Remo Stars vs Niger Tornadoes: match statistics
Remo Stars vs Niger Tornadoes: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Remo Stars played Niger Tornadoes in NPFL (Nigeria). The match was played on 19 April 2026. Final score: 3:0.
Current form
Remo Stars: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Niger Tornadoes: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Remo Stars scores 1.03 and concedes 1.26 goals per match. Niger Tornadoes scores 1.00 and concedes 0.91. League average: 1.93 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Remo Stars 53%, Niger Tornadoes 26%. Over 2.5: Remo Stars 41%, Niger Tornadoes 29%. League level: BTTS 37%, Over 2.5 30%.
xG, shots and style
Niger Tornadoes has higher xG: 1.51 vs 1.33. Remo Stars: 7.5 shots per match, Niger Tornadoes: 8.7.
Match halves
Remo Stars: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.65. Niger Tornadoes: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.65.
Goals by minute
Remo Stars: 76-90+ (11 goals). Niger Tornadoes: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
NPFL: 1.93 goals per match, BTTS 37%, Over 2.5 30%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Remo Stars possess a clear home advantage: they win 65% of matches at home, score an average of 1.47 goals and concede 0.76 per game, with xG 1.52 versus opponents’ xG 0.98. Niger Tornadoes have very poor away figures — only 6% wins, just 0.41 goals scored per match and 1.41 conceded, and 65% of their away games end without them scoring. The difference in chance quality is stark: Remo average 12.33 shots and 5.47 on target per home game, while the visitors record 7.18 shots and 2.18 on target, with conversion rates of 12% versus 5%. In the last 5 matches Remo have scored 8 goals and won 3 games (averaging 2 points per match), whereas Niger have 4 goals and 2 wins in that period (averaging 1.4 points per match). Considering the superiority in possession (56% vs 45%), higher xG and better home defense (41% clean sheets vs 12% for the visitors), I forecast a Remo Stars victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The analysis indicates No BTTS (selection: 'no'), because hosts Remo Stars possess a very strong defensive profile this season: 76% clean sheets and only 0.41 goals conceded per game on average. Remo’s attack produces 1.9 xG and 1.59 average goals per match with 5.2 shots on target and an 11% conversion rate, making them the primary scoring threat (xG 1.9 vs 0.98 for the visitors). Niger Tornadoes have limited offensive output — 0.41 goals this season, xG 0.98, 2.18 shots on target and a 5% conversion, and in their last 5 matches they averaged 0.8 goals with BTTS in only 20% of games. Seasonal BTTS rates are just 24% for the home side and 29% for the away side versus a league level of 36%, and the home advantage in xG (1.9 vs 0.98) and shots (15.0 vs 7.18) further supports that likely only one side will score. Therefore I assess No BTTS at 75% vs 25% for BTTS, treating the short-term home signal of 80% BTTS in the last 5 matches as an outlier relative to season data.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I expect a low-scoring game: expected goals are Remo Stars 1.50 (home xG 1.59 vs Niger’s away conceded 1.41) and Niger Tornadoes 0.41 (away xG 0.41 vs Remo conceded 0.41), totaling 1.91 goals. Remo has 76% clean sheets this season and averages 5.2 shots on target with an 11% conversion rate, while Niger away averages only 2.18 shots on target and a 5% conversion, which significantly limits their scoring potential. Season metrics show only 29% of matches involving both teams finish over 2.5 goals (Under 71%), and a Poisson approximation for a sum of 1.91 yields ~57% for Over 1.5, ~30% for Over 2.5 and ~13% for Over 3.5. Consequently the strongest and most conservative pick is Under 2.5 (under ~70%), since Remo’s high clean sheet rate and Niger’s very poor away finishing outweigh occasional better-form spells from the hosts.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Remo Stars have a clear advantage: they score an average of 1.59 goals per match with xG 1.90 and register 0.65 goals by half-time, whereas Niger Tornadoes manage only 0.41 goals per match, xG 0.98 and just 0.06 goals by half-time. The hosts led at the break in 9 fixtures (53%), while the visitors never led at the break (0%), which, combined with Remo’s overall 65% win rate versus Niger’s 6%, suggests a high probability of the hosts leading at half-time and winning at full-time. Remo averages 5.2 shots on target and 15.0 shots per match, while Niger records 2.18 shots on target and 7.18 shots overall, and the visitors concede on average 1.41 goals per match and 0.82 by half-time, confirming the hosts’ offensive dominance. Additionally, the hosts keep a clean sheet in 76% of matches and 88% at half-time, whereas Niger have only 12% clean sheets, which reduces the visitors’ chances of a turnaround. For these reasons I assign the largest share (39%) to the 1/1 scenario; I also allocate 21% to a draw at full-time when level at half-time (X/X) and 11% to the hosts coming back from a draw at half-time to win (X/1), with the remaining scenarios assigned lower probabilities.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Remo Stars | Niger Tornadoes | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.18 | 0.17 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Remo Stars is 43% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Remo Stars · 1.4 pts / match - Niger Tornadoes
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Niger Tornadoes is 38% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.26 goals / match - Remo Stars · 0.91 goals / match - Niger Tornadoes
Remo Stars scores in 74% of matches (25 of 34 matches), while Niger Tornadoes keeps a clean sheet in 44% (15 of 34 matches).
Niger Tornadoes scores in 59% of matches (20 of 34 matches), while Remo Stars keeps a clean sheet in 21% (7 of 34 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Remo Stars
Over / Under - Niger Tornadoes
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Niger Tornadoes is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.88 pts / match - Remo Stars · 1.21 pts / match - Niger Tornadoes
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Remo Stars - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Niger Tornadoes - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Remo Stars
Niger Tornadoes
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).
Teams vs league
| Remo Stars | Liga | Niger Tornadoes | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.29 | 1.93 | • 1.91 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 53% | 37% | ▼ 26% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 41% | 30% | • 29% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 21% | 38% | ▲ 44% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 62% | 59% | ▲ 62% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 74% | 62% | ▲ 68% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Remo Stars 0 - 0 - 1 Niger Tornadoes. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Remo Stars vs Niger Tornadoes?
The NPFL match finished Remo Stars 3:0 Niger Tornadoes. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Remo Stars vs Niger Tornadoes?
Remo Stars score 1.03 goals per game on average and Niger Tornadoes 1.00. The NPFL average is 1.93 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Remo Stars's matches and 26% of Niger Tornadoes's.
What form are Remo Stars and Niger Tornadoes in?
Over the last 5 games Remo Stars have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Niger Tornadoes 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Remo Stars vs Niger Tornadoes?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


