Real Salt Lake vs Inter Miami: match statistics
Real Salt Lake vs Inter Miami: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Real Salt Lake played Inter Miami in MLS (United States). The match was played on 23 April 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Real Salt Lake: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Inter Miami: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Real Salt Lake scores 2.29 and concedes 1.43 goals per match. Inter Miami scores 2.00 and concedes 1.75. League average: 3.26 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Real Salt Lake 86%, Inter Miami 75%. Over 2.5: Real Salt Lake 86%, Inter Miami 88%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 64%.
xG, shots and style
Real Salt Lake has higher xG: 1.77 vs 1.58. Real Salt Lake: 16.9 shots per match, Inter Miami: 14.4.
Match halves
Real Salt Lake: half-time lead 57%, second-half goals 0.71. Inter Miami: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 1.13.
Goals by minute
Real Salt Lake: 16-30 (5 goals). Inter Miami: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS: 3.26 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 64%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win (1). Real Salt Lake have won all home matches at their stadium (100% wins, 0% losses) and average 2.75 goals per home game with an average xG of 2.07, while Inter Miami average 2.00 goals away with an xG of 1.32. The hosts generate substantially more chances — on average 19 shots and 7.25 shots on target at home versus 11.83 shots and 4.83 on target for Inter on the road — despite Inter having higher possession (57% vs 49%). In the last 5 matches Real have 4 wins and 1 draw with 14 goals scored (2.8 goals per game), and Inter have 2 wins and 3 draws with 11 goals (2.2 goals per game); additionally Inter failed to score in 33% of away games, whereas RSL have not had that issue at home (0%). Defensively RSL concede 1.25 goals per home match (xG against 1.19) versus 1.67 conceded by Inter away (xG against 1.36), which confirms the home side’s advantage in creating and converting scoring opportunities.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The 'Both Teams To Score' outcome is the most likely: Real Salt Lake has a season BTTS rate of 100% and BTTS in the last 5 matches also 100%. Inter Miami has a season BTTS of 67% and 100% BTTS in the last 5 matches, with both teams conceding on average 1.6 (Real Salt Lake) and 1.8 (Inter Miami) goals in their last 5 games. Real Salt Lake generates xG 2.36 with an average of 22 shots and 7.5 on target per match, while Inter Miami posts xG 1.32 with 11.83 shots and 4.83 on target but a higher conversion rate (17% vs 9%), which increases their chance to score despite fewer chances. Additionally, Real Salt Lake has no clean sheets this season (0%), and Inter Miami only 17% clean sheets, with fixtures involving these teams frequently exceeding 2.5 goals (100% and 83%). In light of this data I give a strong signal for BTTS - Yes and propose a probability split of 85% for BTTS Yes and 15% for BTTS No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Calculated xG-based expected goals: Real Salt Lake has xG_for 2.36 and Inter Miami xG_against 1.36, yielding 1.86 expected goals for the home side; Inter Miami has xG_for 1.32 versus Real’s xG_against 0.83, yielding 1.08 expected goals for the away side, total = 2.94. Real creates significantly more chances (22.0 shots and 7.5 on target per match) versus Inter’s 11.83 and 4.83; despite a lower conversion rate for the hosts (9% vs 17%), the advantage in xG and shot volume increases the likelihood of goals. Seasonal Over metrics confirm offensive profiles: Real has 100% of matches over 2.5 goals, Inter 83%, and in the last 5 matches Over2.5 stands at 100% for Real and 80% for Inter; both teams scored 14 and 11 goals respectively in their last 5 matches. From a Poisson model with lambda=2.94 there is ~79% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), ~56% for minimum 3 goals (Over 2.5) and ~34% for minimum 4 goals (Over 3.5), therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (79% vs 21%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Real Salt Lake has a clear advantage in quality and volume of chances: xG 2.36 versus Inter Miami’s 1.32, averaging 22 shots to 11.83 and 7.5 shots on target to 4.83, indicating greater home pressure. In their last five matches Real Salt Lake’s form is W W D W W (80% wins) and they led at the break in 60% of games, while Inter Miami’s form is D W D D W (40% wins) and they led at the break in 40%. However, Real Salt Lake posts a lower shot conversion rate (9%) compared to Inter Miami (17%), which partially limits the xG advantage; nevertheless the hosts average 1.0 goals by half-time and 100% of their matches have seen at least one goal before the break. Inter Miami have collected 8 points at half-time this season, averaging 1.33 half-time points per match, showing the visitors can be dangerous by the break, but the overall xG balance and shot numbers favor Real Salt Lake. Therefore the most reliable scenario is the hosts leading at half-time and winning full-time (1/1) as the primary pick, with the alternative of a half-time draw and Real Salt Lake full-time turnaround (x/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Real Salt Lake | Inter Miami | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.10 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Real Salt Lake is 44% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / match - Real Salt Lake · 1.8 pts / match - Inter Miami
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Real Salt Lake is 15% better for: goals scored per match.
2.29 goals / match - Real Salt Lake · 2 goals / match - Inter Miami
Real Salt Lake is 22% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.43 goals / match - Real Salt Lake · 1.75 goals / match - Inter Miami
Real Salt Lake scores in 86% of matches (6 of 7 matches), while Inter Miami keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 matches).
Inter Miami scores in 75% of matches (6 of 8 matches), while Real Salt Lake keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 7 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Real Salt Lake
Over / Under - Inter Miami
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Real Salt Lake is 71% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.14 pts / match - Real Salt Lake · 1.25 pts / match - Inter Miami
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Real Salt Lake - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 57% of matches and wins 71%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Inter Miami - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 2.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 2.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 0% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +6 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Real Salt Lake
Inter Miami
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).
Teams vs league
| Real Salt Lake | Liga | Inter Miami | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.71 | 3.26 | ▲ 3.75 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 86% | 58% | ▲ 75% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 86% | 64% | ▲ 88% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 24% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 86% | 74% | ▲ 88% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 81% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Real Salt Lake vs Inter Miami?
The MLS match finished Real Salt Lake 0:2 Inter Miami. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Real Salt Lake vs Inter Miami?
Real Salt Lake score 2.29 goals per game on average and Inter Miami 2.00. The MLS average is 3.26 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 86% of Real Salt Lake's matches and 75% of Inter Miami's.
What form are Real Salt Lake and Inter Miami in?
Over the last 5 games Real Salt Lake have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Inter Miami 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Real Salt Lake vs Inter Miami?
The statistical background for Real Salt Lake vs Inter Miami — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


