France - Ligue 2Data current as of 11 September 2026

Red Star vs Pau: match statistics

Red Star crest
Red Star
0 : 3half-time 0:0
Pau crest
Pau
135%(2.45)
X35%(3.10)
230%(2.60)

Statistical analysis indicates very even chances for both teams, pointing towards a draw. Red Star occupies a higher position in the table (5th place), but their recent form is poor - only 1 victory in the last 5 matches and 1.2 points per match. Pau, despite being in 10th place, has a better away record with 40% wins and an identical draw rate (40%). A key factor is the high percentage of draws for Red Star at home (44%) and Pau away (40%), suggesting a tendency to split points. Both teams have similar average xG (Red Star 1.38 vs Pau 1.4) and score a similar number of goals at their respective venues. The negative goal difference for both teams (-1 for Red Star in home matches, -2 for Pau away) and comparable conversion rates (10% vs 11%) further strengthen the draw scenario.

Red Star vs Pau: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Red Star played Pau in Ligue 2 (France). The match was played on 6 February 2026. Final score: 0:3.

Current form

Red Star: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Pau: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Red Star scores 1.29 and concedes 0.90 goals per match. Pau scores 1.43 and concedes 1.57. League average: 2.47 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Red Star 43%, Pau 57%. Over 2.5: Red Star 48%, Pau 62%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

Pau has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.24. Red Star: 10.9 shots per match, Pau: 13.6.

Match halves

Red Star: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.67. Pau: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.52.

Goals by minute

Red Star: 0-15 (6 goals). Pau: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligue 2: 2.47 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis indicates very even chances for both teams, pointing towards a draw. Red Star occupies a higher position in the table (5th place), but their recent form is poor - only 1 victory in the last 5 matches and 1.2 points per match. Pau, despite being in 10th place, has a better away record with 40% wins and an identical draw rate (40%). A key factor is the high percentage of draws for Red Star at home (44%) and Pau away (40%), suggesting a tendency to split points. Both teams have similar average xG (Red Star 1.38 vs Pau 1.4) and score a similar number of goals at their respective venues. The negative goal difference for both teams (-1 for Red Star in home matches, -2 for Pau away) and comparable conversion rates (10% vs 11%) further strengthen the draw scenario.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 3
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
Red StarPau
18Shots9
Red StarPau
2Shots on target4
Red StarPau
1.83xG1.02
Red StarPau
8Corners1
Red StarPau
77Dangerous attacks23
Red StarPau
14Fouls9
Red StarPau
3Cards2
Red StarPau

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.29Goals scored / match1.43
Red StarPau
0.9Goals conceded / match1.57
Red StarPau
54%Average possession51%
Red StarPau
3.67Shots on target / match4.14
Red StarPau

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.95Shots per match13.57
Red StarPau
3.67Shots on target4.14
Red StarPau
11.7%Shot conversion10.5%
Red StarPau
54%Possession51%
Red StarPau
1.24xG for1.48
Red StarPau
1.22xG against1.17
Red StarPau

Shooting quality

Red Star: BalancedPau: Balanced
Red StarPau
Accuracy (shots on target)34%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Red Star is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Red Star · 1 pts / match - Pau

Red Star
DLWDD
Season result split
43% W38% D19% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-8-4
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-4-2
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
WWDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.00Opponent xG: 1.35BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Pau
LDLDW
Season result split
38% W33% D29% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-7-6
1.48 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-2
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LDWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.76Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Pau is 11% better for: goals scored per match.

1.29 goals / match - Red Star · 1.43 goals / match - Pau

Red Star is 74% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.9 goals / match - Red Star · 1.57 goals / match - Pau

Red Star scoring profile: very strong

Red Star scores in 76% of matches (16 of 21 matches), while Pau keeps a clean sheet in 29% (6 of 21 matches).

Pau scoring profile: strong

Pau scores in 86% of matches (18 of 21 matches), while Red Star keeps a clean sheet in 48% (10 of 21 matches).

