Rapid Wien II vs WSPG Wels: match statistics
Rapid Wien II vs WSPG Wels: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Rapid Wien II played WSPG Wels in 2. Liga (Austria). The match was played on 10 April 2026. Final score: 1:4.
Current form
Rapid Wien II: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. WSPG Wels: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Rapid Wien II scores 1.22 and concedes 1.52 goals per match. WSPG Wels scores 1.25 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.71 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Rapid Wien II 52%, WSPG Wels 54%. Over 2.5: Rapid Wien II 43%, WSPG Wels 42%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 49%.
xG, shots and style
Rapid Wien II has higher xG: 1.28 vs 1.27. Rapid Wien II: 9.7 shots per match, WSPG Wels: 10.0.
Match halves
Rapid Wien II: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.61. WSPG Wels: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.63.
Goals by minute
Rapid Wien II: 61-75 (8 goals). WSPG Wels: 46-60 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
2. Liga: 2.71 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 49%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Rapid Wien II holds a small but clear advantage in home metrics: they average 4.5 shots on target and 1.33 goals scored per home match while conceding 1.33, whereas WSPG Wels away averages 3.82 shots on target, 1.55 goals scored and concedes 2.00. Hosts are shut out in only 25% of home games, while visitors fail to score in 36% of away matches, giving Rapid greater offensive reliability. Quality of chances is similar by xG: Rapid posts 1.36 xG per home game versus Wels’ 1.30 xG away; despite Rapid facing a higher xG against (1.69 vs 1.41), they actually concede fewer goals (1.33 vs 2.00), which may indicate better defensive organization or goalkeeping. In the last 5 matches Rapid won 3 and averages 1.8 points per game, while Wels has 2 wins and 1.4 points per game; both teams conceded 7 goals in their last five matches, pointing to an open contest. Considering the hosts’ more consistent goal scoring, higher share of shots on target and the opponent’s higher away goals conceded, I predict a Rapid Wien II victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal metrics indicate a moderate edge for a BTTS scenario: Rapid Wien II has a seasonal BTTS rate of 54%, WSPG Wels 55%, league average 52%. Looking at goals-for and against, Rapid averages 1.00 scored and 1.08 conceded per match, while Wels scores 1.55 and concedes 2.00; their average xG are 1.24 (Rapid) and 1.30 (Wels), with xG against of 1.37 and 1.41, suggesting both sides generate and allow roughly 1.3 xG per game. In the last 5 matches there's a divergence: Rapid had BTTS in 20% of games and Wels in 80% (i.e. 1/5 and 4/5), providing a strong short-term signal for the visitors. Additionally, Wels have only 9% clean sheets this season versus 23% for Rapid, and season goals are Rapid 32-35 and Wels 30-36; similar shots on target (3.92 vs 3.82) and higher conversion rate for Wels (15% vs 10%) further increase the likelihood of mutual scoring. Combining the seasonal 54/55% and especially Wels’ high 80% in the last 5, the forecast is BTTS - Yes at 65% probability vs 35% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project approximately 1.35 goals for Rapid Wien II and 1.42 for WSPG Wels (total ~2.77), based on seasonal attacking xG of 1.24 (Rapid) and 1.30 (Wels) and opponents’ xG conceded of 1.41 (Wels) and 1.37 (Rapid), as well as 5-match form (Rapid xG 1.51, Wels xG 1.28). The strongest signal is Over 1.5: Rapid have 62% of matches with more than 1.5 goals, Wels 73%, average 67.5%, so I estimate the chance of Over 1.5 at 68%. Over 2.5 has a moderate edge — seasonally Rapid only 31% >2.5 vs Wels 55%, but in the last 5 matches both teams have 60% of games over 2.5 and the combined xG is 2.77, therefore I give Over 2.5 56%. Over 3.5 is unlikely: seasonally 15% (Rapid) and 45% (Wels), and the expected combined xG 2.77 is below 3.5, so Under 3.5 70%. Additionally, Wels average 10.45 shots with a 15% conversion (vs 9.54 and 10% for Rapid), which increases the scoring risk and supports Over 1.5 as the most reliable bet.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I select the 1/1 scenario (home team leading at Half-Time and winning at Full-Time) because Rapid Wien II has a seasonal points average of 1.31 versus 0.64 for WSPG Wels, and the visitors concede an average of 2.00 goals per match compared to 1.08 for the hosts. The hosts were leading at the break in 31% of their matches (4 instances in the data), while the visitors only in 9% (1 instance), and first-half goals average 0.62 for Rapid and 0.64 for Wels — at the same time Wels concedes on average 0.91 goals in the first half, which increases the probability of the hosts taking a lead at the break. After the break the visitors are vulnerable to conceding: WSPG Wels concedes an average of 1.09 goals in the second half away, and matches involving Wels have a seasonal goals average of 3.55 versus 2.08 for Rapid, so the game may be open and favor the better-organized defensive team at home. xG shows both teams create similar chances (1.24 xG for Rapid versus 1.30 xG for Wels), so Rapid’s advantage stems more from a lower goals-against average and home ground; therefore I rank 1/1 highest (30%), with X/1 second (20%) and X/X third (15%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Rapid Wien II | WSPG Wels | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Rapid Wien II is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Rapid Wien II · 1.4 pts / match - WSPG Wels
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Rapid Wien II scores in 70% of matches (16 of 23 matches), while WSPG Wels keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 24 matches).
WSPG Wels scores in 67% of matches (16 of 24 matches), while Rapid Wien II keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Rapid Wien II
Over / Under - WSPG Wels
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Rapid Wien II is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.43 pts / match - Rapid Wien II · 1.04 pts / match - WSPG Wels
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Rapid Wien II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 30%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
WSPG Wels - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Rapid Wien II
WSPG Wels
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Rapid Wien II | Liga | WSPG Wels | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.74 | 2.71 | • 2.75 |
| Both teams scored | • 52% | 53% | • 54% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 43% | 49% | ▼ 42% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 27% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | • 70% | 71% | • 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 74% | 76% | ▲ 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Rapid Wien II 0 - 0 - 1 WSPG Wels. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Rapid Wien II vs WSPG Wels?
The 2. Liga match finished Rapid Wien II 1:4 WSPG Wels. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Rapid Wien II vs WSPG Wels?
Rapid Wien II score 1.22 goals per game on average and WSPG Wels 1.25. The 2. Liga average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Rapid Wien II's matches and 54% of WSPG Wels's.
What form are Rapid Wien II and WSPG Wels in?
Over the last 5 games Rapid Wien II have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and WSPG Wels 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rapid Wien II vs WSPG Wels?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


