Uruguay - Primera DivisiónData current as of 22 July 2026

Racing vs Progreso: match statistics

Racing crest
Racing
1 : 1half-time 1:0
Progreso crest
Progreso
165%(1.85)
X22%(3.25)
213%(3.90)

Racing is in significantly better form, having won 4 of their last 5 matches overall, while Progreso has won only once in the same period. The hosts boast an impressive 75% win rate at home and a solid 75% clean sheets at their own ground, indicating a strong defense. Offensive stats also favor Racing – they average 2 goals per home match while conceding just 1, whereas Progreso in away matches concedes an average of 1.33 goals and scores only 1 per game. Furthermore, xG confirms the hosts' advantage (1.78 vs 0.98 for the visitors), and the possession difference (49% vs 44%) along with shots on target efficiency (5.25 vs 2.67 per match) further strengthens the case for a Racing victory. Considering all these factors, the hosts are clear favorites for this match.

Racing vs Progreso: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Racing play Progreso in Primera División (Uruguay). The match date is 26 March 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Racing: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match. Progreso: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Racing scores 1.30 and concedes 0.80 goals per match. Progreso scores 0.81 and concedes 1.52. League average: 2.41 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Racing 55%, Progreso 43%. Over 2.5: Racing 30%, Progreso 43%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

Racing has higher xG: 1.61 vs 1.16. Racing: 13.2 shots per match, Progreso: 8.5.

Match halves

Racing: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.65. Progreso: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.43.

Goals by minute

Racing: 61-75 (6 goals). Progreso: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Primera División: 2.41 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 2-1-0. Average goals 1.33, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Racing is in significantly better form, having won 4 of their last 5 matches overall, while Progreso has won only once in the same period. The hosts boast an impressive 75% win rate at home and a solid 75% clean sheets at their own ground, indicating a strong defense. Offensive stats also favor Racing – they average 2 goals per home match while conceding just 1, whereas Progreso in away matches concedes an average of 1.33 goals and scores only 1 per game. Furthermore, xG confirms the hosts' advantage (1.78 vs 0.98 for the visitors), and the possession difference (49% vs 44%) along with shots on target efficiency (5.25 vs 2.67 per match) further strengthens the case for a Racing victory. Considering all these factors, the hosts are clear favorites for this match.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
RacingProgreso
11Shots6
RacingProgreso
5Shots on target1
RacingProgreso
1.47xG0.71
RacingProgreso
4Corners2
RacingProgreso
58Dangerous attacks35
RacingProgreso
-1Fouls-1
RacingProgreso
4Cards7
RacingProgreso

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.3Goals scored / match0.81
RacingProgreso
0.8Goals conceded / match1.52
RacingProgreso
48%Average possession47%
RacingProgreso
4.2Shots on target / match3.24
RacingProgreso

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.15Shots per match8.48
RacingProgreso
4.2Shots on target3.24
RacingProgreso
9.9%Shot conversion9.6%
RacingProgreso
48%Possession47%
RacingProgreso
1.61xG for1.16
RacingProgreso
1.08xG against1.46
RacingProgreso

Shooting quality

Racing: BalancedProgreso: Balanced
RacingProgreso
Accuracy (shots on target)32%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Racing is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Racing · 1.2 pts / match - Progreso

Racing
WDDDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W40% R10% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-8-2
1.90 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-5-1
Last 5 at home
1-4-0
DDWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.64Opponent xG: 0.88BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%
Progreso
LWLLW
Season result split
19% W19% R62% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-13
0.76 pts / match · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-6
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.22Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Racing is 60% better for: goals scored per match.

1.3 goals / match - Racing · 0.81 goals / match - Progreso

Racing is 90% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.8 goals / match - Racing · 1.52 goals / match - Progreso

Racing scoring profile: very strong

Racing scores in 85% of matches (17 of 20 matches), while Progreso keeps a clean sheet in 10% (2 of 21 matches).