27Goals scored (season)30
Red StarPau
19Goals conceded (season)33
Red StarPau
2.19Average goals in match3
Red StarPau
6Goals scored (last 5)8
Red StarPau
4Goals conceded (last 5)10
Red StarPau

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal86%
Red StarPau
33%2 goals43%
Red StarPau
14%3 goals14%
Red StarPau
5%4 goals0%
Red StarPau

How often they concede at least...

52%1 goal71%
Red StarPau
24%2 goals48%
Red StarPau
14%3 goals24%
Red StarPau
0%4 goals5%
Red StarPau

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time24%
Red StarPau
0%BTTS in both halves5%
Red StarPau
29%Scored in both halves29%
Red StarPau

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
Red StarPau
19%Min. 3 goals without BTTS19%
Red StarPau
40%BTTS - last 580%
Red StarPau

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time90%
Red StarPau
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time57%
Red StarPau
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time33%
Red StarPau

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
Red StarPau
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
Red StarPau
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time5%
Red StarPau

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Red Star - half-time state
29% leading48% draw24% trailing
Pau - half-time state
38% leading19% draw43% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.33Points per match (1st half)1.33
Red StarPau
0.62Goals scored (1st half)0.9
Red StarPau
0.48Goals conceded (1st half)1
Red StarPau
1.1Average goals (1st half)1.9
Red StarPau
62%Clean sheet before half-time48%
Red StarPau
48%No goal before half-time38%
Red StarPau

After half-time (2nd half)

1.52Points per match (2nd half)1.29
Red StarPau
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.52
Red StarPau
0.43Goals conceded (2nd half)0.57
Red StarPau
1.1Average goals (2nd half)1.1
Red StarPau
71%Clean sheet after half-time52%
Red StarPau
48%No goal after half-time48%
Red StarPau

Red Star - second-half results

38% W38% D24% L
28
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding148%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Pau - second-half results

29% W43% D29% L
28
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Red Star - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.20
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal80%40%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Pau - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match1.81.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Red Star
ScoredConceded
6
3
0-15
3
5
16-30
4
2
31-45
3
2
46-60
5
6
61-75
6
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Pau
ScoredConceded
5
7
0-15
6
9
16-30
8
5
31-45
5
3
46-60
1
2
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.60
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+16%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
65%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Red Star

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.37
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
76%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Pau

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.45
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
120%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
123%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.48
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligue 2).

Teams vs league

Red StarLigaPau
Average goals in match 2.192.47 3.00
Both teams scored 43%50% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 48%47% 62%
Clean sheets 48%29% 29%
Goal before half-time 67%67% 90%
Goal after half-time 67%73% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.47
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.28
Home goals / match
1.19
Away goals / match
+8%
Home attack advantage
+7%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PauYellow cardRayan Touzghar
  2. Red StarYellow cardGiovanni Haag
  3. PauSubstitutionOn: Omar SissokoOff: Omar Sadik
  4. PauSubstitutionOn: Kyliane DongOff: Giovani Versini
  5. Red StarSubstitutionOn: Hacene BenaliOff: Pape Meïssa Ba
  6. Red StarYellow cardBradley Danger
  7. PauYellow cardDaylam Meddah
  8. PauSubstitutionOn: Antonin BobichonOff: Rayan Touzghar

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Mikael LesageMatches officiated: 15
5.13Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 227%Home wins53%Draws20%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Red Star 1 - 0 - 0 Pau. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Pau FC
0 : 3
Red Star FC 93

FAQ

What was the result of Red Star vs Pau?

The Ligue 2 match finished Red Star 0:3 Pau. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Red Star vs Pau?

Red Star score 1.29 goals per game on average and Pau 1.43. The Ligue 2 average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Red Star's matches and 57% of Pau's.

What form are Red Star and Pau in?

Over the last 5 games Red Star have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Pau 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Red Star vs Pau?

The statistical background for Red Star vs Pau — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.