Raja Casablanca vs UTS Rabat: match statistics
Raja Casablanca vs UTS Rabat: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Raja Casablanca played UTS Rabat in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match was played on 14 June 2026. Venue: Stade Mohamed V. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Raja Casablanca: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. UTS Rabat: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Raja Casablanca scores 1.13 and concedes 0.48 goals per match. UTS Rabat scores 1.00 and concedes 1.43. League average: 2.12 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Raja Casablanca 22%, UTS Rabat 65%. Over 2.5: Raja Casablanca 13%, UTS Rabat 30%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 37%.
xG, shots and style
Raja Casablanca has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.24. Raja Casablanca: 11.0 shots per match, UTS Rabat: 9.1.
Match halves
Raja Casablanca: half-time lead 52%, second-half goals 0.57. UTS Rabat: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.48.
Goals by minute
Raja Casablanca: 76-90+ (7 goals). UTS Rabat: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Botola Pro: 2.12 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 37%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win (1): Raja possess a phenomenal home defence — conceding just 0.33 goals per match on average and keeping a clean sheet in 67% of games, which significantly limits opponents’ opportunities. At home Raja averages xG 1.58, 12.83 shots and 4.58 on target, while UTS away posts xG 1.38, 10.18 shots and 4.27 on target with 45% possession (Raja 62%), so the hosts create more chances and control the match. In attacking efficiency both teams are similar: Raja scores 1.25 goals at home with a 10% conversion rate, and UTS records 1.09 goals away with an 11% conversion, therefore defensive advantage and possession will be decisive. Recent form is mixed — UTS has 1.4 points per game in the last 5 matches versus Raja’s 1.2, but the hosts win 58% of home games compared to UTS’s 27% away win rate. Considering the difference in average goals conceded (0.33 vs 1.36) along with Raja’s higher xG and match control, I estimate probabilities of 65% for Raja, 20% for a draw and 15% for a UTS win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS indicators show a clear propensity for both teams to score: Raja 67% and UTS 64%, both above the league average of 50%. Clean sheets are rare: only 8% of Raja’s matches and 9% of UTS’s matches end with that team keeping a clean sheet, meaning they concede in 91–92% of games. Chance metrics confirm offensive potential on both sides — xG 1.13 for Raja versus 1.38 for UTS, xG conceded around 1.46–1.47, and on average 3.17 shots on target for Raja and 4.27 for UTS — UTS creates more chances, but both teams pose opportunities. There is short-term risk: in the last 5 matches Raja has 0% BTTS, scored only 3 goals (0.6 per game) with xG 1.37, indicating finishing issues; UTS in the last 5 scored 6 and conceded 6 (1.2 per game) and had 40% BTTS. Considering the dominant seasonal signal 67%/64%, low clean sheets 8–9% and the generated xG, I assess BTTS probability at 70% (not 30%) and tip 'BTTS - Yes'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Expected goals estimate based on xG is 1.30 for Raja (xG attack 1.13 vs xG defense UTS 1.47) and 1.42 for UTS (xG attack 1.38 vs xG defense Raja 1.46), totaling 2.72 goals. With lambda = 2.72 the Poisson distribution yields ~75.5% probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), ~51% for at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) and ~29% for at least 4 goals (Over 3.5). Additionally, seasonal indicators support Over 1.5: Raja has 83% of home matches with >1.5, UTS 73% away, and both-teams-to-score occurrences are 67% and 64% respectively. Matches above 2.5 account for only 25% for Raja and 36% for UTS, and above 3.5 are 17% and 9%, making Over 2.5 and Over 3.5 less reliable. Therefore the strongest and best-justified signal is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Visitors look stronger over the full 90 minutes: UTS Rabat averages 1.18 points per match versus 0.58 for Raja and has a 27% win rate this season compared to 0% for the home side, favoring an away win. At half-time a draw is more likely – the hosts were level at the break in 67% of home games, and first-half goals average 1.0 for the home team and 1.45 for the visitors, indicating a moderate number of goals in the opening 45 minutes. UTS’s offensive edge is reflected in xG of 1.38 versus 1.13 for Raja and in average shots 10.18 vs 8.17, so the visitors have the tools to turn the game in the second half. In the last five matches UTS scored 9 first-half goals compared to 3 for the hosts, although the hosts keep a first-half clean sheet in 58% of home games, which increases the likelihood of a draw at the break. On this basis the strongest signal is a Half-Time draw and an away win after 90 minutes (X/2).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Raja Casablanca | UTS Rabat | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
UTS Rabat is 17% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Raja Casablanca · 1.4 pts / match - UTS Rabat
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Raja Casablanca is 13% better for: goals scored per match.
1.13 goals / match - Raja Casablanca · 1 goals / match - UTS Rabat
Raja Casablanca is 198% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.48 goals / match - Raja Casablanca · 1.43 goals / match - UTS Rabat
Raja Casablanca scores in 70% of matches (16 of 23 matches), while UTS Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 9% (2 of 23 matches).
UTS Rabat scores in 70% of matches (16 of 23 matches), while Raja Casablanca keeps a clean sheet in 61% (14 of 23 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Raja Casablanca
Over / Under - UTS Rabat
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Raja Casablanca is 92% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2 pts / match - Raja Casablanca · 1.04 pts / match - UTS Rabat
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Raja Casablanca - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 52% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
UTS Rabat - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 13%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Raja Casablanca
UTS Rabat
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| Raja Casablanca | Liga | UTS Rabat | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.61 | 2.12 | ▲ 2.43 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 22% | 50% | ▲ 65% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 13% | 37% | ▼ 30% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 61% | 31% | ▼ 9% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 61% | • 61% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 65% | 72% | ▲ 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Raja Casablanca 0 - 1 - 0 UTS Rabat. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Raja Casablanca vs UTS Rabat?
The Botola Pro match finished Raja Casablanca 1:1 UTS Rabat. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Raja Casablanca vs UTS Rabat?
Raja Casablanca score 1.13 goals per game on average and UTS Rabat 1.00. The Botola Pro average is 2.12 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 37% of games. Both teams score in 22% of Raja Casablanca's matches and 65% of UTS Rabat's.
What form are Raja Casablanca and UTS Rabat in?
Over the last 5 games Raja Casablanca have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and UTS Rabat 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Raja Casablanca vs UTS Rabat?
The statistical background for Raja Casablanca vs UTS Rabat — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


