Racing vs Liverpool FC Montevideo: match statistics
Racing displays impressive home form with a 67% win rate and an average of 2.33 goals per match at home, which surpasses the offense of Liverpool FC Montevideo (1.33 goals away). The hosts have won 4 of their last 5 matches overall, scoring 9 goals, while the visitors have a more defensive approach with three draws in their last five matches. Racing boasts better xG statistics (1.96 vs 1.29) and a significantly higher average of shots on target in home matches (6 vs 3.33 for the visitors away). Liverpool FC Montevideo has not lost away this season, which increases the probability of a draw, however, Racing's offensive edge and home form give them a clear chance to win. The goal difference of both teams (Racing +3 at home, Liverpool +2 away) also speaks in favor of the hosts.
Racing vs Liverpool FC Montevideo: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Racing played Liverpool FC Montevideo in Primera División (Uruguay). The match was played on 21 March 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Racing: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Liverpool FC Montevideo: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Racing scores 2.00 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Liverpool FC Montevideo scores 1.17 and concedes 0.67. League average: 2.28 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Racing 50%, Liverpool FC Montevideo 50%. Over 2.5: Racing 50%, Liverpool FC Montevideo 33%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots and style
Racing has higher xG: 1.71 vs 1.33. Racing: 14.0 shots per match, Liverpool FC Montevideo: 11.2.
Match halves
Racing: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 1.33. Liverpool FC Montevideo: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.33.
Goals by minute
Racing: 61-75 (4 goals). Liverpool FC Montevideo: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Primera División: 2.28 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Racing displays impressive home form with a 67% win rate and an average of 2.33 goals per match at home, which surpasses the offense of Liverpool FC Montevideo (1.33 goals away). The hosts have won 4 of their last 5 matches overall, scoring 9 goals, while the visitors have a more defensive approach with three draws in their last five matches. Racing boasts better xG statistics (1.96 vs 1.29) and a significantly higher average of shots on target in home matches (6 vs 3.33 for the visitors away). Liverpool FC Montevideo has not lost away this season, which increases the probability of a draw, however, Racing's offensive edge and home form give them a clear chance to win. The goal difference of both teams (Racing +3 at home, Liverpool +2 away) also speaks in favor of the hosts.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Racing | Liverpool FC Montevideo | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Racing is 63% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / match - Racing · 1.6 pts / match - Liverpool FC Montevideo
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Racing is 71% better for: goals scored per match.
2 goals / match - Racing · 1.17 goals / match - Liverpool FC Montevideo
Liverpool FC Montevideo is 49% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - Racing · 0.67 goals / match - Liverpool FC Montevideo
Racing scores in 100% of matches (6 of 6 matches), while Liverpool FC Montevideo keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 matches).
Liverpool FC Montevideo scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while Racing keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Racing
Over / Under - Liverpool FC Montevideo
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Liverpool FC Montevideo is 71% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.17 pts / match - Racing · 2 pts / match - Liverpool FC Montevideo
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Racing - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Liverpool FC Montevideo - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +7 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Racing
Liverpool FC Montevideo
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Racing | Liga | Liverpool FC Montevideo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.00 | 2.28 | ▼ 1.83 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 46% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 44% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 31% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 64% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 74% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Racing 0 - 2 - 0 Liverpool FC Montevideo. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Racing vs Liverpool FC Montevideo?
The Primera División match finished Racing 1:0 Liverpool FC Montevideo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Racing and Liverpool FC Montevideo?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Racing won 0, Liverpool FC Montevideo won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Racing vs Liverpool FC Montevideo?
Racing score 2.00 goals per game on average and Liverpool FC Montevideo 1.17. The Primera División average is 2.28 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Racing's matches and 50% of Liverpool FC Montevideo's.
What form are Racing and Liverpool FC Montevideo in?
Over the last 5 games Racing have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Liverpool FC Montevideo 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Racing vs Liverpool FC Montevideo?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.