Raja Casablanca vs Wydad Casablanca: match statistics
Raja Casablanca vs Wydad Casablanca: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Raja Casablanca played Wydad Casablanca in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match was played on 9 May 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Raja Casablanca: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Wydad Casablanca: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Raja Casablanca scores 1.32 and concedes 0.37 goals per match. Wydad Casablanca scores 1.53 and concedes 0.84. League average: 2.18 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Raja Casablanca 26%, Wydad Casablanca 47%. Over 2.5: Raja Casablanca 16%, Wydad Casablanca 42%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 38%.
xG, shots and style
Wydad Casablanca has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.38. Raja Casablanca: 10.7 shots per match, Wydad Casablanca: 11.7.
Match halves
Raja Casablanca: half-time lead 58%, second-half goals 0.68. Wydad Casablanca: half-time lead 53%, second-half goals 0.53.
Goals by minute
Raja Casablanca: 76-90+ (7 goals). Wydad Casablanca: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Botola Pro: 2.18 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 38%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win (1): Raja have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring 10 goals in that span (2.0 per match) and averaging 2.4 points per game. At home Raja win 70% of matches, concede only 0.2 goals per game on average and keep 80% clean sheets, whereas Wydad away concedes 1.0 goals per game on average and has only 20% clean sheets. Offensively Wydad have 29 goals this season versus Raja’s 25 and a higher shot conversion rate (15% vs 13%), but the visitors have scored only 3 goals in their last 5 matches and have recorded 1 win in that period. In terms of quality of chances, the home xG is 1.50 versus the away xG of 1.43 for Wydad on the road, while Raja’s opponents generate on average xG 0.77 against them compared to 1.30 against Wydad, underscoring Raja’s defensive advantage. Considering 70% home win rate, 80% clean sheets and Wydad’s poor form (0.8 points per game in the last 5), I assign probabilities: home 72%, draw 15%, away 13%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I assess BTTS - Yes at 35% and No at 65%, therefore I select 'No' as the strongest signal. Raja at home averages 1.33 goals scored and concedes only 0.67, keeping a clean sheet in 56% of matches; in their last 5 games they scored 10 and conceded 3 (2.0 and 0.6 respectively). Wydad seasonally scores 1.7 goals per game, but in the last 5 matches has managed only 3 goals (0.6 per game) and had BTTS in just 20% of those five fixtures, indicating offensive issues. xG shows similar chance generation (xG home 1.5 vs 1.43 for away), but xG against Raja is 1.29 while actual conceded is 0.67, meaning the hosts defend better than xG suggests and limit opponents' chances. Considering the league average BTTS of 49%, Raja's defensive edge (56% clean sheets) and Wydad's poor recent form (0.6 goals in last 5), the 'No' scenario is more likely (approx. 65% vs 35%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Estimates are based on xG and seasonal metrics: home xG 1.50 vs away defense xG 1.30, implying ~1.40 expected goals for Raja; away xG 1.43 vs home defense 1.29, implying ~1.36 expected goals for Wydad, total = 2.76. Raja scored 10 goals in the last 5 matches (2.0 avg) while Wydad has only 3 goals in the last 5 (0.6), which increases the probability of home goals. Seasonally both teams rarely finish goalless (over 0.5: 89% and 90%) and have over 1.5 in 67% (Raja) and 60% (Wydad) of matches, so I rate over 1.5 at ~76%. Over 2.5 is less certain (seasonal 33% vs 50% and last 5: 40% vs 20%), hence a moderate 52% for Over 2.5, while Over 3.5 remains least likely (~30%), so the best signal is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Raja has a clear advantage at the break: they led at half-time in 6 matches (67%), and in the last 5 fixtures they led at the break in 4 of 5 (80%), with an average of 1.00 goals scored by half-time and only 0.11 conceded. The home side creates more chances (on average 12.56 shots and 4.56 on target vs Wydad’s 11.0 and 4.5) and posts a slightly higher xG 1.50 versus 1.43, and 5 of Raja’s goals came between the 31st and 45th minute with 0 conceded in that interval, which increases the likelihood of a lead at the break. Wydad, however, is more dangerous after the break and late on (5 goals in 76–90' and a shot conversion of 15% vs the home side’s 11%), which raises the probability of an equalizer after half-time. Considering form (last 5: Raja 80% wins vs Wydad 20%) and the fact Raja keep a clean sheet at half-time in 89% of home matches, I prefer the 1/1 scenario (40%) as the strongest signal, with 1/X (15%) as a realistic risk of an equalizer and a low probability of a full comeback (1/2: 5%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Raja Casablanca | Wydad Casablanca | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Raja Casablanca is 200% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / match - Raja Casablanca · 0.8 pts / match - Wydad Casablanca
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Wydad Casablanca is 16% better for: goals scored per match.
1.32 goals / match - Raja Casablanca · 1.53 goals / match - Wydad Casablanca
Raja Casablanca is 127% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.37 goals / match - Raja Casablanca · 0.84 goals / match - Wydad Casablanca
Raja Casablanca scores in 79% of matches (15 of 19 matches), while Wydad Casablanca keeps a clean sheet in 37% (7 of 19 matches).
Wydad Casablanca scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while Raja Casablanca keeps a clean sheet in 68% (13 of 19 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Raja Casablanca
Over / Under - Wydad Casablanca
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Raja Casablanca is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.16 pts / match - Raja Casablanca · 1.95 pts / match - Wydad Casablanca
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Raja Casablanca - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 58% of matches and wins 58%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Wydad Casablanca - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 53% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Raja Casablanca
Wydad Casablanca
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| Raja Casablanca | Liga | Wydad Casablanca | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.68 | 2.18 | ▲ 2.37 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 26% | 50% | ▼ 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 16% | 38% | ▲ 42% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 68% | 31% | ▲ 37% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 58% | 61% | ▲ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 68% | 76% | ▼ 68% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Raja Casablanca 0 - 1 - 0 Wydad Casablanca. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Raja Casablanca vs Wydad Casablanca?
The Botola Pro match finished Raja Casablanca 0:1 Wydad Casablanca. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Raja Casablanca vs Wydad Casablanca?
Raja Casablanca score 1.32 goals per game on average and Wydad Casablanca 1.53. The Botola Pro average is 2.18 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 26% of Raja Casablanca's matches and 47% of Wydad Casablanca's.
What form are Raja Casablanca and Wydad Casablanca in?
Over the last 5 games Raja Casablanca have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Wydad Casablanca 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Raja Casablanca vs Wydad Casablanca?
The statistical background for Raja Casablanca vs Wydad Casablanca — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


