Nigeria - NPFLSani Abacha StadiumData current as of 15 October 2026

Ranchers Bees vs Niger Tornadoes: match statistics

Ranchers Bees vs Niger Tornadoes: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ranchers Bees played Niger Tornadoes in NPFL (Nigeria). The match was played on 11 October 2026. Venue: Sani Abacha Stadium. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Ranchers Bees: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Niger Tornadoes: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ranchers Bees scores 1.29 and concedes 1.43 goals per match. Niger Tornadoes scores 0.86 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.41 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ranchers Bees 57%, Niger Tornadoes 43%. Over 2.5: Ranchers Bees 71%, Niger Tornadoes 29%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 41%.

xG, shots and style

Niger Tornadoes has higher xG: 2.11 vs 1.13. Ranchers Bees: 3.9 shots per match, Niger Tornadoes: 10.1.

Match halves

Ranchers Bees: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.71. Niger Tornadoes: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.71.

Goals by minute

Ranchers Bees: 76-90+ (3 goals). Niger Tornadoes: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NPFL: 2.41 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 41%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Ranchers Bees have lost 3 of their last 5 matches, but have won 2 of their 3 home games and remain unbeaten at home; Niger Tornadoes have lost all 3 of their away matches so far. The hosts average 2 goals per game at home, while the visitors concede 1.67 goals and score just 0.67 on the road. The gap in chance quality is just as clear: Ranchers Bees' home xG stands at 1.75, compared with Niger Tornadoes' away xG of 0.87, and the hosts average 6 shots on target to their opponents' 2. In addition, Ranchers Bees concede just 0.33 goals per home game and have kept a clean sheet in 67% of those matches, while the visitors have failed to score in 67% of their away games. Despite the hosts' recent dip in overall form, their home record and their opponents' away struggles point to a Ranchers Bees win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest argument for BTTS - No is the visitors’ lack of goals: they failed to score in 67% of their matches and averaged just 0.4 goals across their last 5 games. Away from home, they average 0.67 goals from an xG of 0.87 and manage only 2 shots on target per match, while the hosts keep a clean sheet in 50% of their home games. Ranchers Bees have considerably greater attacking potential at home, with an xG of 2.52 and 6.75 shots on target per match, suggesting they could score despite averaging a lower 1.0 goals. A counterpoint is that the hosts have conceded an average of 1.6 goals over their last 5 games; however, BTTS - Yes landed in only 20% of Niger Tornadoes’ matches during that period. A home goal without a reply from the visitors is therefore more likely than both teams scoring.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Under 3.5 goals: Ranchers Bees have stayed below this line in every match included in the season statistics, while Niger Tornadoes have done so in 67% of their matches. The hosts create plenty of chances, with an average xG of 2.52, but score just 1.0 goal per game on average; the visitors average 0.67 goals and have failed to score in 67% of their matches. In their last five games, Niger Tornadoes scored just 2 goals in total, and none of those matches featured more than 2 goals. The hosts’ attacking potential makes the 2.5-goal line less reliable, but a projected total of around 2.20 goals gives Under 3.5 a clearer edge.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal is Ranchers Bees’ home advantage: they average 2.0 points per match, while Niger Tornadoes have yet to earn a point away from home and have lost all three of their matches. The hosts have an xG of 2.52 compared with 0.87 for the visitors, and average 17.25 shots per match, comfortably more than their opponents’ 4.0. Niger Tornadoes have been trailing at the break in all three away matches, conceding an average of 1.33 goals before half-time and scoring none, making a home lead at the break the most likely first-half outcome. Ranchers Bees average 1.0 goal scored and 0.5 conceded at home, while the visitors score 0.67 and concede 1.67 goals away, supporting the hosts’ chances of maintaining their lead until the final whistle. A half-time draw remains a significant alternative, as the hosts were level at the break in two of their four home matches; however, the overall data most strongly point to an HT/FT 1/1 outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

64Possession (%)36
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
19Shots4
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
7Shots on target0
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
2.74xG0.69
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
9Corners4
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
145Dangerous attacks57
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
9Fouls23
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
0Cards0
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
1.29Goals scored / match0.86
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
1.43Goals conceded / match1
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
26%Average possession41%
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
1.29Shots on target / match3.86
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

3.86Shots per match10.14
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
1.29Shots on target3.86
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
33.3%Shot conversion8.5%
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
26%Possession41%
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
1.13xG for2.11
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
1.59xG against1.1
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes

