Real Zaragoza vs Ceuta: match statistics
Real Zaragoza vs Ceuta: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Real Zaragoza played Ceuta in Segunda División (Spain). The match was played on 18 April 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
Real Zaragoza: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Ceuta: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Real Zaragoza scores 0.89 and concedes 1.34 goals per match. Ceuta scores 1.20 and concedes 1.57. League average: 2.60 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Real Zaragoza 51%, Ceuta 54%. Over 2.5: Real Zaragoza 34%, Ceuta 57%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 49%.
xG, shots and style
Real Zaragoza has higher xG: 1.34 vs 1.26. Real Zaragoza: 12.3 shots per match, Ceuta: 10.7.
Match halves
Real Zaragoza: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.54. Ceuta: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.49.
Goals by minute
Real Zaragoza: 76-90+ (13 goals). Ceuta: 0-15 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Segunda División: 2.60 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 49%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Real Zaragoza has a statistical edge in chance creation at home: average xG is 1.35 with 12.53 shots per match and 3.53 shots on target, while Ceuta away posts average xG 1.05, 9.17 shots and 2.78 shots on target. Defensively the hosts also perform better — Zaragoza concedes on average 1.35 goals per home match and records 29% clean sheets, while Ceuta concedes 2.06 goals away with 22% clean sheets; in the last 5 matches the visitors have conceded 10 goals, the hosts 6. Ceuta, however, have a better overall season record (14 wins and 42 goals scored versus Real’s 8 wins and 31 goals) and a higher finishing efficiency (conversion 10% vs 7%), which gives them a real attacking threat. In form, Zaragoza over the last 5 matches have 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, averaging 0.8 points per match, while Ceuta are 1-2-2 averaging 1.0 point per match, so the visitors’ form advantage is marginal. Considering the higher xG (1.35 vs 1.05), greater shot volume (12.53 vs 9.17) and Ceuta’s markedly weaker defence (2.06 goals conceded away vs 1.35 for the hosts), I forecast a Real Zaragoza win and assess probabilities as 60% home, 22% draw and 18% away.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes at 65% vs 35% No because signals for both teams scoring are stronger. Real Zaragoza has BTTS in 59% of home matches, averages 1.47 goals at home (xG 1.47) and registers 4.65 shots on target per match, increasing their chance to score against this opponent. Ceuta concedes an average of 2.06 goals away and has let in 10 goals in the last 5 matches (2.0 avg), with a recent opposition xG of 1.42, so the hosts are highly likely to find the net. Ceuta averages 0.94 goals away, but has scored 5 goals in the last 5 matches (1.0 per match) and both teams have 60% BTTS in their last 5 meetings, which raises the likelihood of the visitors scoring. Additionally, Zaragoza has only 29% clean sheets this season, Ceuta 22%, and the league BTTS rate is 55% — all figures support a Both Teams To Score outcome.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I expect a total goal count of around 2.70 (1.58 for Real Zaragoza and 1.12 for Ceuta), calculated from xG: for Zaragoza the average of xG_for 1.47 and opponent xG_against 1.69 yields ~1.58, for Ceuta the average of 1.05 and 1.18 yields ~1.12. A strong argument for Over 1.5 is the seasonal rates: Zaragoza has 71% of matches over 1.5, Ceuta 78%, and both teams recorded Over 0.5 in 94% and 89% of cases, which significantly reduces the likelihood of a goalless outcome. Zaragoza creates more chances (12.41 shots and 4.65 on target on average, conversion 12%) than Ceuta (9.17 shots, 2.78 on target, conversion 10%); additionally, in the last 5 matches the home side’s xG_for was 1.71 versus the visitors’ 1.13. Ceuta concedes on average 2.06 goals per match and has xG_against 1.69, therefore the probability of at least two goals increases; I estimate Over 1.5 at 88% and Over 2.5 at 62%. Over 3.5 is unlikely (≈24%) given the seasonal Over 3.5 shares: 18% for Zaragoza and 33% for Ceuta and the expected combined xG ≈2.70.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Real Zaragoza led at the break in 53% of matches (9 instances) and scores an average of 0.88 goals by halftime versus 0.56 for Ceuta, demonstrating their dominance in the first 45 minutes. Over the full match the home side has an xG of 1.47 and scores on average 1.47 goals with a 65% win rate, while Ceuta posts an xG of 1.05, scores 0.94 goals on average and concedes 2.06 goals per game, so the advantage lies with Zaragoza. Additionally, Zaragoza averages 4.65 shots on target versus 2.78 for Ceuta and has a higher conversion rate (12% vs 10%), which increases the likelihood of maintaining a lead at the break and closing out the match. Given the hosts lead at the break in 53% and win 65%, the HT/FT distribution favors the 1/1 scenario; therefore I assess 1/1 at 42%. The next most likely outcomes are X/1 (16%) and X/X (9%), while turnarounds (1/2: 4%, 2/2: 3%) or Ceuta leading at the break and holding (2/X: 9%) are considered much less probable.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Real Zaragoza | Ceuta | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Ceuta is 25% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Real Zaragoza · 1 pts / match - Ceuta
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ceuta is 35% better for: goals scored per match.
0.89 goals / match - Real Zaragoza · 1.2 goals / match - Ceuta
Real Zaragoza is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.34 goals / match - Real Zaragoza · 1.57 goals / match - Ceuta
Real Zaragoza scores in 66% of matches (23 of 35 matches), while Ceuta keeps a clean sheet in 26% (9 of 35 matches).
Ceuta scores in 71% of matches (25 of 35 matches), while Real Zaragoza keeps a clean sheet in 23% (8 of 35 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Real Zaragoza
Over / Under - Ceuta
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Ceuta is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.03 pts / match - Real Zaragoza · 1.29 pts / match - Ceuta
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Real Zaragoza - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Ceuta - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Real Zaragoza
Ceuta
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Segunda División).
Teams vs league
| Real Zaragoza | Liga | Ceuta | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.23 | 2.60 | ▲ 2.77 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 51% | 55% | • 54% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 34% | 49% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 23% | 27% | • 26% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 69% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | • 74% | 74% | ▼ 60% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Real Zaragoza 0 - 0 - 1 Ceuta. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Real Zaragoza vs Ceuta?
The Segunda División match finished Real Zaragoza 2:2 Ceuta. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Real Zaragoza vs Ceuta?
Real Zaragoza score 0.89 goals per game on average and Ceuta 1.20. The Segunda División average is 2.60 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 51% of Real Zaragoza's matches and 54% of Ceuta's.
What form are Real Zaragoza and Ceuta in?
Over the last 5 games Real Zaragoza have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Ceuta 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Real Zaragoza vs Ceuta?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


