Racing vs Boston River: match statistics
Racing vs Boston River: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Racing played Boston River in Primera División (Uruguay). The match was played on 12 September 2026. Venue: Parque Osvaldo Roberto. Final score: 3:2.
Current form
Racing: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Boston River: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Racing scores 1.19 and concedes 0.74 goals per match. Boston River scores 0.93 and concedes 1.30. League average: 2.34 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Racing 44%, Boston River 44%. Over 2.5: Racing 26%, Boston River 41%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots and style
Racing has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.30. Racing: 13.2 shots per match, Boston River: 10.3.
Match halves
Racing: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.59. Boston River: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.59.
Goals by minute
Racing: 76-90+ (8 goals). Boston River: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Primera División: 2.34 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 4-1-0. Average goals 1.60, BTTS 20%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Racing sit 3rd, while Boston River are eighth, and the full-season record clearly favors the home side: 13 wins and just 4 defeats compared with the visitors’ 8 wins and 13 losses. At home, Racing win 57% of their matches, concede just 0.64 goals per game, and keep a clean sheet in 57% of fixtures. Boston River score only 0.86 goals per away match, fail to find the net in 43% of games, and lose 57% of their away fixtures. The hosts also create better chances, averaging 1.61 xG compared with Boston River’s 1.23, while their defense allows opponents just 1.08 xG versus 1.57 for the visitors. Both teams have scored 5 goals in their last five matches, but Racing have conceded only 2 during that period, further supporting the prediction of a controlled home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The signal for BTTS - No is stronger, as Racing has recorded BTTS in only 38% of matches, with that figure dropping to 20% over the last 5 games. The hosts have been very solid without the ball recently, conceding just 2 goals in 5 appearances—an average of 0.4 per match—while keeping a clean sheet in 31% of their matches this season. Boston River scores an average of only 0.86 goals per match this season, and despite an xG of 1.23, their shot conversion rate is just 9%. The visitors have a weak defense, conceding an average of 1.71 goals, so Racing should have good chances of scoring; however, the more likely scenario is that at least one team—most notably Boston River—fails to score. Additionally, the teams’ combined seasonal BTTS rates of 38% and 50% do not exceed the league average of 49% in a way that supports a Goal/Goal scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The profile of both teams clearly limits the risk of a very high-scoring game: fewer than 3.5 goals were scored in 85% of Racing’s matches and 86% of Boston River’s. In their last five appearances, Racing scored 5 goals and conceded just 2, while Boston River also scored 5 and conceded 4, resulting in an average of only 3.2 total goals per match across both runs. Moreover, just 20% of each team’s last five matches went Over 2.5 goals. Although Boston River concedes an average of 1.71 goals, Racing scores only 1.00 goal per game this season and keeps a clean sheet in 31% of matches. The estimated total of 2.06 goals therefore indicates that the strongest edge lies with Under 3.5 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Racing victory at full-time, as the hosts have been level at the break in 54% of their matches, compared with 64% for Boston River. Recent form further points to a cautious start: both teams ended the first half level in 80% of their last five matches, while Racing scored just 0.2 goals before the break during this period. After half-time, the advantage should shift to the hosts, who concede an average of 0.46 goals in the second half, compared with 1.14 for Boston River. Racing are also in better form in terms of results, averaging 2.0 points over their last five matches versus 1.6 for their opponents, while Boston River have lost 57% of their matches throughout the season. Racing’s advantage in shots on target, 4.77 to 3.36, together with the visitors’ significantly weaker defensive efficiency, conceding an average of 1.71 goals per match, further supports a post-half-time turnaround. The recommended HT/FT selection is X/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Racing | Boston River | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Racing is 28% better for: goals scored per match.
1.19 goals / match - Racing · 0.93 goals / match - Boston River
Racing is 76% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.74 goals / match - Racing · 1.3 goals / match - Boston River
Racing scores in 78% of matches (21 of 27 matches), while Boston River keeps a clean sheet in 19% (5 of 27 matches).
Boston River scores in 52% of matches (14 of 27 matches), while Racing keeps a clean sheet in 44% (12 of 27 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Racing
Over / Under - Boston River
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Racing is 46% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.52 pts / match - Racing · 1.04 pts / match - Boston River
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Racing - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Boston River - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Racing
Boston River
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Racing | Liga | Boston River | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.93 | 2.34 | ▼ 2.22 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 44% | 49% | ▼ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 26% | 44% | ▼ 41% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 44% | 29% | ▼ 19% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 63% | 66% | ▼ 52% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 56% | 72% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): Racing 4 - 1 - 0 Boston River. Average goals 1.60, both teams scored in 20% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Racing vs Boston River?
The Primera División match finished Racing 3:2 Boston River. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Racing and Boston River?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Racing won 4, Boston River won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 20% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Racing vs Boston River?
Racing score 1.19 goals per game on average and Boston River 0.93. The Primera División average is 2.34 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Racing's matches and 44% of Boston River's.
What form are Racing and Boston River in?
Over the last 5 games Racing have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Boston River 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Racing vs Boston River?
The statistical background for Racing vs Boston River — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


