Uruguay - Primera DivisiónParque Osvaldo RobertoData current as of 15 October 2026

Racing vs Albion: match statistics

Racing crest
Racing
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Albion crest
Albion

Racing vs Albion: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Racing played Albion in Primera División (Uruguay). The match was played on 31 August 2026. Venue: Parque Osvaldo Roberto. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Racing: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Albion: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Racing scores 1.24 and concedes 0.76 goals per match. Albion scores 1.40 and concedes 1.20. League average: 2.35 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Racing 48%, Albion 60%. Over 2.5: Racing 28%, Albion 56%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

Racing has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.23. Racing: 12.8 shots per match, Albion: 9.6.

Match halves

Racing: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.60. Albion: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.68.

Goals by minute

Racing: 76-90+ (7 goals). Albion: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Primera División: 2.35 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Racing sit 3rd, while Albion are sixth, and the gap is primarily reflected in their current form: the hosts have collected 8 points from their last 5 matches, whereas the visitors have taken just 1 point after four consecutive defeats. At home, Racing win 54% of their matches and lose just 8%, averaging 1.38 goals scored and 0.69 conceded per game. Away from home, Albion average 1.00 goal, fail to score in 25% of matches, and create chances worth 1.17 xG, compared with Racing’s 1.58 xG at home. The hosts also register more shots—13.0 per match versus Albion’s 9.33—while their defence keeps a clean sheet in 54% of home fixtures. The last five matches further strengthen the case for Racing: they have conceded just 3 goals, while Albion have allowed 9.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest argument for BTTS - No is Racing’s current defensive form: in their last 5 matches, the team conceded just 3 goals, averaging 0.6 per game, while both teams scored in only 20% of those fixtures. Albion averages 1.0 goal both across the entire season and over the last 5 rounds, whereas Racing has allowed opponents just 1.00 xG during this period. The hosts should have good chances to score, as Albion conceded 9 goals in their last five matches and allows opponents an average xG of 1.41, compared with Racing’s recent xG of 1.48. Racing’s season BTTS rate is high at 69%, but the current defensive improvement and Albion’s poor run, having lost 4 of their last 5 matches, increase the likelihood of a clean sheet for the visitors and a No Goal outcome for Albion.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is on Under 3.5 goals, as Albion had as many as 92% of their matches finish with a maximum of three goals this season, while only 8% exceeded that line. Racing are more open, but even in their matches, Under 3.5 landed in 54% of cases, and the team conceded just 3 goals in their last five matches, averaging 0.6 per game. Albion score an average of 1.0 goal, while Racing have also scored only 1.0 goal per match in their last five appearances, limiting the risk of a very high-scoring game. At the same time, the hosts’ latest xG stands at 1.48 and the visitors’ at 1.24, making a match with around 2–3 goals the most likely outcome rather than four or more. Albion’s weaker recent defensive form, conceding 1.8 goals per game across their last five fixtures, increases Racing’s chances of scoring, but is not enough to undermine the advantage of Under 3.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Racing win at full-time, as both teams were level after 45 minutes in 60% of their last five matches. Albion failed to lead at the break in any of those five games, while Racing conceded an average of just 0.6 goals in first halves, compared with 1.0 for the visitors. Over the full season, Racing have scored 1.77 goals per home match, whereas Albion average 1.00 goals away from home, and their recent form shows 0 wins and as many as 80% defeats. The home side’s advantage should increase particularly after the break, as Albion conceded an average of 0.8 goals in second halves across their last five matches, while Racing conceded none. Racing’s superior shot-conversion rate, 18% compared with Albion’s 11%, further strengthens the hosts’ chances of turning a closely contested opening into a win.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
RacingAlbion
17Shots8
RacingAlbion
6Shots on target4
RacingAlbion
1.99xG1.27
RacingAlbion
6Corners3
RacingAlbion
71Dangerous attacks67
RacingAlbion
16Fouls7
RacingAlbion
2Cards3
RacingAlbion

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.24Goals scored / match1.4
RacingAlbion
0.76Goals conceded / match1.2
RacingAlbion
48%Average possession53%
RacingAlbion
3.96Shots on target / match4.12
RacingAlbion

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.8Shots per match9.56
RacingAlbion
3.96Shots on target4.12
RacingAlbion
9.7%Shot conversion14.6%
RacingAlbion
48%Possession53%
RacingAlbion
1.57xG for1.23
RacingAlbion
1.06xG against1.44
RacingAlbion

Shooting quality

Racing: BalancedAlbion: Efficient finishing
RacingAlbion
Accuracy (shots on target)31%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Racing is 700% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Racing · 0.2 pts / match - Albion

Racing
LWDWD
Season result split
48% W40% D12% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-10-3
1.84 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-5-1
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WDDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 0.99BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Albion
LDLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
36% W28% D36% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-7-9
1.36 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-4-3
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LWDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Albion is 13% better for: goals scored per match.

