Ranheim vs Kongsvinger: match statistics
Ranheim vs Kongsvinger: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Ranheim played Kongsvinger in First Division (Norway). The match was played on 8 May 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Ranheim: 3-0-1, 2.25 points/match. Kongsvinger: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Ranheim scores 3.00 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Kongsvinger scores 2.40 and concedes 1.00. League average: 3.46 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Ranheim 50%, Kongsvinger 80%. Over 2.5: Ranheim 100%, Kongsvinger 100%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 74%.
xG, shots and style
Ranheim has higher xG: 1.72 vs 1.57. Ranheim: 14.8 shots per match, Kongsvinger: 12.4.
Match halves
Ranheim: half-time lead 75%, second-half goals 1.50. Kongsvinger: half-time lead 80%, second-half goals 1.40.
Goals by minute
Ranheim: 31-45+ (3 goals). Kongsvinger: 46-60 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division: 3.46 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 74%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Ranheim have strong home credentials: on average 4.5 goals scored per game with 18 shots and 9 on target, a conversion rate of 25% and an average xG of 2.05, while defensively they concede only 0.5 goals per game and have clean sheets in 50% of appearances. Kongsvinger arrive in excellent form — 4 wins and 1 draw in the last 5 matches and 2.6 points per match over that period; away they average 2.5 goals with xG 1.37, 11 shots and 5 on target, but concede 1.5 goals per game and have 0% clean sheets. Quality-of-chance comparison favors the hosts: higher xG (2.05 vs 1.37) and significantly more shots and shots on target (18/9 vs 11/5) increase Ranheim's scoring probability, despite the visitors posting 60% possession. In the last 5 matches Ranheim scored 14 and conceded 9, while Kongsvinger scored 12 and conceded 5, indicating better form for the visitors but greater defensive stability from the hosts at home (0.5 GA vs 1.5 GA for the visitors away). Considering the higher volume of chances, superior xG and Ranheim's 50% home clean sheets, I forecast a home win, although I expect an open, high-scoring game.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes — 85% vs 15% — because the data strongly indicates goals from both sides. Kongsvinger has a seasonal BTTS rate of 100% and 80% in the last 5 matches, while Ranheim is 67% seasonally and 60% in the last 5, which clearly favors a both-teams-to-score scenario. Both teams score frequently: averages of 2.33 goals (Ranheim) and 2.50 (Kongsvinger), with average goals conceded of 0.67 and 1.50 respectively; in the last 5 matches Ranheim conceded 1.8 goals and Kongsvinger 1.0. This is supported by xG (1.72 vs 1.37) and average shots on target (6 vs 5) plus high conversion rates (18% vs 23%), indicating both create and convert chances. Additionally, both teams have 100% of matches over 2.5 goals this season, the league average is 3.46 goals, and Kongsvinger has no clean sheets (0%), so the BTTS 'Yes' scenario is the strongest.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams demonstrate high goal-scoring potential: Ranheim averages 2.33 goals per home match, while Kongsvinger averages 2.50 away. Based on xG (1.72 for Ranheim and 1.37 for Kongsvinger) and xG against (1.52 and 1.51) I estimate 1.62 expected goals for the home side and 1.44 for the visitors, totalling 3.06 goals. Ranheim averages 13.33 shots with 6.0 on target and an 18% conversion rate, Kongsvinger 11 shots with 5.0 on target and a 23% conversion rate, which confirms a realistic scoring potential. Both teams have 100% of matches over 2.5 goals this season and 100% over 2.5 in the last 5 matches, therefore I recommend Over 2.5 as the strongest signal (88%). I rate Over 3.5 at 35% due to the moderate expected total of 3.06 goals and the fact Ranheim has 0% of matches over 3.5 this season, which limits the probability of 4+ goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Key signal: the visitors led at the break in 100% of their matches and average 1.5 goals by half-time versus 0.67 for the hosts, which favors Kongsvinger holding a lead after 45 minutes. At the same time Ranheim posts a higher match xG (1.72 vs 1.37), attempts more shots (13.33 vs 11.0) and scores significantly better after the break — on average 1.67 goals after half-time versus 1.0 for the visitors, and in the 46–60 minute window the hosts have scored 3 goals compared to 1 for Kongsvinger. The hosts also average 2.33 points after the break versus 1.5 for their opponents and win second halves in 67% of cases compared to 50% for Kongsvinger, which increases the realistic chance of a turnaround. Therefore the strongest scenario is the visitors leading at half-time and the hosts winning at full-time (HT/FT = 2/1) — I assign this roughly a 30% probability, while the visitors maintaining their half-time lead I estimate at about 16%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Ranheim | Kongsvinger | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 49% | 45% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.41 | 0.43 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Kongsvinger is 16% better for: last-5 form.
2.25 pts / match - Ranheim · 2.6 pts / match - Kongsvinger
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ranheim is 25% better for: goals scored per match.
3 goals / match - Ranheim · 2.4 goals / match - Kongsvinger
Kongsvinger is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.5 goals / match - Ranheim · 1 goals / match - Kongsvinger
Ranheim scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while Kongsvinger keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).
Kongsvinger scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while Ranheim keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ranheim
Over / Under - Kongsvinger
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kongsvinger is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.25 pts / match - Ranheim · 2.6 pts / match - Kongsvinger
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ranheim - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 75% of matches and wins 75%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Kongsvinger - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 80% of matches and wins 80%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.25 | 1.50 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 2.5 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 75% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 50% |
| Clean sheet | 75% | 25% |
| No goal | 25% | 25% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Ranheim
Kongsvinger
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Ranheim | Liga | Kongsvinger | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.50 | 3.46 | • 3.40 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 54% | ▲ 80% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 100% | 74% | ▲ 100% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 25% | 23% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 79% | • 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 87% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Ranheim 1 - 1 - 0 Kongsvinger. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Ranheim vs Kongsvinger?
The First Division match finished Ranheim 1:1 Kongsvinger. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Ranheim and Kongsvinger?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Ranheim won 1, Kongsvinger won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Ranheim vs Kongsvinger?
Ranheim score 3.00 goals per game on average and Kongsvinger 2.40. The First Division average is 3.46 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 74% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Ranheim's matches and 80% of Kongsvinger's.
What form are Ranheim and Kongsvinger in?
Over the last 5 games Ranheim have a 3-0-1 record (2.25 points per game) and Kongsvinger 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ranheim vs Kongsvinger?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Ranheim vs Kongsvinger: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


