Rajasthan United vs Chanmari: match statistics
Rajasthan United vs Chanmari: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Rajasthan United played Chanmari in I-League (India). The match was played on 19 May 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
Rajasthan United: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Chanmari: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Rajasthan United scores 1.38 and concedes 1.69 goals per match. Chanmari scores 1.31 and concedes 1.69. League average: 3.03 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Rajasthan United 69%, Chanmari 62%. Over 2.5: Rajasthan United 54%, Chanmari 62%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Rajasthan United has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.42. Rajasthan United: 12.3 shots per match, Chanmari: 10.6.
Match halves
Rajasthan United: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.92. Chanmari: half-time lead 46%, second-half goals 0.62.
Goals by minute
Rajasthan United: 46-60 (9 goals). Chanmari: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
I-League: 3.03 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Rajasthan United have a clear seasonal advantage at home: in home matches they average 1.29 goals scored, 0.86 goals conceded per game, xG 1.81, an average of 15.57 shots of which 5 are on target, with 43% of home games ending in a clean sheet and a 57% win rate. Chanmari are weaker defensively away — conceding 2.29 goals per game on average, 0% clean sheets and a 71% share of losses on the road, with away xG 1.32 and an average of 9.71 shots per match. In the short term the visitors look slightly better: in the last 5 matches Chanmari scored 7 goals and average 1.2 points per game, whereas Rajasthan in their last 5 have 1 win, scored 7 goals but conceded 13 and average 0.6 points per game. Quality-of-chances analysis shows a home advantage — xG 1.81 vs 1.32 and a clear superiority in shots (15.57 vs 9.71) suggest Rajasthan create more and better opportunities, while Chanmari rely on higher conversion (15% vs 8%) on fewer attempts. Considering the seasonal stability of the home defence (0.86 goals conceded per game and +3 home goal difference) and the visitors’ defensive frailty away (2.29 goals conceded per game and -6 goal difference), I assign a higher probability to the home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The "BTTS - Yes" scenario appears more likely: seasonal BTTS rates are 50% for Rajasthan United and 71% for Chanmari, compared to a league average of 63%. Notably, Chanmari have recorded zero clean sheets (0%) and concede on average 2.29 goals per game, while Rajasthan have conceded 13 goals in their last 5 matches (2.6 per game), increasing the probability of goals from both sides. xG analysis shows Rajasthan with xG 1.52 vs xG against 1.42, and Chanmari with xG 1.32 vs xG against 1.54 — combined xG_for is ~2.84, indicating a realistic potential of around 2.8 goals in the match. Additionally, Chanmari have 86% of matches over 2.5 goals and 71% of games combining over 2.5 and BTTS, while Rajasthan have 80% BTTS in their last 5 matches (4/5). Based on these specific figures, I recommend a BTTS = Yes bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG: Rajasthan United’s attack has xG 1.52 and Chanmari’s defense xG against 1.54 — the average yields an expected 1.53 goals for the home side; conversely Chanmari’s attack xG is 1.32 and the home defense xG against 1.42, giving an expected 1.37 for the away team, total = 2.90. Seasonal rates show the home side have 83% of matches with over 1.5 goals, the away side 100%, which strongly supports Over 1.5, whereas at the 2.5 line homes have 33% and away 86% — signals are mixed for Over 2.5. In the last 5 matches homes have 80% Over 2.5, scored 7 and conceded 13 goals (2.6 conceded on average), away have 60% Over 2.5, scored 7 and conceded 9 (1.8 avg) — this increases the likelihood of a higher goal count. Attacking stats: hosts average 11.67 shots with 4.5 on target (conversion rate 10%), away 9.71 with 3.57 on target (conversion 15%), indicating more chances for the hosts with higher efficiency from the visitors. A Poisson model for the expected total of 2.90 gives roughly 79% probability for Over 1.5, about 55% for Over 2.5 and around 33% for Over 3.5; therefore the strongest signal is to play Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Rajasthan United hold a slight xG advantage (1.52 vs 1.32) and a better points return at home (1.5 pts/match vs Chanmari’s 0.86 pts/match), while the visitors concede an average of 2.29 goals per game. The hosts led at the break in 3 of 6 matches (50%) and score 0.67 goals on average in the first half while conceding just 0.33, whereas the visitors concede 1.86 goals on average after the break. Additionally, the home side average 4.5 shots on target versus the visitors’ 3.57 and collect 1.17 points on average after the interval compared to the visitors’ 0.71, which increases the likelihood of them maintaining a lead at the break. Although the hosts have a high share of home draws (50%), the visitors lose away in 71% of matches, so the strongest signal from the data points to the home team leading at half-time and winning the match (1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Rajasthan United | Chanmari | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Chanmari is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Rajasthan United · 1.2 pts / match - Chanmari
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Rajasthan United is 5% better for: goals scored per match.
1.38 goals / match - Rajasthan United · 1.31 goals / match - Chanmari
Rajasthan United scores in 92% of matches (12 of 13 matches), while Chanmari keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).
Chanmari scores in 69% of matches (9 of 13 matches), while Rajasthan United keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Rajasthan United
Over / Under - Chanmari
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chanmari is 69% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Rajasthan United · 1.69 pts / match - Chanmari
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Rajasthan United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Chanmari - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 46% of matches and wins 31%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.9 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Rajasthan United
Chanmari
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (I-League).
Teams vs league
| Rajasthan United | Liga | Chanmari | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.08 | 3.03 | • 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 69% | 63% | • 62% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 54% | 56% | ▲ 62% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 23% | 21% | ▼ 15% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 62% | 71% | ▼ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 92% | 89% | ▼ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Rajasthan United 1 - 0 - 0 Chanmari. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Rajasthan United vs Chanmari?
The I-League match finished Rajasthan United 2:2 Chanmari. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Rajasthan United vs Chanmari?
Rajasthan United score 1.38 goals per game on average and Chanmari 1.31. The I-League average is 3.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 69% of Rajasthan United's matches and 62% of Chanmari's.
What form are Rajasthan United and Chanmari in?
Over the last 5 games Rajasthan United have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Chanmari 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rajasthan United vs Chanmari?
The statistical background for Rajasthan United vs Chanmari — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


