Nigeria - NPFLIlorin Township StadiumData current as of 09 November 2026

Ranchers Bees vs Enyimba: match statistics

Ranchers Bees crest
Ranchers Bees
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Enyimba crest
Enyimba

Ranchers Bees vs Enyimba: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ranchers Bees played Enyimba in NPFL (Nigeria). The match was played on 8 November 2026. Venue: Ilorin Township Stadium. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Ranchers Bees: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Enyimba: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ranchers Bees scores 1.10 and concedes 1.40 goals per match. Enyimba scores 1.09 and concedes 1.36. League average: 2.34 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ranchers Bees 60%, Enyimba 36%. Over 2.5: Ranchers Bees 60%, Enyimba 36%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 40%.

xG, shots and style

Enyimba has higher xG: 1.81 vs 1.41. Ranchers Bees: 6.5 shots per match, Enyimba: 10.4.

Match halves

Ranchers Bees: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.60. Enyimba: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.55.

Goals by minute

Ranchers Bees: 31-45+ (3 goals). Enyimba: 61-75 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NPFL: 2.34 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 40%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Ranchers Bees have failed to win any of their last 5 matches, but remain unbeaten at home, having won 2 and drawn 2. Enyimba have earned more points over the last 5 rounds (7 compared with 3), but have lost 4 of their 5 away matches and are yet to win on the road. The hosts average 1.5 goals at home, while the visitors score 0.6 and concede 1.8 goals per away match. The difference in chance quality is reflected in Ranchers Bees' home xG of 2.25, compared with the 2.09 xG Enyimba concede away from home. Despite the hosts' recent dip in form, their home record and Enyimba's struggles on the road point to a Ranchers Bees win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest argument for BTTS - No is Enyimba’s attack: away from home, they average 0.6 goals and fail to score in 60% of matches. Ranchers Bees keep a clean sheet in 50% of their home matches, further increasing the likelihood that the visitors will not score. The hosts are more likely to find the net, averaging 1.5 goals at home, while Enyimba concede 1.8 goals away. Although Enyimba’s away xG is 1.51, indicating potential to create chances, their actual scoring record has been markedly weaker; the rates of matches in which both teams scored are only 33% for the hosts at home and 40% for the visitors away. Therefore, it is more likely that at least one team will fail to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Ranchers Bees average 1.5 goals at home, while Enyimba score just 0.6 goals away, limiting the potential for a high-scoring game. The hosts keep a clean sheet in 50% of their matches, while the visitors fail to score in 60% of theirs. Although the hosts’ xG is 2.04 and the visitors’ 1.51, their actual scoring output is lower: over their last five matches, the teams averaged 0.6 and 1.0 goals per game, respectively. Under 3.5 goals landed in 67% of Ranchers Bees’ matches and 80% of Enyimba’s, so with a projected total of 2.4 goals, Under 3.5 goals is the strongest pick.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Ranchers Bees led at the break in 4 of their 6 home matches, while Enyimba were trailing at half-time in 4 of their 5 away games. The hosts average 1.0 goals scored and 0.17 conceded before the break, whereas the visitors have failed to score in the first half away from home, conceding an average of 1.0 goal. The hosts also have a clear edge over the full 90 minutes: at home, they average 1.5 goals scored with an xG of 2.04, while Enyimba concede 1.8 goals away, with opponents recording an xG of 2.09. However, caution is warranted, as Ranchers Bees have not won any of their last 5 matches overall, while Enyimba have recorded 2 wins. Despite the visitors' better recent form, the significant contrast between both teams' home and away performances points to Ranchers Bees leading at the break and holding on to that lead until full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

66Possession (%)34
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
16Shots4
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
4Shots on target1
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
2.13xG0.79
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
4Corners2
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
116Dangerous attacks62
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
5Fouls1
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
0Cards0
Ranchers BeesEnyimba

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.1Goals scored / match1.09
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
1.4Goals conceded / match1.36
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
35%Average possession42%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
2.5Shots on target / match5
Ranchers BeesEnyimba