Shooting quality

Ranchers Bees: Counter-attackingNiger Tornadoes: Balanced
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
Accuracy (shots on target)33%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.290.21
Finishing (goals per shot on target)1.000.22

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Niger Tornadoes is 25% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Ranchers Bees · 1 pts / match - Niger Tornadoes

Ranchers Bees
LWLDL
Season result split
29% W14% D57% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-4
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-0
Last 5 at home
2-1-0
WWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Niger Tornadoes
DLDLW
Season result split
29% W29% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-3
1.14 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-3
Last 5 away
0-0-3
LLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.98Opponent xG: 1.11BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ranchers Bees is 50% better for: goals scored per match.

1.29 goals / match - Ranchers Bees · 0.86 goals / match - Niger Tornadoes

Niger Tornadoes is 43% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.43 goals / match - Ranchers Bees · 1 goals / match - Niger Tornadoes

Ranchers Bees scoring profile: strong

Ranchers Bees scores in 71% of matches (5 of 7 matches), while Niger Tornadoes keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 matches).

Niger Tornadoes scoring profile: strong

Niger Tornadoes scores in 57% of matches (4 of 7 matches), while Ranchers Bees keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 matches).

9Goals scored (season)6
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
10Goals conceded (season)7
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
2.71Average goals in match1.86
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
4Goals scored (last 5)2
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
7Goals conceded (last 5)3
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal57%
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
29%2 goals29%
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
14%3 goals0%
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
14%4 goals0%
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal71%
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
43%2 goals14%
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
29%3 goals14%
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
0%4 goals0%
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

46%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time0%
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
14%Scored in both halves14%
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes

BTTS and goal count

57%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
60%BTTS - last 520%
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time14%
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time57%
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ranchers Bees is 82% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.29 pts / match - Ranchers Bees · 0.71 pts / match - Niger Tornadoes

Ranchers Bees - half-time state
29% leading43% draw29% trailing
Niger Tornadoes - half-time state
14% leading29% draw57% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.29Points per match (1st half)0.71
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
0.57Goals scored (1st half)0.14
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
0.43Goals conceded (1st half)0.71
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
1Average goals (1st half)0.86
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
71%Clean sheet before half-time43%
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
57%No goal before half-time86%
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.86
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)0.71
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.29
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
1.71Average goals (2nd half)1
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
29%Clean sheet after half-time71%
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes
57%No goal after half-time43%
Ranchers BeesNiger Tornadoes

Ranchers Bees - second-half results

29% W14% D57% L
9
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Niger Tornadoes - second-half results

43% W57% D0% L
5
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding207%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ranchers Bees - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.21.2
Average goals in match0.41.8
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Niger Tornadoes - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.80
Goals scored / match0.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.0
Average goals in match0.60.4
1 goal60%40%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%100%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-3+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ranchers Bees
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
0
2
16-30
2
1
31-45
2
1
46-60
0
1
61-75
3
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Niger Tornadoes
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
2
16-30
1
3
31-45
0
1
46-60
1
1
61-75
4
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.29
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
40%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ranchers Bees

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.46
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
77%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
193%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Niger Tornadoes

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
116%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
60%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
67% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
67%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).

Teams vs league

Ranchers BeesLigaNiger Tornadoes
Average goals in match▲ 2.712.41▼ 1.86
Both teams scored▲ 57%46%▼ 43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 71%41%▼ 29%
Clean sheets▼ 29%34%▼ 29%
Goal before half-time▼ 57%70%• 71%
Goal after half-time▲ 86%70%▼ 57%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.41
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
1.67
Home goals / match
0.74
Away goals / match
+126%
Home attack advantage
+56%
Home defence advantage
+51%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Ranchers Bees vs Niger Tornadoes?

The NPFL match finished Ranchers Bees 0:0 Niger Tornadoes. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Ranchers Bees vs Niger Tornadoes?

Ranchers Bees score 1.29 goals per game on average and Niger Tornadoes 0.86. The NPFL average is 2.41 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Ranchers Bees's matches and 43% of Niger Tornadoes's.

What form are Ranchers Bees and Niger Tornadoes in?

Over the last 5 games Ranchers Bees have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Niger Tornadoes 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ranchers Bees vs Niger Tornadoes?

The statistical background for Ranchers Bees vs Niger Tornadoes — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.