Rapperswil-Jona vs Wil: match statistics
Rapperswil-Jona vs Wil: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Rapperswil-Jona played Wil in Challenge League (Switzerland). The match was played on 11 April 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Rapperswil-Jona: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Wil: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Rapperswil-Jona scores 1.31 and concedes 1.72 goals per match. Wil scores 1.07 and concedes 1.48. League average: 2.94 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Rapperswil-Jona 59%, Wil 48%. Over 2.5: Rapperswil-Jona 62%, Wil 48%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 57%.
xG, shots and style
Wil has higher xG: 1.45 vs 1.35. Rapperswil-Jona: 10.9 shots per match, Wil: 12.7.
Match halves
Rapperswil-Jona: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.59. Wil: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.55.
Goals by minute
Rapperswil-Jona: 31-45+ (10 goals). Wil: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Challenge League: 2.94 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 57%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the away win (2). Wil averages 1.6 PPG in the last 5 matches versus Rapperswil-Jona’s 0.8 PPG; in that period the visitors scored 11 goals with 2 wins and 2 draws, while the hosts have 9 goals, 1 win and 1 draw. Defensively the edge is with Wil — they concede 1.43 goals on average away and have 36% clean sheets, whereas the hosts concede 1.86 at home with 29% clean sheets. Wil also generates more chances: away xG is 1.41 versus the hosts’ 1.31, they average 12.21 shots with 4.5 on target vs 10.43 and 3.5 for Rapperswil-Jona, although the hosts have a higher conversion rate (10% vs 8%) and more goals this season (38 vs 31). Considering superior form (1.6 vs 0.8 PPG), steadier defense and advantage in chance creation, I assign 50% to a Wil win, 25% to a draw and 25% to a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Recent indicators strongly favor BTTS - Yes: Rapperswil-Jona had BTTS in 80% of their last 5 matches and Wil in 60%, indicating a clear trend (4/5 and 3/5). On the season both teams average goals scored/conceded of 1.2/1.53 (Rapperswil-Jona) and 0.93/1.43 (Wil), while in the last 5 matches R-J scored 9 and conceded 11 (avg 1.8 scored, 2.2 conceded) and Wil scored 11 and conceded 8 (avg 2.2/1.6). xG confirms the exchange of chances: xG_for 1.49 (R-J) and 1.41 (Wil) with xG_against 1.43 and 1.79, and shots on target 4.07 vs 4.5 per match, which supports both teams finding the net. Seasonal BTTS rates are moderate (47% and 50%) but the league averages 54% BTTS, so the combination of weaker defenses (50 and 43 goals conceded this season) and recent good scoring form produces a stronger signal for "yes"; therefore BTTS probability is assessed at 68% vs 32% and I recommend backing "BTTS - Yes".
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project 1.64 xG for Rapperswil-Jona and 1.42 xG for Wil, totalling 3.06 expected goals; these values derive from the home attack xG 1.49 versus Wil’s conceded xG 1.79, and Wil’s attack xG 1.41 versus the home conceded xG 1.43. Season metrics show 60% of Rapperswil-Jona’s matches and 79% of Wil’s matches finish Over 1.5 goals, and the league average goals is 2.93, supporting an expectation of at least 2 goals. In the last 5 matches the home side scored 1.8 and conceded 2.2 on average, while the visitors scored 2.2 and conceded 1.6, which further increases the match tempo and goal probability (home team has 80% Over 2.5 in the last 5). Based on this I estimate probabilities of Over 1.5 at ~81%, Over 2.5 at ~59% and Over 3.5 at ~37%. Therefore I recommend a bet on Over 1.5 as the strongest signal, because the projected total of 3.06 goals, the season Over 1.5 rates of 60%/79% and the fact that both teams have 47% and 50% chances to score give an edge for a minimum of 2 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely Half-Time result is a draw: the home team were level at the break in 60% of matches and the visitors in 43%, so I expect a draw after 45 minutes. The first half is generally low-scoring — the home side average 0.53 goals by half-time versus 0.50 for the away side, and concede 0.60 vs 0.64, which limits the number of goals before the break. After the interval the situation favours the home team: they average 0.67 goals in the second half versus 0.43 for the visitors, have an average of 1.6 goals after the break compared to 1.21 for opponents, and 73% of matches see at least one goal after half-time (vs 56% for the away side). The hosts are also stronger at home (33% home wins vs 21% for the away team; average points per match 1.27 vs 1.00) and generate 1.49 xG while opponents give up 1.79 xG, which increases the chance of home goals. On this basis the strongest signal is Half-Time draw and Full-Time home win (X/1), with the second most likely scenario being a full-time draw (X/X).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Rapperswil-Jona | Wil | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Wil is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Rapperswil-Jona · 1.6 pts / match - Wil
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Rapperswil-Jona is 22% better for: goals scored per match.
1.31 goals / match - Rapperswil-Jona · 1.07 goals / match - Wil
Wil is 16% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.72 goals / match - Rapperswil-Jona · 1.48 goals / match - Wil
Rapperswil-Jona scores in 79% of matches (23 of 29 matches), while Wil keeps a clean sheet in 38% (11 of 29 matches).
Wil scores in 66% of matches (19 of 29 matches), while Rapperswil-Jona keeps a clean sheet in 24% (7 of 29 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Rapperswil-Jona
Over / Under - Wil
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Rapperswil-Jona - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Wil - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Rapperswil-Jona
Wil
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Challenge League).
Teams vs league
| Rapperswil-Jona | Liga | Wil | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.03 | 2.94 | ▼ 2.55 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 59% | 55% | ▼ 48% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 62% | 57% | ▼ 48% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 24% | 26% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 66% | 68% | ▼ 55% |
| Goal after half-time | • 79% | 80% | ▼ 66% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Rapperswil-Jona 2 - 0 - 1 Wil. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Rapperswil-Jona vs Wil?
The Challenge League match finished Rapperswil-Jona 2:0 Wil. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Rapperswil-Jona and Wil?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Rapperswil-Jona won 2, Wil won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Rapperswil-Jona vs Wil?
Rapperswil-Jona score 1.31 goals per game on average and Wil 1.07. The Challenge League average is 2.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Rapperswil-Jona's matches and 48% of Wil's.
What form are Rapperswil-Jona and Wil in?
Over the last 5 games Rapperswil-Jona have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Wil 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rapperswil-Jona vs Wil?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


