Racing vs Safa: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Racing played Safa in Lebanese Premier League (Lebanon). The match was played on 2 December 2025. Final score: 1:6.

Current form

Racing: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Safa: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Racing scores 0.00 and concedes 2.83 goals per match. Safa scores 0.60 and concedes 0.60. League average: 2.18 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Racing 0%, Safa 20%. Over 2.5: Racing 50%, Safa 0%. League level: BTTS 21%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

Safa has higher xG: 0.72 vs 0.49. Racing: 2.0 shots per match, Safa: 2.8.

Match halves

Racing: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00. Safa: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.40.

Goals by minute

Racing: 0-15 (0 goals). Safa: 31-45+ (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Lebanese Premier League: 2.18 goals per match, BTTS 21%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

0 : 4
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
RacingSafa
-1Shots-1
RacingSafa
-1Shots on target-1
RacingSafa
0xG0
RacingSafa
3Corners11
RacingSafa
0Dangerous attacks0
RacingSafa
12Fouls11
RacingSafa
0Cards0
RacingSafa

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0Goals scored / match0.6
RacingSafa
2.83Goals conceded / match0.6
RacingSafa
34%Average possession39%
RacingSafa
1Shots on target / match1.6
RacingSafa

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

2Shots per match2.8
RacingSafa
1Shots on target1.6
RacingSafa
0%Shot conversion21.4%
RacingSafa
34%Possession39%
RacingSafa
0.49xG for0.72
RacingSafa
1.6xG against0.98
RacingSafa

Shooting quality

Racing: BalancedSafa: Counter-attacking
RacingSafa
Accuracy (shots on target)50%57%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.240.26
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.000.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Safa is 400% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - Racing · 1 pts / match - Safa

Racing
LLLDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W17% R83% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-5
0.17 pts / match · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 at home
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.0Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 0.53Opponent xG: 1.73BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 60%
Safa
DLDLW
Season result split
20% W40% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-2
Last 5 away
0-1-2
DLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 0.72Opponent xG: 0.98BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Safa is 372% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.83 goals / match - Racing · 0.6 goals / match - Safa

Racing scoring profile: more difficult

Racing scores in 0% of matches (0 of 6 matches), while Safa keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 matches).

Safa scoring profile: mixed

Safa scores in 40% of matches (2 of 5 matches), while Racing keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).

0Goals scored (season)3
RacingSafa
17Goals conceded (season)3
RacingSafa
2.83Average goals in match1.2
RacingSafa
0Goals scored (last 5)3
RacingSafa
15Goals conceded (last 5)3
RacingSafa

How often they score at least...

0%1 goal40%
RacingSafa
0%2 goals20%
RacingSafa
0%3 goals0%
RacingSafa
0%4 goals0%
RacingSafa

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal60%
RacingSafa
83%2 goals0%
RacingSafa
50%3 goals0%
RacingSafa
17%4 goals0%
RacingSafa

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
RacingSafa
0%BTTS in both halves0%
RacingSafa
0%Scored in both halves20%
RacingSafa

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
RacingSafa
50%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
RacingSafa
0%BTTS - last 520%
RacingSafa

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time20%
RacingSafa
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
RacingSafa
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
RacingSafa

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
RacingSafa
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time20%
RacingSafa
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
RacingSafa

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Safa is 324% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.33 pts / match - Racing · 1.4 pts / match - Safa

Racing - half-time state
0% leading33% draw67% trailing
Safa - half-time state
20% leading80% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.33Points per match (1st half)1.4
RacingSafa
0Goals scored (1st half)0.2
RacingSafa
1.17Goals conceded (1st half)0
RacingSafa
1.17Average goals (1st half)0.2
RacingSafa
33%Clean sheet before half-time100%
RacingSafa
100%No goal before half-time80%
RacingSafa

After half-time (2nd half)

0.17Points per match (2nd half)1
RacingSafa
0Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
RacingSafa
1.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.6
RacingSafa
1.67Average goals (2nd half)1
RacingSafa
17%Clean sheet after half-time40%
RacingSafa
100%No goal after half-time60%
RacingSafa

Racing - second-half results

0% W17% R83% P
2
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.33
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Safa - second-half results

20% W40% R40% P
7
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Racing - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.20
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match1.21.8
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference-6-9
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Safa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match0.21.0
1 goal20%80%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Racing
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
5
31-45
0
2
46-60
0
5
61-75
0
3
76-90

Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Safa
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.02
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.3 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
10%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
0%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
60%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 2 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Racing

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.72
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
0%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
262%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Safa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
56%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
54%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Lebanese Premier League).

Teams vs league

RacingLigaSafa
Average goals in match 2.832.18 1.20
Both teams scored 0%21% 20%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%39% 0%
Clean sheets 17%47% 40%
Goal before half-time 67%58% 20%
Goal after half-time 83%76% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.18
Average goals per match
21%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
47%
Clean sheets
1.11
Home goals / match
1.08
Away goals / match
+3%
Home attack advantage
+3%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

Maher Sabra⚽ 1
Mohammad Al Hayek⚽ 1 · A 2

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SafaAssistMohammad Al Hayek
  2. SafaGoalMaher SabraAssist: Mohammad Al Hayek
  3. SafaGoalMohammad Al Hayek

FAQ

What was the result of Racing vs Safa?

The Lebanese Premier League match finished Racing 1:6 Safa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Racing vs Safa?

Racing score 0.00 goals per game on average and Safa 0.60. The Lebanese Premier League average is 2.18 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Racing's matches and 20% of Safa's.

What form are Racing and Safa in?

Over the last 5 games Racing have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Safa 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Racing vs Safa?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.