Norway - First DivisionData current as of 12 September 2026

Raufoss vs Hødd: match statistics

Raufoss crest
Raufoss
1 : 1half-time 1:1
Hødd crest
Hødd

Raufoss vs Hødd: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Raufoss played Hødd in First Division (Norway). The match was played on 26 April 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Raufoss: 0-0-2, 0.00 points/match. Hødd: 1-0-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Raufoss scores 1.00 and concedes 4.00 goals per match. Hødd scores 0.67 and concedes 1.33. League average: 3.72 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Raufoss 100%, Hødd 33%. Over 2.5: Raufoss 100%, Hødd 33%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 80%.

xG, shots and style

Raufoss has higher xG: 1.18 vs 1.06. Raufoss: 9.5 shots per match, Hødd: 7.7.

Match halves

Raufoss: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.50. Hødd: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.33.

Goals by minute

Raufoss: 31-45+ (1 goals). Hødd: 0-15 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division: 3.72 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 80%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 6.50, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Raufoss possesses a clear advantage in chance creation at home: on average 12 shots and 5 shots on target per match with an xG of 1.57, whereas Hødd records 9 shots, 2 on target and xG 1.11 away. Raufoss scores on average 1 goal per home match and has 7 goals in the last 5 fixtures (1.4 per game), while Hødd’s away goal average is 0 and they have only 2 goals in their last 5 matches combined. The hosts’ vulnerability is defense — Raufoss concedes 3 goals per home match on average and has conceded 8 this season; in the last 5 matches they average 0.8 points per game, whereas Hødd averages 1.0 point per away match and concedes 1 goal away (4 this season), which mitigates Raufoss’s edge. Hødd controls possession (57% away) but have failed to score in 100% of their away games and show virtually 0 shot conversion, indicating severe finishing issues. Considering Raufoss’s superiority in chance creation and finishing (xG 1.57 vs 1.11, 5 vs 2 shots on target) and Hødd’s zero away efficiency, I forecast a home victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The dominant signal for BTTS - Yes is the high share of both-teams-to-score matches for the home side in the short term: Raufoss has 80% BTTS in the last 5 matches versus 20% for Hødd. Additionally, the league averages 55% BTTS matches, which raises the baseline probability. Raufoss concedes on average 2.2 goals per match over the last 5, while Hødd generates xG 1.08 per match in the same period, suggesting Hødd has a realistic chance of at least one goal. Against this is Hødd’s poor finishing (conversion rate 0% and on average 0.4 goals per match in the last 5), but season-long figures show Raufoss BTTS 50% and Hødd 0%, yielding mixed signals. Overall I rate the outcome 65% for 'yes' and 35% for 'no', selecting 'yes' as the more likely scenario.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Based on xG: the home side has an attacking xG of 1.04 while the visitors’ defensive xG_against is 1.85, producing an expected 1.45 goals for Raufoss; the away attack at 1.11 vs the hosts’ defense xG_against 1.58 yields 1.35 goals — totaling approximately 2.80 goals. In the last 5 matches Raufoss scored 7 goals (1.4 per game) and conceded 11 (2.2 per game), while Hødd scored 2 (0.4) and conceded 4 (0.8), indicating significant home defensive vulnerability. Raufoss averages 4.5 shots on target versus Hødd’s 2.0, and the league averages 3.82 goals per game with 82% of matches over 2.5, further favoring higher-scoring outcomes. From a Poisson model with a total of 2.80, probabilities are roughly 77% for Over 1.5 (Over 2.5 ~53%, Over 3.5 ~31%), therefore the strongest data-driven signal is a bet on Over 1.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Raufoss as the home team has a 50% home win rate and leads at the break in 50% of matches, while Hødd has 0% wins and 0% leads at half-time, with the away side surrendering a lead at the break in 100% of cases. The hosts average 4.5 shots on target per match versus Hødd's 2.0 and have a conversion rate of 14% compared to 0% for the visitors, translating to an average of 0.5 Raufoss goals by half-time and 1.0 goals per match. Although xG is similar (1.04 for Raufoss vs 1.11 for Hødd), Hødd concedes a higher opponent xG (1.85 vs 1.58 for the hosts) and fails to convert chances, so they are unlikely to produce a turnaround after the break. In the last five matches Raufoss scored seven goals by half-time (0.6 average) versus Hødd's three goals (0.2 average), therefore the most probable scenario is Raufoss leading at half-time and the home win (HT/FT: lead at the break/home win) after 90 minutes.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
RaufossHødd
9Shots8
RaufossHødd
2Shots on target4
RaufossHødd
1xG1.01
RaufossHødd
4Corners8
RaufossHødd
41Dangerous attacks31
RaufossHødd
15Fouls8
RaufossHødd
3Cards1
RaufossHødd

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match0.67
RaufossHødd
4Goals conceded / match1.33
RaufossHødd
49%Average possession53%
RaufossHødd
3Shots on target / match3.67
RaufossHødd

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.5Shots per match7.67
RaufossHødd
3Shots on target3.67
RaufossHødd
10.5%Shot conversion8.7%
RaufossHødd
49%Possession53%
RaufossHødd
1.18xG for1.06
RaufossHødd
1.8xG against1.66
RaufossHødd

Shooting quality

Raufoss: BalancedHødd: Balanced
RaufossHødd
Accuracy (shots on target)32%48%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.18

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Raufoss
LL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W0% D100% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-0-2
0.00 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-2
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 at home
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 4.0xG: 1.18Opponent xG: 1.80BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Hødd
WLL
Season result split
33% W0% D67% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 away
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.7Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 1.66BTTS: 33%Over 2.5: 33%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Raufoss is 49% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Raufoss · 0.67 goals / match - Hødd

Hødd is 201% better for: goals conceded per match.