1.24 goals / match - Racing · 1.4 goals / match - Albion

Racing is 58% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.76 goals / match - Racing · 1.2 goals / match - Albion

Racing scoring profile: very strong

Racing scores in 80% of matches (20 of 25 matches), while Albion keeps a clean sheet in 24% (6 of 25 matches).

Albion scoring profile: strong

Albion scores in 76% of matches (19 of 25 matches), while Racing keeps a clean sheet in 44% (11 of 25 matches).

31Goals scored (season)35
RacingAlbion
19Goals conceded (season)30
RacingAlbion
2Average goals in match2.6
RacingAlbion
5Goals scored (last 5)5
RacingAlbion
3Goals conceded (last 5)9
RacingAlbion

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal76%
RacingAlbion
32%2 goals40%
RacingAlbion
8%3 goals12%
RacingAlbion
4%4 goals4%
RacingAlbion

How often they concede at least...

56%1 goal76%
RacingAlbion
12%2 goals36%
RacingAlbion
4%3 goals8%
RacingAlbion
4%4 goals0%
RacingAlbion

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time32%
RacingAlbion
4%BTTS in both halves8%
RacingAlbion
16%Scored in both halves16%
RacingAlbion

BTTS and goal count

24%Min. 3 goals and BTTS52%
RacingAlbion
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
RacingAlbion
20%BTTS - last 560%
RacingAlbion

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
RacingAlbion
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time48%
RacingAlbion
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
RacingAlbion

2nd half

56%Min. 1 goal after half-time68%
RacingAlbion
32%Min. 2 goals after half-time28%
RacingAlbion
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
RacingAlbion

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Racing is 29% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.6 pts / match - Racing · 1.24 pts / match - Albion

Racing - half-time state
36% leading52% draw12% trailing
Albion - half-time state
28% leading40% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.6Points per match (1st half)1.24
RacingAlbion
0.64Goals scored (1st half)0.72
RacingAlbion
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)0.72
RacingAlbion
1.04Average goals (1st half)1.44
RacingAlbion
68%Clean sheet before half-time44%
RacingAlbion
44%No goal before half-time44%
RacingAlbion

After half-time (2nd half)

1.36Points per match (2nd half)1.24
RacingAlbion
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)0.68
RacingAlbion
0.36Goals conceded (2nd half)0.48
RacingAlbion
0.96Average goals (2nd half)1.16
RacingAlbion
72%Clean sheet after half-time56%
RacingAlbion
60%No goal after half-time64%
RacingAlbion

Racing - second-half results

28% W52% D20% L
40
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Albion - second-half results

28% W40% D32% L
31
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding129%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Racing - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.40
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.0
Average goals in match1.20.4
1 goal60%20%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Albion - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.80
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Racing
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
6
3
16-30
6
4
31-45
2
1
46-60
6
3
61-75
7
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Albion
ScoredConceded
6
4
0-15
4
7
16-30
8
7
31-45
5
2
46-60
5
3
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.30
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+74%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Racing

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.51
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
73%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Albion

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.41
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
135%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
92%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).

Teams vs league

RacingLigaAlbion
Average goals in match▼ 2.002.35▲ 2.60
Both teams scored▼ 48%50%▲ 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 28%44%▲ 56%
Clean sheets▲ 44%29%▼ 24%
Goal before half-time▼ 64%66%▲ 80%
Goal after half-time▼ 56%72%▼ 68%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.35
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.31
Home goals / match
1.04
Away goals / match
+26%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AlbionYellow cardHernán Darío Toledo
  2. RacingSubstitutionOn: Matías UnyicioOff: Facundo Ezequiel González Muslera
  3. RacingSubstitutionOn: Franco Suárez RodríguezOff: Rodrigo Gadea

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Racing 1 - 0 - 0 Albion. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Racing vs Albion?

The Primera División match finished Racing 1:0 Albion. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Racing vs Albion?

Racing score 1.24 goals per game on average and Albion 1.40. The Primera División average is 2.35 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Racing's matches and 60% of Albion's.

What form are Racing and Albion in?

Over the last 5 games Racing have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Albion 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Racing vs Albion?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Racing vs Albion: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.