Remo vs Cruzeiro: match statistics
Remo vs Cruzeiro: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Remo play Cruzeiro in Serie A (Brazil). The match date is 25 April 2026 at 23:30. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Remo: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Cruzeiro: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Remo scores 1.17 and concedes 1.61 goals per match. Cruzeiro scores 1.33 and concedes 1.56. League average: 2.65 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Remo 56%, Cruzeiro 67%. Over 2.5: Remo 44%, Cruzeiro 61%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
Cruzeiro has higher xG: 1.55 vs 1.30. Remo: 12.2 shots per match, Cruzeiro: 14.2.
Match halves
Remo: half-time lead 6%, second-half goals 0.61. Cruzeiro: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
Remo: 76-90+ (7 goals). Cruzeiro: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Serie A: 2.65 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Match description
Remo holds a clear home advantage — averaging 1.6 goals per match, 5.8 shots on target and a 12% conversion rate, whereas Cruzeiro away averages only 0.8 goals with 4.2 shots on target and a 6% conversion. Additionally, Cruzeiro concedes 2.8 goals per away match and has a negative away goal difference (-10), while Remo concedes 1.4 at home and has a home goal difference of +1, giving the hosts a defensive edge. xG corroborates a slight advantage for Remo: average xG for the hosts is 1.45 versus 1.35 for Cruzeiro, and xG against both teams is 1.53, so the expected margin is small but in Remo’s favor. It should be noted, however, that Remo often draws at home (60% draws) and have yet to keep a clean sheet (0%), while Cruzeiro scored 8 goals in their last 5 matches (Remo 6), indicating offensive improvement from the visitors; despite that, the visitors have 0% away wins and 80% away losses, which substantially reduces their prospects. Considering 1.6 vs 0.8 goals scored, 1.4 vs 2.8 goals conceded and better efficiency (5.8 vs 4.2 shots on target and 12% vs 6% conversion), I give Remo the higher probability, but due to the high home draw rate I also assign a significant probability to a draw.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Remo | Cruzeiro | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Remo is 25% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Remo · 1.6 pts / match - Cruzeiro
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Cruzeiro is 14% better for: goals scored per match.
1.17 goals / match - Remo · 1.33 goals / match - Cruzeiro
Remo scores in 61% of matches (11 of 18 matches), while Cruzeiro keeps a clean sheet in 22% (4 of 18 matches).
Cruzeiro scores in 83% of matches (15 of 18 matches), while Remo keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 18 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Remo
Over / Under — Cruzeiro
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Cruzeiro is 64% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.78 pts / match - Remo · 1.28 pts / match - Cruzeiro
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Remo - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 6% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Cruzeiro - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Remo
Cruzeiro
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie A).
Teams vs league
| Remo | Liga | Cruzeiro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.78 | 2.65 | ▲ 2.89 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 56% | 59% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 50% | ▲ 61% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 11% | 23% | • 22% |
| Goal before half-time | • 78% | 77% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 72% | 78% | • 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Remo vs Cruzeiro?
The Serie A match finished Remo 0:1 Cruzeiro. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Remo vs Cruzeiro?
Remo score 1.17 goals per game on average and Cruzeiro 1.33. The Serie A average is 2.65 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Remo's matches and 67% of Cruzeiro's.
What form are Remo and Cruzeiro in?
Over the last 5 games Remo have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Cruzeiro 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Remo vs Cruzeiro?
The statistical background for Remo vs Cruzeiro — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.