Remo vs Cruzeiro: match statistics
Remo vs Cruzeiro: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Remo played Cruzeiro in Serie A (Brazil). The match was played on 25 April 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Remo: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Cruzeiro: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Remo scores 1.08 and concedes 1.83 goals per match. Cruzeiro scores 1.33 and concedes 1.75. League average: 2.62 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Remo 50%, Cruzeiro 58%. Over 2.5: Remo 42%, Cruzeiro 67%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 48%.
xG, shots and style
Cruzeiro has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.30. Remo: 12.4 shots per match, Cruzeiro: 13.9.
Match halves
Remo: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 0.50. Cruzeiro: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
Remo: 31-45+ (4 goals). Cruzeiro: 46-60 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Serie A: 2.62 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 48%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Remo holds a clear home advantage — averaging 1.6 goals per match, 5.8 shots on target and a 12% conversion rate, whereas Cruzeiro away averages only 0.8 goals with 4.2 shots on target and a 6% conversion. Additionally, Cruzeiro concedes 2.8 goals per away match and has a negative away goal difference (-10), while Remo concedes 1.4 at home and has a home goal difference of +1, giving the hosts a defensive edge. xG corroborates a slight advantage for Remo: average xG for the hosts is 1.45 versus 1.35 for Cruzeiro, and xG against both teams is 1.53, so the expected margin is small but in Remo’s favor. It should be noted, however, that Remo often draws at home (60% draws) and have yet to keep a clean sheet (0%), while Cruzeiro scored 8 goals in their last 5 matches (Remo 6), indicating offensive improvement from the visitors; despite that, the visitors have 0% away wins and 80% away losses, which substantially reduces their prospects. Considering 1.6 vs 0.8 goals scored, 1.4 vs 2.8 goals conceded and better efficiency (5.8 vs 4.2 shots on target and 12% vs 6% conversion), I give Remo the higher probability, but due to the high home draw rate I also assign a significant probability to a draw.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams show clear BTTS tendencies: Remo 57% season matches with both teams scoring, Cruzeiro 60%, and the league average 56%, which gives a baseline forecast of "yes". Cruzeiro has 0% clean sheets this season and concedes on average 2.8 goals away, and in the last 5 matches scored on average 1.6 goals (8 goals) with xG_for 1.58, confirming a real ability to score despite a weak defense. Remo at home scores on average 1.71 goals and has xG_for 1.56, while in the last 5 matches conceded on average 1.6 goals (8 conceded), showing they can also allow a goal. Shot statistics support an exchange of goals: Remo 5.0 shots on target vs Cruzeiro 4.2 and conversion 12% vs 6%, with a league average of 2.62 goals per game and 60% BTTS in the last 5 meetings of both teams. Therefore I pick "yes" with a 72% probability (no 28%), because Cruzeiro's 0% clean sheets, season 57%/60% BTTS and recent xG and goals (1.56, 1.58 and 8 goals in 5 matches) argue strongly for both teams scoring.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate expected goals at 1.55 for Remo and 1.15 for Cruzeiro (total 2.70), calculated as the average of home attack xG (1.56) and away defense xG (1.53) and away attack xG (1.35) and home defense xG (0.94). Season metrics show a strong trend towards matches with at least 2 goals: Over 1.5 occurred in 86% of Remo’s games and 100% of Cruzeiro’s games, while the 2.5 line was exceeded in 57% of Remo’s matches and 80% of Cruzeiro’s. A Poisson model with total lambda = 2.70 gives about a 75% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), about 51% for at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) and about 29% for at least 4 goals (Over 3.5). Remo averages 14.71 shots and 5.0 on target with a 12% conversion, Cruzeiro averages 12.8 shots and 4.2 on target with a 6% conversion — this indicates the home side is more efficient at turning chances into goals. Considering the expected goals (2.70), high seasonal Over 1.5 rates (86% vs 100%) and the Poisson result (75% Over 1.5), the strongest signal is to play Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Remo is the favorite according to seasonal metrics: they score an average of 1.71 goals per match versus 0.8 for Cruzeiro, have a 43% win rate compared to 0% for the visitors and collect an average of 1.71 points per match versus 0.2 for Cruzeiro; xG is 1.56 for Remo against 1.35 for Cruzeiro. In the first half the home side is stronger – Remo averages 1.0 goal by half-time and led at the break in 3 matches (43%), whereas Cruzeiro averages only 0.2 goals by half-time and concedes 1.2 goals before the break; the hosts also record 71% clean sheets at half-time. Remo attempts more shots (14.71 vs 12.8) and has better conversion (12% vs 6%), while Cruzeiro concedes an average of 1.6 goals after the break, which increases the chance of the hosts securing the win in the second half. For these reasons the most likely and strongest signal is Remo leading at half-time and winning the match (1/1), while allowing for the half-time draw scenario which also frequently finishes with a home victory (x/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Remo | Cruzeiro | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.10 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Cruzeiro is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Remo · 2 pts / match - Cruzeiro
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Cruzeiro is 23% better for: goals scored per match.
1.08 goals / match - Remo · 1.33 goals / match - Cruzeiro
Cruzeiro is 5% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.83 goals / match - Remo · 1.75 goals / match - Cruzeiro
Remo scores in 50% of matches (6 of 12 matches), while Cruzeiro keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 matches).
Cruzeiro scores in 75% of matches (9 of 12 matches), while Remo keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 12 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Remo
Over / Under - Cruzeiro
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Cruzeiro is 51% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.83 pts / match - Remo · 1.25 pts / match - Cruzeiro
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Remo - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 8%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Cruzeiro - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Remo
Cruzeiro
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie A).
Teams vs league
| Remo | Liga | Cruzeiro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.92 | 2.62 | ▲ 3.08 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 56% | ▲ 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 42% | 48% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 8% | 24% | • 25% |
| Goal before half-time | • 75% | 74% | • 75% |
| Goal after half-time | • 75% | 76% | ▲ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Remo vs Cruzeiro?
The Serie A match finished Remo 0:1 Cruzeiro. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Remo vs Cruzeiro?
Remo score 1.08 goals per game on average and Cruzeiro 1.33. The Serie A average is 2.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Remo's matches and 58% of Cruzeiro's.
What form are Remo and Cruzeiro in?
Over the last 5 games Remo have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Cruzeiro 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Remo vs Cruzeiro?
The statistical background for Remo vs Cruzeiro — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


