Raja Casablanca vs CODM Meknès: match statistics
Raja Casablanca vs CODM Meknès: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Raja Casablanca played CODM Meknès in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match was played on 21 June 2026. Venue: Stade Mohamed V. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Raja Casablanca: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. CODM Meknès: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Raja Casablanca scores 1.24 and concedes 0.60 goals per match. CODM Meknès scores 0.68 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.15 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Raja Casablanca 28%, CODM Meknès 32%. Over 2.5: Raja Casablanca 16%, CODM Meknès 24%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 38%.
xG, shots and style
Raja Casablanca has higher xG: 1.38 vs 1.11. Raja Casablanca: 10.8 shots per match, CODM Meknès: 9.2.
Match halves
Raja Casablanca: half-time lead 48%, second-half goals 0.64. CODM Meknès: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.48.
Goals by minute
Raja Casablanca: 76-90+ (9 goals). CODM Meknès: 46-60 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Botola Pro: 2.15 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 38%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Raja Casablanca are clear favorites: at home they concede on average 0.38 goals per match and keep a clean sheet in 62% of games, while CODM Meknès concede on the road 1.33 goals on average and have only 25% clean sheets. The home attack averages 1.23 goals per home match with xG 1.56, 4.54 shots on target and a 10% conversion rate, whereas the visitors score only 0.42 goals away with xG 1.09, 2.08 shots on target and a 4% conversion. In the last 5 matches Raja scored 6 and conceded 7, averaging 1.4 points per match, while Meknès have 5 goals and 9 conceded with 0.8 points per match, indicating weaker form and resilience from the visitors. Additionally, the hosts control 62% possession at home versus 49% possession for Meknès away, and the percentage of matches in which the visitors fail to score is 67% (vs 31% for the hosts), which increases Raja’s chance of a comfortable win. Considering the defensive advantage (0.38 vs 1.33), higher xG (1.56 vs 1.09) and significantly better efficiency, I assess the probabilities as 70% for the hosts, 18% for a draw and 12% for the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Season-long statistics point to No BTTS: Raja has a clean sheet in 54% of matches, and CODM fail to score in 67% of their games. Season BTTS rates are only 31% for Raja and 33% for CODM, both well below the league average of 51%. Raja average 0.92 goals scored and concede 0.69 per match (31-15) with xG-for 1.13 and shot conversion 10%, while CODM average 0.42 goals and 1.33 conceded per match (17-25) with xG-for 1.09 and conversion 4%, indicating very low offensive efficiency from the visitors. The only caveat is the last 5 matches, where CODM had BTTS in 80%, and the recent 5-match form shows Raja conceding 1.4 goals and CODM 1.8, which raises short-term risk of both teams on the scoresheet. Based on this, the 'No' scenario looks stronger and I estimate its probability at 75% versus 25% for 'BTTS - Yes'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I expect around 2.30 goals in total: Raja ~1.25, CODM ~1.05. The basis is xG: home xG 1.13, away xG 1.09; comparing with xG against (1.32 for CODM, 1.39 for Raja) yields a baseline of ~1.23–1.24 per team, which I lower for CODM due to a low shot conversion rate of 4% and a seasonal goals average of 0.42. Seasonal percentages confirm a low risk of a high-scoring game — Over 2.5 only 23% for Raja and 25% for CODM, Over 3.5 just 8% for both teams, while Under 3.5 occurs in 92% of matches. Raja at home records 54% clean sheets and concedes on average 3.0 shots on target versus 2.08 for the visitors; in the last 5 matches Raja scored 6 and conceded 7, CODM scored 5 and conceded 9, so the scoring tempo is moderate relative to the league average of 2.15. Therefore I pick Under 3.5 as the strongest signal (≈80%), with Over 1.5 rated at ~67% and Over 2.5 at ~40%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
At half-time the most common state is a draw — Raja led at the break in 15% of matches, while a draw occurred in 62% of the hosts’ games (clean sheet at half-time 77%), so the HT is most likely to be level. In full time the hosts have a clear advantage: Raja win 54% of home matches versus CODM’s 8% as visitors, with average goals scored 0.92 versus 0.42. After the break Raja more frequently decide matches in their favor — they average 0.62 goals in the second half versus 0.33 for CODM, scored 4 goals in minutes 46–60 compared to 1 for the visitors, and have 1.54 points gained after the break versus 0.75 for CODM. Additionally Raja’s chances-to-goals conversion rate is 10% versus 4% for the visitors, therefore the most probable scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Raja Casablanca | CODM Meknès | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 28% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Raja Casablanca is 75% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Raja Casablanca · 0.8 pts / match - CODM Meknès
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Raja Casablanca is 82% better for: goals scored per match.
1.24 goals / match - Raja Casablanca · 0.68 goals / match - CODM Meknès
Raja Casablanca is 67% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.6 goals / match - Raja Casablanca · 1 goals / match - CODM Meknès
Raja Casablanca scores in 72% of matches (18 of 25 matches), while CODM Meknès keeps a clean sheet in 40% (10 of 25 matches).
CODM Meknès scores in 56% of matches (14 of 25 matches), while Raja Casablanca keeps a clean sheet in 56% (14 of 25 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Raja Casablanca
Over / Under - CODM Meknès
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Raja Casablanca is 92% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.92 pts / match - Raja Casablanca · 1 pts / match - CODM Meknès
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Raja Casablanca - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 48% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
CODM Meknès - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 0% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Raja Casablanca
CODM Meknès
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| Raja Casablanca | Liga | CODM Meknès | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.84 | 2.15 | ▼ 1.68 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 28% | 51% | ▼ 32% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 16% | 38% | ▼ 24% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 56% | 31% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 56% | 61% | ▼ 36% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 68% | 74% | ▼ 72% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- CODM MeknèsYellow cardSoufiane Tahar
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Raja Casablanca 0 - 0 - 1 CODM Meknès. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Raja Casablanca vs CODM Meknès?
The Botola Pro match finished Raja Casablanca 2:1 CODM Meknès. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Raja Casablanca vs CODM Meknès?
Raja Casablanca score 1.24 goals per game on average and CODM Meknès 0.68. The Botola Pro average is 2.15 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 28% of Raja Casablanca's matches and 32% of CODM Meknès's.
What form are Raja Casablanca and CODM Meknès in?
Over the last 5 games Raja Casablanca have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and CODM Meknès 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Raja Casablanca vs CODM Meknès?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


