Nigeria - NPFLData current as of 23 July 2026

Remo Stars vs Plateau United: match statistics

Remo Stars crest
Remo Stars
1 : 2half-time 0:1
Plateau United crest
Plateau United
165%(0.00)
X22%(0.00)
213%(0.00)

Remo Stars show significantly better form at home, achieving a 64% win rate and maintaining a positive goal difference (+7). The hosts average 1.36 goals per home match with only 9% of matches without a goal scored, indicating an effective offense. Plateau United have a disastrous away record – 0% wins, 82% losses, and a goal difference of -14, scoring only 0.45 goals on average per away match. The visitors' last five away matches have been a series of defeats and draws, confirming their helplessness away from home. The clear statistical advantage of the hosts in every aspect of the game makes a Remo Stars victory the most likely outcome of this match.

Remo Stars vs Plateau United: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Remo Stars play Plateau United in NPFL (Nigeria). The match date is 1 February 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Remo Stars: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Plateau United: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Remo Stars scores 1.11 and concedes 1.24 goals per match. Plateau United scores 1.03 and concedes 1.05. League average: 2.02 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Remo Stars 55%, Plateau United 39%. Over 2.5: Remo Stars 45%, Plateau United 39%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. Remo Stars: 7.5 shots per match, Plateau United: 9.2.

Match halves

Remo Stars: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.63. Plateau United: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.61.

Goals by minute

Remo Stars: 76-90+ (12 goals). Plateau United: 46-60 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NPFL: 2.02 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Remo Stars show significantly better form at home, achieving a 64% win rate and maintaining a positive goal difference (+7). The hosts average 1.36 goals per home match with only 9% of matches without a goal scored, indicating an effective offense. Plateau United have a disastrous away record – 0% wins, 82% losses, and a goal difference of -14, scoring only 0.45 goals on average per away match. The visitors' last five away matches have been a series of defeats and draws, confirming their helplessness away from home. The clear statistical advantage of the hosts in every aspect of the game makes a Remo Stars victory the most likely outcome of this match.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
Remo StarsPlateau United
5Shots24
Remo StarsPlateau United
2Shots on target4
Remo StarsPlateau United
0.7xG2.08
Remo StarsPlateau United
3Corners3
Remo StarsPlateau United
32Dangerous attacks42
Remo StarsPlateau United
18Fouls15
Remo StarsPlateau United
2Cards1
Remo StarsPlateau United

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Remo StarsPlateau United
1.11Goals scored / match1.03
Remo StarsPlateau United
1.24Goals conceded / match1.05
Remo StarsPlateau United
39%Average possession40%
Remo StarsPlateau United
3.24Shots on target / match2.68
Remo StarsPlateau United

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.55Shots per match9.16
Remo StarsPlateau United
3.24Shots on target2.68
Remo StarsPlateau United
14.6%Shot conversion11.2%
Remo StarsPlateau United
39%Possession40%
Remo StarsPlateau United
1.37xG for1.38
Remo StarsPlateau United
1.17xG against1.29
Remo StarsPlateau United

Shooting quality

Remo Stars: Counter-attackingPlateau United: Balanced
Remo StarsPlateau United
Accuracy (shots on target)43%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.180.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Remo Stars is 75% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Remo Stars · 0.8 pts / match - Plateau United

Remo Stars
LWLWD
Season result split
37% W13% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-5-19
1.24 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
13-3-3
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Plateau United
LDLLW
Season result split
39% W13% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-5-18
1.32 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-3-15
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LDLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.16Opponent xG: 1.02BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Remo Stars is 8% better for: goals scored per match.

1.11 goals / match - Remo Stars · 1.03 goals / match - Plateau United

Plateau United is 18% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.24 goals / match - Remo Stars · 1.05 goals / match - Plateau United

Remo Stars scoring profile: strong

Remo Stars scores in 76% of matches (29 of 38 matches), while Plateau United keeps a clean sheet in 32% (12 of 38 matches).

Plateau United scoring profile: very strong

Plateau United scores in 66% of matches (25 of 38 matches), while Remo Stars keeps a clean sheet in 21% (8 of 38 matches).