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.5Shots per match10.36
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
2.5Shots on target5
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
16.9%Shot conversion10.5%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
35%Possession42%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
1.41xG for1.81
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
1.4xG against1.5
Ranchers BeesEnyimba

Shooting quality

Ranchers Bees: Counter-attackingEnyimba: Balanced
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
Accuracy (shots on target)38%48%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.220.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.440.22

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Enyimba is 133% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Ranchers Bees · 1.4 pts / match - Enyimba

Ranchers Bees
DLDLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
20% W30% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-5
0.90 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-0
Last 5 at home
2-2-0
WWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.13BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Enyimba
WLDLW
Season result split
27% W18% D55% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-6
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-4
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.69Opponent xG: 1.39BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ranchers Bees scoring profile: strong

Ranchers Bees scores in 70% of matches (7 of 10 matches), while Enyimba keeps a clean sheet in 36% (4 of 11 matches).

Enyimba scoring profile: strong

Enyimba scores in 55% of matches (6 of 11 matches), while Ranchers Bees keeps a clean sheet in 30% (3 of 10 matches).

11Goals scored (season)12
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
14Goals conceded (season)15
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
2.5Average goals in match2.45
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
3Goals scored (last 5)5
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
6Goals conceded (last 5)5
Ranchers BeesEnyimba

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal55%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
20%2 goals36%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
10%3 goals9%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
10%4 goals9%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal64%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
40%2 goals45%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
30%3 goals18%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
0%4 goals9%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

48%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time0%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
10%Scored in both halves27%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
60%BTTS - last 520%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time82%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time18%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time55%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time36%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Enyimba is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Ranchers Bees · 1.27 pts / match - Enyimba

Ranchers Bees - half-time state
20% leading40% draw40% trailing
Enyimba - half-time state
36% leading18% draw45% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.27
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.55
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
0.6Goals conceded (1st half)0.55
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
1.1Average goals (1st half)1.09
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
60%Clean sheet before half-time55%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
60%No goal before half-time64%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba

After half-time (2nd half)

1.1Points per match (2nd half)0.91
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)0.55
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
0.8Goals conceded (2nd half)0.82
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
1.4Average goals (2nd half)1.36
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
40%Clean sheet after half-time55%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
60%No goal after half-time55%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba

Ranchers Bees - second-half results

30% W20% D50% L
10
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Enyimba - second-half results

9% W64% D27% L
14
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding75%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 27%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ranchers Bees - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.00.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Enyimba - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal80%40%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ranchers Bees
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
0
2
16-30
3
2
31-45
2
1
46-60
1
2
61-75
3
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Enyimba
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
2
2
16-30
2
2
31-45
2
2
46-60
4
2
61-75
0
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.48
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
39%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
14%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ranchers Bees

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
184%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Enyimba

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.58
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.72
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
143%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).

Teams vs league

Ranchers BeesLigaEnyimba
Average goals in match▲ 2.502.34▲ 2.45
Both teams scored▲ 60%48%▼ 36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 60%40%▼ 36%
Clean sheets▼ 30%32%▲ 36%
Goal before half-time▼ 60%69%▲ 82%
Goal after half-time▲ 80%69%▼ 55%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.34
Average goals per match
48%
Both teams scored
40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.58
Home goals / match
0.76
Away goals / match
+108%
Home attack advantage
+52%
Home defence advantage
+46%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Ranchers BeesGoalChiedozie Okorie

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Ranchers Bees vs Enyimba?

The NPFL match finished Ranchers Bees 1:0 Enyimba. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Ranchers Bees vs Enyimba?

Ranchers Bees score 1.10 goals per game on average and Enyimba 1.09. The NPFL average is 2.34 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Ranchers Bees's matches and 36% of Enyimba's.

What form are Ranchers Bees and Enyimba in?

Over the last 5 games Ranchers Bees have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Enyimba 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ranchers Bees vs Enyimba?

The statistical background for Ranchers Bees vs Enyimba — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.