Radnički Niš vs Železničar Pančevo: match statistics
Radnički Niš vs Železničar Pančevo: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Radnički Niš played Železničar Pančevo in SuperLiga (Serbia). The match was played on 20 December 2025. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Radnički Niš: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Železničar Pančevo: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Radnički Niš scores 1.11 and concedes 1.42 goals per match. Železničar Pančevo scores 1.32 and concedes 1.16. League average: 2.78 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Radnički Niš 53%, Železničar Pančevo 53%. Over 2.5: Radnički Niš 53%, Železničar Pančevo 42%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 48%.
xG, shots and style
xG is very similar for both teams. Radnički Niš: 13.2 shots per match, Železničar Pančevo: 12.3.
Match halves
Radnički Niš: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.47. Železničar Pančevo: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 0.58.
Goals by minute
Radnički Niš: 31-45+ (6 goals). Železničar Pančevo: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
SuperLiga: 2.78 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 48%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Radnički Niš | Železničar Pančevo | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Železničar Pančevo is 1100% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - Radnički Niš · 2.4 pts / match - Železničar Pančevo
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Železničar Pančevo is 19% better for: goals scored per match.
1.11 goals / match - Radnički Niš · 1.32 goals / match - Železničar Pančevo
Železničar Pančevo is 22% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.42 goals / match - Radnički Niš · 1.16 goals / match - Železničar Pančevo
Radnički Niš scores in 63% of matches (12 of 19 matches), while Železničar Pančevo keeps a clean sheet in 37% (7 of 19 matches).
Železničar Pančevo scores in 84% of matches (16 of 19 matches), while Radnički Niš keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Radnički Niš
Over / Under - Železničar Pančevo
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Železničar Pančevo is 29% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.26 pts / match - Radnički Niš · 1.63 pts / match - Železničar Pančevo
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Radnički Niš - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 21%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Železničar Pančevo - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 0% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Radnički Niš
Železničar Pančevo
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (SuperLiga).
Teams vs league
| Radnički Niš | Liga | Železničar Pančevo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.53 | 2.78 | ▼ 2.47 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 53% | 57% | ▼ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 53% | 48% | ▼ 42% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 16% | 25% | ▲ 37% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 68% | 72% | ▼ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 84% | 77% | ▼ 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Radnički Niš 0 - 0 - 1 Železničar Pančevo. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Radnički Niš vs Železničar Pančevo?
The SuperLiga match finished Radnički Niš 1:0 Železničar Pančevo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Radnički Niš vs Železničar Pančevo?
Radnički Niš score 1.11 goals per game on average and Železničar Pančevo 1.32. The SuperLiga average is 2.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Radnički Niš's matches and 53% of Železničar Pančevo's.
What form are Radnički Niš and Železničar Pančevo in?
Over the last 5 games Radnički Niš have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Železničar Pančevo 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Radnički Niš vs Železničar Pančevo?
The statistical background for Radnički Niš vs Železničar Pančevo — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.