Denmark - SuperligaCepheus Park RandersData current as of 16 October 2026

Randers vs Viborg: match statistics

Randers crest
Randers
0 : 2half-time 0:1
Viborg crest
Viborg

Randers vs Viborg: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Randers played Viborg in Superliga (Denmark). The match was played on 11 October 2026. Venue: Cepheus Park Randers. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Randers: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Viborg: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Randers scores 1.22 and concedes 1.56 goals per match. Viborg scores 1.67 and concedes 0.89. League average: 2.91 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Randers 44%, Viborg 44%. Over 2.5: Randers 56%, Viborg 44%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Viborg has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.20. Randers: 9.9 shots per match, Viborg: 13.6.

Match halves

Randers: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.56. Viborg: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

Randers: 0-15 (3 goals). Viborg: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Superliga: 2.91 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Viborg sit 3rd with a goal difference of 15:8, while eighth-placed Randers have scored 11 goals and conceded 14. The visitors create better chances away from home: their average xG is 1.47, compared with Randers’ 1.12 at home, and they average 4.25 shots on target versus 2.4. However, Randers have won 3 of their last 5 matches and scored 11 goals in that run, so they could take advantage of the fact that Viborg have conceded 8 goals over the same period. The visitors’ away record also points towards a draw: they have drawn half of those matches and failed to score in half of them, despite creating higher-quality chances.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

In the last 5 matches, both teams scored in 80% of games, while Randers and Viborg each conceded an average of 1.6 goals during this period. The case for BTTS - Yes is also supported by similar season-wide xG averages: 1.48 for the hosts and 1.47 for the visitors, indicating that both sides regularly create chances. However, caution is warranted: both teams scored in 40% of Randers' home matches, while Viborg failed to score in 50% of their away games. Randers' greater attacking output at home, where they average 2.2 goals compared with Viborg's 1.0 away goals, makes a home goal more likely; the visitors' recent scoring form—1.8 goals per match—tips the forecast slightly towards BTTS - Yes. BTTS - No means at least one team fails to score; it does not automatically mean a 0-0 draw or that neither team scores.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Randers average 2.2 goals scored at home, while Viborg concede 1.0 on the road, giving the hosts a solid foundation to find the net. Both teams generate similar xG — 1.48 and 1.47, respectively — so the visitors also have the potential to increase the total. Randers have averaged 3.8 total goals across their last five matches, compared with 3.4 for Viborg; at least two goals have also been scored in 80% of Randers' home matches and 50% of Viborg's away matches. Over 1.5 goals is the strongest pick, as it requires only two goals, while the higher Over 2.5 line has been hit in 60% of Randers' home matches but only 25% of Viborg's away matches.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Randers were level at half-time in 40% of their home matches, while Viborg were level in 50% of their away matches; the visitors failed to score in the first half in 75% of those games. After the break, the hosts have a clearer edge: they won 80% of second halves, while Viborg lost 50% of theirs. Randers scored an average of 0.8 goals and conceded 0.2 in the second half, increasing the likelihood of a turnaround from a draw. Although the teams’ attacking xG is almost identical—1.48 versus 1.47—Randers won 80% of their home matches, compared with Viborg’s 25% away-win rate. Therefore, a draw at half-time followed by a home win appears the most likely scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
RandersViborg
16Shots21
RandersViborg
4Shots on target4
RandersViborg
1.66xG2
RandersViborg
4Corners7
RandersViborg
51Dangerous attacks56
RandersViborg
10Fouls11
RandersViborg
3Cards1
RandersViborg

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.22Goals scored / match1.67
RandersViborg
1.56Goals conceded / match0.89
RandersViborg
44%Average possession48%
RandersViborg
3.33Shots on target / match4.11
RandersViborg

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.89Shots per match13.56
RandersViborg
3.33Shots on target4.11
RandersViborg
12.4%Shot conversion12.3%
RandersViborg
44%Possession48%
RandersViborg
1.2xG for1.48
RandersViborg
1.9xG against1.46
RandersViborg

Shooting quality

Randers: Counter-attackingViborg: Balanced
RandersViborg
Accuracy (shots on target)34%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.41

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Viborg is 67% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Randers · 2 pts / match - Viborg

Randers
LWWLL
Season result split
33% W11% D56% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-5
1.11 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DWLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.88BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Viborg
WWLDW
Season result split
56% W22% D22% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-2
1.89 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-1
Last 5 away
1-2-1
LDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 1.13BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Viborg is 37% better for: goals scored per match.

