Uruguay - Primera DivisiónParque Osvaldo RobertoData current as of 30 October 2026

Racing vs Boston River: match statistics

Racing crest
Racing
3 : 2half-time 1:0
Boston River crest
Boston River

Racing vs Boston River: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Racing played Boston River in Primera División (Uruguay). The match was played on 12 September 2026. Venue: Parque Osvaldo Roberto. Final score: 3:2.

Current form

Racing: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Boston River: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Racing scores 1.19 and concedes 0.74 goals per match. Boston River scores 0.93 and concedes 1.30. League average: 2.34 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Racing 44%, Boston River 44%. Over 2.5: Racing 26%, Boston River 41%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

Racing has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.30. Racing: 13.2 shots per match, Boston River: 10.3.

Match halves

Racing: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.59. Boston River: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.59.

Goals by minute

Racing: 76-90+ (8 goals). Boston River: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Primera División: 2.34 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 4-1-0. Average goals 1.60, BTTS 20%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Racing sit 3rd, while Boston River are eighth, and the full-season record clearly favors the home side: 13 wins and just 4 defeats compared with the visitors’ 8 wins and 13 losses. At home, Racing win 57% of their matches, concede just 0.64 goals per game, and keep a clean sheet in 57% of fixtures. Boston River score only 0.86 goals per away match, fail to find the net in 43% of games, and lose 57% of their away fixtures. The hosts also create better chances, averaging 1.61 xG compared with Boston River’s 1.23, while their defense allows opponents just 1.08 xG versus 1.57 for the visitors. Both teams have scored 5 goals in their last five matches, but Racing have conceded only 2 during that period, further supporting the prediction of a controlled home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for BTTS - No is stronger, as Racing has recorded BTTS in only 38% of matches, with that figure dropping to 20% over the last 5 games. The hosts have been very solid without the ball recently, conceding just 2 goals in 5 appearances—an average of 0.4 per match—while keeping a clean sheet in 31% of their matches this season. Boston River scores an average of only 0.86 goals per match this season, and despite an xG of 1.23, their shot conversion rate is just 9%. The visitors have a weak defense, conceding an average of 1.71 goals, so Racing should have good chances of scoring; however, the more likely scenario is that at least one team—most notably Boston River—fails to score. Additionally, the teams’ combined seasonal BTTS rates of 38% and 50% do not exceed the league average of 49% in a way that supports a Goal/Goal scenario.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The profile of both teams clearly limits the risk of a very high-scoring game: fewer than 3.5 goals were scored in 85% of Racing’s matches and 86% of Boston River’s. In their last five appearances, Racing scored 5 goals and conceded just 2, while Boston River also scored 5 and conceded 4, resulting in an average of only 3.2 total goals per match across both runs. Moreover, just 20% of each team’s last five matches went Over 2.5 goals. Although Boston River concedes an average of 1.71 goals, Racing scores only 1.00 goal per game this season and keeps a clean sheet in 31% of matches. The estimated total of 2.06 goals therefore indicates that the strongest edge lies with Under 3.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Racing victory at full-time, as the hosts have been level at the break in 54% of their matches, compared with 64% for Boston River. Recent form further points to a cautious start: both teams ended the first half level in 80% of their last five matches, while Racing scored just 0.2 goals before the break during this period. After half-time, the advantage should shift to the hosts, who concede an average of 0.46 goals in the second half, compared with 1.14 for Boston River. Racing are also in better form in terms of results, averaging 2.0 points over their last five matches versus 1.6 for their opponents, while Boston River have lost 57% of their matches throughout the season. Racing’s advantage in shots on target, 4.77 to 3.36, together with the visitors’ significantly weaker defensive efficiency, conceding an average of 1.71 goals per match, further supports a post-half-time turnaround. The recommended HT/FT selection is X/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
RacingBoston River
13Shots9
RacingBoston River
6Shots on target5
RacingBoston River
1.59xG1.26
RacingBoston River
2Corners1
RacingBoston River
48Dangerous attacks46
RacingBoston River
-1Fouls-1
RacingBoston River
1Cards4
RacingBoston River

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

RacingBoston River
1.19Goals scored / match0.93
RacingBoston River
0.74Goals conceded / match1.3
RacingBoston River
49%Average possession51%
RacingBoston River
4.19Shots on target / match4.04
RacingBoston River

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.22Shots per match10.3
RacingBoston River
4.19Shots on target4.04
RacingBoston River
9%Shot conversion9%
RacingBoston River
49%Possession51%
RacingBoston River
1.62xG for1.3
RacingBoston River
1.07xG against1.58
RacingBoston River

Shooting quality

Racing: BalancedBoston River: Balanced
RacingBoston River
Accuracy (shots on target)32%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.23

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Racing
DWDWL
Season result split
48% W37% D15% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-10-4
1.81 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-5-1
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
DDWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.79Opponent xG: 1.08BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Boston River
WDWDL
Season result split
30% W22% D48% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-6-13
1.11 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-2-8
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LLWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Racing is 28% better for: goals scored per match.