42Goals scored (season)39
Remo StarsPlateau United
47Goals conceded (season)40
Remo StarsPlateau United
2.34Average goals in match2.08
Remo StarsPlateau United
8Goals scored (last 5)2
Remo StarsPlateau United
6Goals conceded (last 5)4
Remo StarsPlateau United

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal66%
Remo StarsPlateau United
29%2 goals24%
Remo StarsPlateau United
5%3 goals8%
Remo StarsPlateau United
0%4 goals5%
Remo StarsPlateau United

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal68%
Remo StarsPlateau United
32%2 goals32%
Remo StarsPlateau United
11%3 goals3%
Remo StarsPlateau United
3%4 goals3%
Remo StarsPlateau United

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

38%
League average

Goal patterns

26%BTTS at half-time21%
Remo StarsPlateau United
0%BTTS in both halves3%
Remo StarsPlateau United
11%Scored in both halves11%
Remo StarsPlateau United

BTTS and goal count

42%Min. 3 goals and BTTS34%
Remo StarsPlateau United
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Remo StarsPlateau United
80%BTTS - last 520%
Remo StarsPlateau United

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

66%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
Remo StarsPlateau United
34%Min. 2 goals before half-time24%
Remo StarsPlateau United
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
Remo StarsPlateau United

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
Remo StarsPlateau United
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time37%
Remo StarsPlateau United
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
Remo StarsPlateau United

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Plateau United is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Remo Stars · 1.21 pts / match - Plateau United

Remo Stars - half-time state
16% leading53% draw32% trailing
Plateau United - half-time state
18% leading66% draw16% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.21
Remo StarsPlateau United
0.47Goals scored (1st half)0.42
Remo StarsPlateau United
0.63Goals conceded (1st half)0.37
Remo StarsPlateau United
1.11Average goals (1st half)0.79
Remo StarsPlateau United
47%Clean sheet before half-time63%
Remo StarsPlateau United
61%No goal before half-time66%
Remo StarsPlateau United

After half-time (2nd half)

1.39Points per match (2nd half)1.21
Remo StarsPlateau United
0.63Goals scored (2nd half)0.61
Remo StarsPlateau United
0.61Goals conceded (2nd half)0.68
Remo StarsPlateau United
1.24Average goals (2nd half)1.29
Remo StarsPlateau United
55%Clean sheet after half-time47%
Remo StarsPlateau United
53%No goal after half-time58%
Remo StarsPlateau United

Remo Stars - second-half results

37% W29% R34% P
38
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
53
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding231%

Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Plateau United - second-half results

29% W34% R37% P
46
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding217%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Remo Stars - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.20
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Plateau United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Remo Stars
ScoredConceded
6
9
0-15
1
7
16-30
11
8
31-45
3
6
46-60
9
5
61-75
12
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Plateau United
ScoredConceded
6
6
0-15
5
2
16-30
5
6
31-45
9
9
46-60
5
8
61-75
9
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.21
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
110%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-10%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Remo Stars

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
77%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
214%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Plateau United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
178%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
73%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.52
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).

Teams vs league

Remo StarsLigaPlateau United
Average goals in match 2.342.02 2.08
Both teams scored 55%38% 39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 45%34% 39%
Clean sheets 21%37% 32%
Goal before half-time 66%61% 50%
Goal after half-time 76%64% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.02
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
37%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
0.58
Away goals / match
+148%
Home attack advantage
+60%
Home defence advantage
+52%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Remo Stars 0 - 0 - 1 Plateau United. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Plateau United
2 : 0
Remo Stars

FAQ

What was the result of Remo Stars vs Plateau United?

The NPFL match finished Remo Stars 1:2 Plateau United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Remo Stars vs Plateau United?

Remo Stars score 1.11 goals per game on average and Plateau United 1.03. The NPFL average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Remo Stars's matches and 39% of Plateau United's.

What form are Remo Stars and Plateau United in?

Over the last 5 games Remo Stars have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Plateau United 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Remo Stars vs Plateau United?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Remo Stars vs Plateau United: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.