1.22 goals / match - Randers · 1.67 goals / match - Viborg

Viborg is 75% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.56 goals / match - Randers · 0.89 goals / match - Viborg

Randers scoring profile: strong

Randers scores in 67% of matches (6 of 9 matches), while Viborg keeps a clean sheet in 33% (3 of 9 matches).

Viborg scoring profile: very strong

Viborg scores in 67% of matches (6 of 9 matches), while Randers keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 matches).

11Goals scored (season)15
RandersViborg
14Goals conceded (season)8
RandersViborg
2.78Average goals in match2.56
RandersViborg
8Goals scored (last 5)12
RandersViborg
8Goals conceded (last 5)6
RandersViborg

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal67%
RandersViborg
44%2 goals44%
RandersViborg
11%3 goals33%
RandersViborg
0%4 goals22%
RandersViborg

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal67%
RandersViborg
33%2 goals22%
RandersViborg
22%3 goals0%
RandersViborg
22%4 goals0%
RandersViborg

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time22%
RandersViborg
11%BTTS in both halves0%
RandersViborg
33%Scored in both halves44%
RandersViborg

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
RandersViborg
22%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
RandersViborg
60%BTTS - last 560%
RandersViborg

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

89%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
RandersViborg
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time44%
RandersViborg
22%Min. 3 goals before half-time22%
RandersViborg

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time89%
RandersViborg
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time11%
RandersViborg
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
RandersViborg

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Viborg is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.22 pts / match - Randers · 1.44 pts / match - Viborg

Randers - half-time state
33% leading22% draw44% trailing
Viborg - half-time state
33% leading44% draw22% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.22Points per match (1st half)1.44
RandersViborg
0.67Goals scored (1st half)1
RandersViborg
0.89Goals conceded (1st half)0.44
RandersViborg
1.56Average goals (1st half)1.44
RandersViborg
44%Clean sheet before half-time56%
RandersViborg
44%No goal before half-time56%
RandersViborg

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.78
RandersViborg
0.56Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
RandersViborg
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.44
RandersViborg
1.22Average goals (2nd half)1.11
RandersViborg
44%Clean sheet after half-time67%
RandersViborg
56%No goal after half-time33%
RandersViborg

Randers - second-half results

22% W33% D44% L
11
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.22
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Viborg - second-half results

56% W11% D33% L
13
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.44
PPG before half-time
Lead holding170%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Randers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.61.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Viborg - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.80
Goals scored / match1.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match2.21.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+5+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 8

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Randers
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
2
3
16-30
1
3
31-45
2
1
46-60
3
1
61-75
0
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Viborg
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
2
1
16-30
4
2
31-45
4
1
46-60
1
2
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.67
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+50%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Randers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.70
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.34
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.09
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 27% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Viborg

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.76
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.57
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
118%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
60%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
7% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
7%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Superliga).

Teams vs league

RandersLigaViborg
Average goals in match▼ 2.782.91▼ 2.56
Both teams scored▼ 44%58%▼ 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 56%53%▼ 44%
Clean sheets• 22%23%▲ 33%
Goal before half-time▲ 89%73%▼ 67%
Goal after half-time▼ 78%89%• 89%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.91
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.49
Home goals / match
1.42
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+5%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
89%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. RandersYellow cardMathias Greve
  2. ViborgYellow cardJeppe Grønning
  3. RandersYellow cardLaurits Raun Pedersen
  4. ViborgSubstitutionOn: Philip KellerOff: Charly Ngos Nouck Horneman
  5. RandersYellow cardDaniel Høegh
  6. RandersSubstitutionOn: Hector Lux HøyrupOff: Mike Themsen

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Randers 1 - 0 - 1 Viborg. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Viborg FF
3 : 2
Randers FC
Randers FC
2 : 1
Viborg FF

FAQ

What was the result of Randers vs Viborg?

The Superliga match finished Randers 0:2 Viborg. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Randers and Viborg?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Randers won 1, Viborg won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Randers vs Viborg?

Randers score 1.22 goals per game on average and Viborg 1.67. The Superliga average is 2.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Randers's matches and 44% of Viborg's.

What form are Randers and Viborg in?

Over the last 5 games Randers have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Viborg 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Randers vs Viborg?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.