Egypt - Second DivisionData current as of 12 September 2026

Raya Ghazl vs Tanta SC: match statistics

Raya Ghazl crest
Raya Ghazl
1 : 4half-time 0:1
Tanta SC crest
Tanta SC

Raya Ghazl vs Tanta SC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Raya Ghazl played Tanta SC in Second Division (Egypt). The match was played on 7 May 2026. Final score: 1:4.

Current form

Raya Ghazl: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. Tanta SC: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Raya Ghazl scores 0.59 and concedes 1.34 goals per match. Tanta SC scores 0.69 and concedes 1.06. League average: 1.93 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Raya Ghazl 41%, Tanta SC 50%. Over 2.5: Raya Ghazl 41%, Tanta SC 22%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.

xG, shots and style

Tanta SC has higher xG: 1.23 vs 1.10. Raya Ghazl: 6.9 shots per match, Tanta SC: 7.2.

Match halves

Raya Ghazl: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.38. Tanta SC: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.28.

Goals by minute

Raya Ghazl: 76-90+ (8 goals). Tanta SC: 16-30 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 1.93 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a draw (X). Away side Tanta has a high draw rate on the road — 56% — while hosts Raya Ghazl are in crisis: in their last 5 matches they have 0 wins, 5 losses and have scored only 1 goal. Defensively Tanta performs better: Raya concedes on average 1.44 goals at home (43 conceded this season), whereas Tanta concedes 1.00 goals away (34 conceded this season) and has a higher clean sheet percentage (31% vs 19%). Offensively hosts are more efficient at converting chances at home (13% shot conversion and on average 1.0 goals per game), while Tanta generates higher xG on the road (1.25 vs 1.11 for Raya) but converts it less effectively (averaging 0.63 goals away). Considering Raya’s poor form, the visitors’ defensive edge and Tanta’s high draw rate, the most likely scenario is a low-scoring draw; estimates: 20% home, 50% draw, 30% away.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I back No BTTS because both teams show low scoring efficiency and in many matches at least one side fails to score. Raya Ghazl averages 0.75 goals this season but in the last 5 matches has only 0.2 goals per game (1 goal total) and a run of 5 defeats, which greatly limits their scoring chances. Tanta SC has a seasonal average of 0.63 goals and failed to score in 56% of matches this season, although they scored 5 goals in the last 5 games (1.0 avg) — indicating significant offensive inconsistency. Both teams have xG around 1.22–1.25, but conversion is low (9% vs 7%) and actual goals per game are much lower (0.75 vs 0.63), while the league BTTS rate is only 41%, so No BTTS appears more likely (~65% vs 35%).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The combined xG is 2.47 (1.22 + 1.25), but the season goal averages are only 0.75 for Raya Ghazl and 0.63 for Tanta SC (total 1.38), indicating poor finishing. In the last 5 matches the hosts averaged 0.2 goals and the visitors 1.0, with average goals conceded 2.0 (hosts) and 1.8 (guests), so the home side’s form reduces the match’s goal potential. Season percentages for matches over 2.5 are only 19% (Raya) and 25% (Tanta) — ~22% on average — while over 1.5 are 63% and 50%, supporting a moderate probability for Over 1.5 (≈60%). Considering goal conversion (season averages 0.75 and 0.63 vs xG 1.22 and 1.25) I project about 0.85 goals for the hosts and 1.05 for the visitors (total 1.90); therefore the strongest signal from the data is Under 2.5 (under ~72% vs over ~28%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time (X/X). Both teams have frequently been level at the break: the home side in 50% of matches and the visitors in 69%, averaging around 60%, which strongly supports a half-time draw. A full-time draw is also common — the hosts draw 50% of their games and the visitors 56% (approximately 53% on average) — and xG is balanced: 1.22 for Raya Ghazl versus 1.25 for Tanta SC, so there is no clear offensive advantage. Additionally, the home team’s form shows 0 wins in the last 5 matches (5 losses), while the visitors have 1 win and 2 draws in their last 5 (20% wins, 40% draws), giving the visitors a slight form edge that does not negate the prevailing draw signal; therefore X/X received the highest probability at 42%.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 3
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
Raya GhazlTanta SC
7Shots14
Raya GhazlTanta SC
5Shots on target8
Raya GhazlTanta SC
1.27xG2.32
Raya GhazlTanta SC
0Corners4
Raya GhazlTanta SC
64Dangerous attacks121
Raya GhazlTanta SC
4Fouls17
Raya GhazlTanta SC
0Cards0
Raya GhazlTanta SC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Raya GhazlTanta SC
0.59Goals scored / match0.69
Raya GhazlTanta SC
1.34Goals conceded / match1.06
Raya GhazlTanta SC
39%Average possession46%
Raya GhazlTanta SC
2.44Shots on target / match2.91
Raya GhazlTanta SC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.91Shots per match7.16
Raya GhazlTanta SC
2.44Shots on target2.91
Raya GhazlTanta SC
8.6%Shot conversion9.6%
Raya GhazlTanta SC
39%Possession46%
Raya GhazlTanta SC
1.1xG for1.23
Raya GhazlTanta SC
1.48xG against1.25
Raya GhazlTanta SC

Shooting quality

Raya Ghazl: BalancedTanta SC: Balanced
Raya GhazlTanta SC
Accuracy (shots on target)35%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Raya Ghazl
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
13% W31% D56% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-10-18
0.69 pts / match · goal difference -24
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-4-8
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DWDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 0.71Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Tanta SC
LWDLD
Season result split
13% W53% D34% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-17-11
0.91 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-9-5
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DDDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tanta SC is 17% better for: goals scored per match.

