Ranheim vs Moss: match statistics
Ranheim vs Moss: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Ranheim play Moss in First Division (Norway). The match date is 1 May 2026 at 20:00. Final score: 4:0.
Current form
Ranheim: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Moss: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Ranheim scores 2.43 and concedes 2.43 goals per match. Moss scores 1.64 and concedes 2.29. League average: 3.75 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Ranheim 79%, Moss 79%. Over 2.5: Ranheim 93%, Moss 86%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 73%.
xG, shots and style
xG is very similar for both teams. Ranheim: 14.5 shots per match, Moss: 14.6.
Match halves
Ranheim: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 1.36. Moss: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Ranheim: 46-60 (9 goals). Moss: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division: 3.75 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 73%.
Head-to-head
2 H2H matches: 0-1-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
I back Ranheim to win (1): the hosts have a clear advantage in chance creation — on average 19 shots and 10 on target per home match versus Moss’s 15.5 shots and 7 on target away, translating to an average of 5 goals scored by Ranheim at home versus 2 by Moss on the road. Ranheim’s conversion rate is markedly higher (26% vs 13%), and xG favors the hosts: xG 2.14 versus 1.96 for Moss, with Ranheim conceding only 0.79 xG at home while Moss concedes 1.58 xG away. Recent form over the last 5 matches in points is comparable (both average 1.8 points), but Ranheim has scored 13 goals with 3 wins in that span, whereas Moss has 8 goals and 3 wins — indicating greater offensive momentum for the hosts. Additionally, Ranheim has won all their home matches (100% wins), while Moss wins 50% of away games; both teams have 0% clean sheets and fail to score in 0% of matches, so I expect both sides to score, but Ranheim’s superiority in chances and finishing should decide the result in their favor.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Ranheim | Moss | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.44 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ranheim is 48% better for: goals scored per match.
2.43 goals / match - Ranheim · 1.64 goals / match - Moss
Moss is 6% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.43 goals / match - Ranheim · 2.29 goals / match - Moss
Ranheim scores in 86% of matches (12 of 14 matches), while Moss keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 14 matches).
Moss scores in 86% of matches (12 of 14 matches), while Ranheim keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Ranheim
Over / Under — Moss
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Ranheim is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.36 pts / match - Ranheim · 1.07 pts / match - Moss
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ranheim - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Moss - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 0% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 2.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Ranheim
Moss
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Ranheim | Liga | Moss | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.86 | 3.75 | ▲ 3.93 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 79% | 60% | ▲ 79% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 93% | 73% | ▲ 86% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 7% | 21% | ▼ 7% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 93% | 77% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 93% | 88% | ▲ 93% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Ranheim 0 - 1 - 1 Moss. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Ranheim vs Moss?
The First Division match finished Ranheim 4:0 Moss. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Ranheim and Moss?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Ranheim won 0, Moss won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Ranheim vs Moss?
Ranheim score 2.43 goals per game on average and Moss 1.64. The First Division average is 3.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 79% of Ranheim's matches and 79% of Moss's.
What form are Ranheim and Moss in?
Over the last 5 games Ranheim have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Moss 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ranheim vs Moss?
The statistical background for Ranheim vs Moss — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.