1.19 goals / match - Racing · 0.93 goals / match - Boston River

Racing is 76% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.74 goals / match - Racing · 1.3 goals / match - Boston River

Racing scoring profile: very strong

Racing scores in 78% of matches (21 of 27 matches), while Boston River keeps a clean sheet in 19% (5 of 27 matches).

Boston River scoring profile: mixed

Boston River scores in 52% of matches (14 of 27 matches), while Racing keeps a clean sheet in 44% (12 of 27 matches).

32Goals scored (season)25
RacingBoston River
20Goals conceded (season)35
RacingBoston River
1.93Average goals in match2.22
RacingBoston River
5Goals scored (last 5)6
RacingBoston River
3Goals conceded (last 5)5
RacingBoston River

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal52%
RacingBoston River
30%2 goals22%
RacingBoston River
7%3 goals11%
RacingBoston River
4%4 goals7%
RacingBoston River

How often they concede at least...

56%1 goal81%
RacingBoston River
11%2 goals33%
RacingBoston River
4%3 goals11%
RacingBoston River
4%4 goals4%
RacingBoston River

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time19%
RacingBoston River
4%BTTS in both halves4%
RacingBoston River
15%Scored in both halves15%
RacingBoston River

BTTS and goal count

22%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
RacingBoston River
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
RacingBoston River
20%BTTS - last 560%
RacingBoston River

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time52%
RacingBoston River
22%Min. 2 goals before half-time22%
RacingBoston River
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
RacingBoston River

2nd half

56%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
RacingBoston River
30%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
RacingBoston River
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
RacingBoston River

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Racing is 46% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.52 pts / match - Racing · 1.04 pts / match - Boston River

Racing - half-time state
33% leading52% draw15% trailing
Boston River - half-time state
15% leading59% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.52Points per match (1st half)1.04
RacingBoston River
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.33
RacingBoston River
0.41Goals conceded (1st half)0.48
RacingBoston River
1Average goals (1st half)0.81
RacingBoston River
67%Clean sheet before half-time56%
RacingBoston River
48%No goal before half-time74%
RacingBoston River

After half-time (2nd half)

1.41Points per match (2nd half)1.07
RacingBoston River
0.59Goals scored (2nd half)0.59
RacingBoston River
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)0.81
RacingBoston River
0.93Average goals (2nd half)1.41
RacingBoston River
74%Clean sheet after half-time41%
RacingBoston River
59%No goal after half-time59%
RacingBoston River

Racing - second-half results

30% W52% D19% L
41
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.52
PPG before half-time
Lead holding145%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Boston River - second-half results

22% W41% D37% L
28
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.04
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Racing - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.80
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.0
Average goals in match1.00.6
1 goal40%40%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Boston River - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.20
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Racing
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
6
3
16-30
6
4
31-45
2
1
46-60
6
3
61-75
8
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Boston River
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
1
4
16-30
5
4
31-45
5
5
46-60
3
9
61-75
8
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.08
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
89%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-23%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
41%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Racing

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.55
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
71%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.21
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Boston River

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
100%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.49
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).

Teams vs league

RacingLigaBoston River
Average goals in match▼ 1.932.34▼ 2.22
Both teams scored▼ 44%49%▼ 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 26%44%▼ 41%
Clean sheets▲ 44%29%▼ 19%
Goal before half-time▼ 63%66%▼ 52%
Goal after half-time▼ 56%72%▼ 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.34
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.30
Home goals / match
1.04
Away goals / match
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Boston RiverYellow cardAgustín Ezequiel Aguirre
  2. Boston RiverYellow cardTeddy Lautaro Vázquez Rodríguez
  3. Boston RiverYellow cardLeandro Suhr Avondet
  4. Boston RiverSubstitutionOn: Yair GonzálezOff: Facundo Lemos
  5. RacingSubstitutionOn: Samuel GalloOff: Esteban Santiago Da Silva Álvarez
  6. Boston RiverYellow cardRodrigo Agustín Saravia Salvia
  7. RacingGoalTomás Habib

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Racing 4 - 1 - 0 Boston River. Average goals 1.60, both teams scored in 20% matches.

Racing
1 : 0
Boston River
Boston River
0 : 1
Racing
Racing Club de Montevideo
0 : 0
CA Boston River
Racing Club de Montevideo
2 : 0
CA Boston River
CA Boston River
1 : 3
Racing Club de Montevideo

FAQ

What was the result of Racing vs Boston River?

The Primera División match finished Racing 3:2 Boston River. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Racing and Boston River?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Racing won 4, Boston River won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 20% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Racing vs Boston River?

Racing score 1.19 goals per game on average and Boston River 0.93. The Primera División average is 2.34 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Racing's matches and 44% of Boston River's.

What form are Racing and Boston River in?

Over the last 5 games Racing have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Boston River 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Racing vs Boston River?

The statistical background for Racing vs Boston River — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.