Reading vs Rotherham United: match statistics
Reading vs Rotherham United: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Reading played Rotherham United in EFL League One (England). The match was played on 22 November 2025. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Reading: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Rotherham United: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Reading scores 1.07 and concedes 1.27 goals per match. Rotherham United scores 1.13 and concedes 1.13. League average: 2.46 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Reading 67%, Rotherham United 44%. Over 2.5: Reading 33%, Rotherham United 56%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 46%.
xG, shots and style
Reading has higher xG: 1.41 vs 1.07. Reading: 12.3 shots per match, Rotherham United: 8.8.
Match halves
Reading: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.60. Rotherham United: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.63.
Goals by minute
Reading: 61-75 (6 goals). Rotherham United: 46-60 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
League One: 2.46 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 46%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Reading | Rotherham United | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Rotherham United is 38% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Reading · 2.2 pts / match - Rotherham United
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Rotherham United is 6% better for: goals scored per match.
1.07 goals / match - Reading · 1.13 goals / match - Rotherham United
Rotherham United is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.27 goals / match - Reading · 1.13 goals / match - Rotherham United
Reading scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while Rotherham United keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 matches).
Rotherham United scores in 69% of matches (11 of 16 matches), while Reading keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Reading
Over / Under - Rotherham United
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Rotherham United is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.27 pts / match - Reading · 1.44 pts / match - Rotherham United
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Reading - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Rotherham United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Reading
Rotherham United
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).
Teams vs league
| Reading | Liga | Rotherham United | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.33 | 2.46 | ▼ 2.25 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 49% | ▼ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 46% | ▲ 56% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 28% | ▲ 31% |
| Goal before half-time | • 67% | 67% | ▲ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 87% | 83% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Reading vs Rotherham United?
The EFL League One match finished Reading 1:1 Rotherham United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Reading vs Rotherham United?
Reading score 1.07 goals per game on average and Rotherham United 1.13. The EFL League One average is 2.46 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Reading's matches and 44% of Rotherham United's.
What form are Reading and Rotherham United in?
Over the last 5 games Reading have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Rotherham United 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Reading vs Rotherham United?
The statistical background for Reading vs Rotherham United — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.