4 goals / match - Raufoss · 1.33 goals / match - Hødd

Raufoss scoring profile: very strong

Raufoss scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Hødd keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 matches).

Hødd scoring profile: strong

Hødd scores in 33% of matches (1 of 3 matches), while Raufoss keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).

2Goals scored (season)2
RaufossHødd
8Goals conceded (season)4
RaufossHødd
5Average goals in match2
RaufossHødd
2Goals scored (last 5)2
RaufossHødd
8Goals conceded (last 5)4
RaufossHødd

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal33%
RaufossHødd
0%2 goals33%
RaufossHødd
0%3 goals0%
RaufossHødd
0%4 goals0%
RaufossHødd

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
RaufossHødd
100%2 goals33%
RaufossHødd
100%3 goals0%
RaufossHødd
50%4 goals0%
RaufossHødd

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

50%BTTS at half-time0%
RaufossHødd
0%BTTS in both halves0%
RaufossHødd
0%Scored in both halves33%
RaufossHødd

BTTS and goal count

100%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
RaufossHødd
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
RaufossHødd
100%BTTS - last 533%
RaufossHødd

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
RaufossHødd
100%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
RaufossHødd
50%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
RaufossHødd

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
RaufossHødd
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
RaufossHødd
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
RaufossHødd

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Raufoss - half-time state
0% leading0% draw100% trailing
Hødd - half-time state
33% leading0% draw67% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0Points per match (1st half)1
RaufossHødd
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.33
RaufossHødd
2Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
RaufossHødd
2.5Average goals (1st half)1
RaufossHødd
0%Clean sheet before half-time33%
RaufossHødd
50%No goal before half-time67%
RaufossHødd

After half-time (2nd half)

0Points per match (2nd half)0.67
RaufossHødd
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.33
RaufossHødd
2Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
RaufossHødd
2.5Average goals (2nd half)1
RaufossHødd
0%Clean sheet after half-time33%
RaufossHødd
50%No goal after half-time67%
RaufossHødd

Raufoss - second-half results

0% W0% D100% L
0
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
0
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Hødd - second-half results

0% W67% D33% L
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
2
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Raufoss - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.000.00
Goals scored / match0.50.5
Goals conceded / match2.02.0
Average goals in match2.52.5
1 goal100%100%
2 goals100%50%
3 goals50%50%
Clean sheet0%0%
No goal50%50%
Goal difference-3-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 0% draw - 100% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 1
Hødd - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.67
Goals scored / match0.30.3
Goals conceded / match0.70.7
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal100%67%
2 goals0%33%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet33%33%
No goal67%67%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 33% leading - 0% draw - 67% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 67% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Raufoss
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
0
2
16-30
1
0
31-45
1
3
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Hødd
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
1
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 2.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+86%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
33%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Raufoss

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.62
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-2.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-2.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
50%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
233%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Hødd

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.60
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.39
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
39%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
67%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 50% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).

Teams vs league

RaufossLigaHødd
Average goals in match 5.003.72 2.00
Both teams scored 100%56% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 100%80% 33%
Clean sheets 0%22% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%80% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%88% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.72
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
80%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
2.00
Home goals / match
1.72
Away goals / match
+16%
Home attack advantage
+14%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
68%
2 goals
44%
3 goals
16%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. RaufossYellow cardFilip Fjeldheim Da Silva
  2. RaufossSubstitutionOn: Mads Orrhaug LarsenOff: Nicolai Fremstad
  3. RaufossYellow cardTorje Naustdal
  4. HøddSubstitutionOn: Matthew ScarcellaOff: Halvard Kvamme Urnes
  5. HøddYellow cardVillum Dalsgaard

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Raufoss 2 - 0 - 0 Hødd. Average goals 6.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.

IL Hødd
2 : 4
Raufoss IL
Raufoss IL
6 : 1
IL Hødd

FAQ

What was the result of Raufoss vs Hødd?

The First Division match finished Raufoss 1:1 Hødd. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Raufoss and Hødd?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Raufoss won 2, Hødd won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 6.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Raufoss vs Hødd?

Raufoss score 1.00 goals per game on average and Hødd 0.67. The First Division average is 3.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 80% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Raufoss's matches and 33% of Hødd's.

What form are Raufoss and Hødd in?

Over the last 5 games Raufoss have a 0-0-2 record (0.00 points per game) and Hødd 1-0-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Raufoss vs Hødd?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.