Progreso scoring profile: mixed

Progreso scores in 52% of matches (11 of 21 matches), while Racing keeps a clean sheet in 40% (8 of 20 matches).

26Goals scored (season)17
RacingProgreso
16Goals conceded (season)32
RacingProgreso
2.1Average goals in match2.33
RacingProgreso
3Goals scored (last 5)5
RacingProgreso
2Goals conceded (last 5)7
RacingProgreso

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal52%
RacingProgreso
30%2 goals24%
RacingProgreso
10%3 goals5%
RacingProgreso
5%4 goals0%
RacingProgreso

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal90%
RacingProgreso
10%2 goals52%
RacingProgreso
5%3 goals10%
RacingProgreso
5%4 goals0%
RacingProgreso

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time19%
RacingProgreso
5%BTTS in both halves10%
RacingProgreso
20%Scored in both halves19%
RacingProgreso

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
RacingProgreso
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
RacingProgreso
40%BTTS - last 560%
RacingProgreso

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time81%
RacingProgreso
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
RacingProgreso
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
RacingProgreso

2nd half

65%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
RacingProgreso
35%Min. 2 goals after half-time24%
RacingProgreso
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time5%
RacingProgreso

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Racing is 124% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.7 pts / match - Racing · 0.76 pts / match - Progreso

Racing - half-time state
40% leading50% draw10% trailing
Progreso - half-time state
14% leading33% draw52% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.7Points per match (1st half)0.76
RacingProgreso
0.65Goals scored (1st half)0.38
RacingProgreso
0.35Goals conceded (1st half)0.95
RacingProgreso
1Average goals (1st half)1.33
RacingProgreso
70%Clean sheet before half-time33%
RacingProgreso
40%No goal before half-time67%
RacingProgreso

After half-time (2nd half)

1.35Points per match (2nd half)1
RacingProgreso
0.65Goals scored (2nd half)0.43
RacingProgreso
0.45Goals conceded (2nd half)0.57
RacingProgreso
1.1Average goals (2nd half)1
RacingProgreso
65%Clean sheet after half-time48%
RacingProgreso
55%No goal after half-time62%
RacingProgreso

Racing - second-half results

30% W45% R25% P
34
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.70
PPG before half-time
Lead holding125%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Progreso - second-half results

19% W43% R38% P
16
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-12
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.76
PPG before half-time
Lead holding136%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 19%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Racing - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.80
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.00.4
Average goals in match0.40.6
1 goal40%40%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Progreso - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.40
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.4
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-3+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Racing
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
3
16-30
5
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
6
3
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Progreso
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
1
8
16-30
3
7
31-45
2
4
46-60
1
5
61-75
6
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.22
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
49%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-40%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
44%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Racing

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.53
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
98%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Progreso

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.41
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).

Teams vs league

RacingLigaProgreso
Average goals in match 2.102.41 2.33
Both teams scored 55%52% 43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 30%46% 43%
Clean sheets 40%27% 10%
Goal before half-time 65%69% 81%
Goal after half-time 65%73% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.41
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.33
Home goals / match
1.08
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Racing 2 - 1 - 0 Progreso. Average goals 1.33, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Racing Club de Montevideo
0 : 0
Club Atlético Progreso
Racing Club de Montevideo
3 : 0
Club Atlético Progreso
Club Atlético Progreso
0 : 1
Racing Club de Montevideo

FAQ

What was the result of Racing vs Progreso?

The Primera División match finished Racing 1:1 Progreso. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Racing and Progreso?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Racing won 2, Progreso won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Racing vs Progreso?

Racing score 1.30 goals per game on average and Progreso 0.81. The Primera División average is 2.41 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Racing's matches and 43% of Progreso's.

What form are Racing and Progreso in?

Over the last 5 games Racing have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Progreso 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Racing vs Progreso?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Racing vs Progreso: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.