0.59 goals / match - Raya Ghazl · 0.69 goals / match - Tanta SC

Tanta SC is 26% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.34 goals / match - Raya Ghazl · 1.06 goals / match - Tanta SC

Raya Ghazl scoring profile: mixed

Raya Ghazl scores in 47% of matches (15 of 32 matches), while Tanta SC keeps a clean sheet in 25% (8 of 32 matches).

Tanta SC scoring profile: strong

Tanta SC scores in 56% of matches (18 of 32 matches), while Raya Ghazl keeps a clean sheet in 25% (8 of 32 matches).

19Goals scored (season)22
Raya GhazlTanta SC
43Goals conceded (season)34
Raya GhazlTanta SC
1.94Average goals in match1.75
Raya GhazlTanta SC
1Goals scored (last 5)5
Raya GhazlTanta SC
10Goals conceded (last 5)9
Raya GhazlTanta SC

How often they score at least...

47%1 goal56%
Raya GhazlTanta SC
13%2 goals9%
Raya GhazlTanta SC
0%3 goals3%
Raya GhazlTanta SC
0%4 goals0%
Raya GhazlTanta SC

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal75%
Raya GhazlTanta SC
41%2 goals22%
Raya GhazlTanta SC
16%3 goals6%
Raya GhazlTanta SC
3%4 goals3%
Raya GhazlTanta SC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

41%
League average

Goal patterns

9%BTTS at half-time16%
Raya GhazlTanta SC
0%BTTS in both halves3%
Raya GhazlTanta SC
13%Scored in both halves6%
Raya GhazlTanta SC

BTTS and goal count

31%Min. 3 goals and BTTS19%
Raya GhazlTanta SC
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Raya GhazlTanta SC
20%BTTS - last 560%
Raya GhazlTanta SC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

47%Min. 1 goal before half-time56%
Raya GhazlTanta SC
9%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
Raya GhazlTanta SC
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Raya GhazlTanta SC

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time66%
Raya GhazlTanta SC
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
Raya GhazlTanta SC
16%Min. 3 goals after half-time3%
Raya GhazlTanta SC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tanta SC is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.97 pts / match - Raya Ghazl · 1.16 pts / match - Tanta SC

Raya Ghazl - half-time state
13% leading59% draw28% trailing
Tanta SC - half-time state
19% leading59% draw22% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.97Points per match (1st half)1.16
Raya GhazlTanta SC
0.22Goals scored (1st half)0.41
Raya GhazlTanta SC
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)0.41
Raya GhazlTanta SC
0.59Average goals (1st half)0.81
Raya GhazlTanta SC
66%Clean sheet before half-time63%
Raya GhazlTanta SC
78%No goal before half-time66%
Raya GhazlTanta SC

After half-time (2nd half)

0.88Points per match (2nd half)0.91
Raya GhazlTanta SC
0.38Goals scored (2nd half)0.28
Raya GhazlTanta SC
0.97Goals conceded (2nd half)0.66
Raya GhazlTanta SC
1.34Average goals (2nd half)0.94
Raya GhazlTanta SC
41%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Raya GhazlTanta SC
63%No goal after half-time72%
Raya GhazlTanta SC

Raya Ghazl - second-half results

19% W31% D50% L
31
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-19
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.97
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 13%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tanta SC - second-half results

16% W44% D41% L
37
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.16
PPG before half-time
Lead holding68%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 13%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Raya Ghazl - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.20
Goals scored / match0.20.0
Goals conceded / match0.61.4
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference-2-7
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Tanta SC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.61.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Raya Ghazl
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
3
2
16-30
3
8
31-45
1
7
46-60
3
7
61-75
8
17
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

Tanta SC
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
7
3
16-30
4
8
31-45
3
3
46-60
1
6
61-75
5
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.84
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-46%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
26%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
23%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Raya Ghazl

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.37
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.51
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
58%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
146%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.69
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
42% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
42%

Tanta SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.54
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.09
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

Raya GhazlLigaTanta SC
Average goals in match 1.941.93 1.75
Both teams scored 41%41% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 41%32% 22%
Clean sheets 25%38% 25%
Goal before half-time 47%53% 56%
Goal after half-time 78%68% 66%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.93
Average goals per match
41%
Both teams scored
32%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
1.01
Home goals / match
0.92
Away goals / match
+10%
Home attack advantage
+9%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
53%
1 goal
18%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Raya Ghazl 0 - 0 - 1 Tanta SC. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Raya Ghazl vs Tanta SC?

The Second Division match finished Raya Ghazl 1:4 Tanta SC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Raya Ghazl vs Tanta SC?

Raya Ghazl score 0.59 goals per game on average and Tanta SC 0.69. The Second Division average is 1.93 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Raya Ghazl's matches and 50% of Tanta SC's.

What form are Raya Ghazl and Tanta SC in?

Over the last 5 games Raya Ghazl have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Tanta SC 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Raya Ghazl vs Tanta SC?

The statistical background for Raya Ghazl vs Tanta SC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.