hikma scores 1.09 and concedes 1.27. League average: 2.32 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Racing 36%, Al Hikma 36%. Over 2.5: Racing 64%, Al Hikma 55%. League level: BTTS 32%, Over 2.5 42%.
xG, shots and style
Al Hikma has higher xG: 0.97 vs 0.68. Racing: 3.1 shots per match, Al Hikma: 6.4.
Match halves
Racing: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.27. Al Hikma: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.64.
Goals by minute
Racing: 76-90+ (2 goals). Al Hikma: 61-75 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Lebanese Premier League: 2.32 goals per match, BTTS 32%, Over 2.5 42%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Racing presents catastrophic form, having lost all 11 matches of the season, including the last 5 in a row, conceding an average of 3.4 goals per match at home. The hosts have not won a single encounter this season, holding a 100% loss record in home matches and a goal difference of -14. Al Hikma, despite average away form (17% wins, 50% losses), demonstrates significantly better defensive stability, conceding an average of only 1.17 goals away and maintaining 50% clean sheets. The difference in quality between the teams is distinct—Racing scores an average of merely 0.6 goals at home with an xG of 0.71, while Al Hikma has a better conversion rate (13% vs 11%) and higher xG (0.85). Given the dramatic weakness of the hosts and the relative solidity of the visitors in defense, a victory for Al Hikma is the most likely scenario, although a draw also remains a viable option.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Racing | Al Hikma | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 47% | 49% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.22 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Hikma is 203% better for: goals scored per match.
0.36 goals / match - Racing · 1.09 goals / match - Al Hikma
Al Hikma is 136% better for: goals conceded per match.
3 goals / match - Racing · 1.27 goals / match - Al Hikma
Racing scores in 36% of matches (4 of 11 matches), while Al Hikma keeps a clean sheet in 55% (6 of 11 matches).
Al Hikma scores in 73% of matches (8 of 11 matches), while Racing keeps a clean sheet in 9% (1 of 11 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Racing
Over / Under - Al Hikma
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Hikma is 506% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.18 pts / match - Racing · 1.09 pts / match - Al Hikma
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Racing - second-half results
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Al Hikma - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -8 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Racing
Al Hikma
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Lebanese Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Racing | Liga | Al Hikma | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.36 | 2.32 | • 2.36 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 36% | 32% | ▲ 36% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 64% | 42% | ▲ 55% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 9% | 41% | ▲ 55% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 82% | 56% | ▲ 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 82% | 77% | ▼ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Racing 0 - 0 - 1 Al Hikma. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Racing vs Al Hikma?
The Lebanese Premier League match finished Racing 0:2 Al Hikma. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Racing vs Al Hikma?
Racing score 0.36 goals per game on average and Al Hikma 1.09. The Lebanese Premier League average is 2.32 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 36% of Racing's matches and 36% of Al Hikma's.
What form are Racing and Al Hikma in?
Over the last 5 games Racing have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Al Hikma 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Racing vs Al Hikma?
The statistical background for Racing vs Al Hikma — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.