Brazil - Serie AEstádio Estadual Jornalista Edgar Augusto ProençaData current as of 17 October 2026

Remo vs Flamengo: match statistics

Remo crest
Remo
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Flamengo crest
Flamengo

Remo vs Flamengo: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Remo played Flamengo in Serie A (Brazil). The match was played on 6 September 2026. Venue: Estádio Estadual Jornalista Edgar Augusto Proença. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Remo: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Flamengo: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Remo scores 1.20 and concedes 1.68 goals per match. Flamengo scores 2.00 and concedes 0.84. League average: 2.64 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Remo 60%, Flamengo 48%. Over 2.5: Remo 52%, Flamengo 60%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Flamengo has higher xG: 1.66 vs 1.33. Remo: 12.6 shots per match, Flamengo: 15.0.

Match halves

Remo: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.64. Flamengo: half-time lead 60%, second-half goals 1.12.

Goals by minute

Remo: 76-90+ (8 goals). Flamengo: 0-15 (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie A: 2.64 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Flamengo sit 2nd in the table, while Remo are only 19th, and the visitors’ season record stands at 14 wins and just 4 defeats, compared with the hosts’ 5 victories and 12 losses. Recent form also clearly favours Flamengo: they have collected 10 points and scored 12 goals in their last five matches, whereas Remo have failed to win any of their last five, earning just 2 points and scoring 6 goals. Away from home, Flamengo average 2.00 goals per match with a 16% shot conversion rate, while Remo concede an average of 1.33 goals at home. Although the hosts have a similar home xG average of 1.48 to Flamengo’s 1.46 away from home, their poor current form and just 17% of home matches without conceding increase the visitors’ chances of capitalising on their quality advantage. Remo draw 42% of their home matches, so a draw remains a realistic alternative, but Flamengo’s more consistent defence, conceding an average of 1.00 goal away from home, points to an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest argument for BTTS - Yes is current form: in their last 5 matches, both teams recorded this outcome in as many as 80% of games. During this period, Remo conceded an average of 1.8 goals per match, while Flamengo scored 2.4 goals, supported by the visitors’ high xG of 1.91. Flamengo also allowed opponents chances worth an average xG of 1.59, while Remo created opportunities valued at 1.47 xG, giving the hosts a realistic route to goal. Remo’s seasonal BTTS rate is low at 36%, supported by a 55% clean-sheet rate, but Flamengo kept a clean sheet in only 31% of matches. Both teams rarely finish a game without scoring, doing so in just 9% and 8% of matches respectively, which makes goals at both ends more likely.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The Over 1.5 goals line is strongly supported by the season data: Remo matches featured at least 2 goals in 100% of games, while the figure for Flamengo was 92%. Both teams regularly create chances, with average xG of 1.93 for Remo and 1.46 for Flamengo, indicating a combined potential of close to 2.85 goals. The last five matches further support a goal-heavy game: Flamengo scored an average of 2.4 goals, while the teams’ matches finished Over 2.5 goals in 60% and 80% of cases, respectively. Remo conceded 1.8 goals per game during this period, so despite the hosts’ solid season-long defensive record, at least two goals are expected.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal points to Flamengo leading at the break and holding on for the win, as the visitors were ahead at half-time in 80% of their last five matches, compared with just 20% for Remo. Flamengo have not conceded a single goal before half-time during this run, while Remo have scored just 0.4 goals and conceded 0.6 in the first halves. Full-match form also clearly favours the visitors: Flamengo won 60% of their last five matches, scoring an average of 2.4 goals and conceding 1.0, whereas Remo failed to win any of them, scoring 1.2 goals and allowing opponents 1.8. Flamengo remain dangerous in the second halves, averaging 1.6 goals recently, while Remo concede 1.2 goals per match during this period. Remo’s home advantage and their seasonal 64% win rate reduce confidence in the prediction, but current form and Flamengo’s superiority in the early stages of matches provide the strongest support for the 2/2 HT/FT outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

36Possession (%)64
RemoFlamengo
7Shots21
RemoFlamengo
1Shots on target5
RemoFlamengo
0.86xG2.23
RemoFlamengo
7Corners9
RemoFlamengo
48Dangerous attacks75
RemoFlamengo
9Fouls13
RemoFlamengo
4Cards2
RemoFlamengo

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.2Goals scored / match2
RemoFlamengo
1.68Goals conceded / match0.84
RemoFlamengo
43%Average possession56%
RemoFlamengo
3.88Shots on target / match5.08
RemoFlamengo

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.6Shots per match15
RemoFlamengo
3.88Shots on target5.08
RemoFlamengo
9.5%Shot conversion13.3%
RemoFlamengo
43%Possession56%
RemoFlamengo
1.33xG for1.66
RemoFlamengo
1.57xG against1.34
RemoFlamengo

Shooting quality

Remo: BalancedFlamengo: Dominant
RemoFlamengo
Accuracy (shots on target)31%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Flamengo is 500% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - Remo · 2.4 pts / match - Flamengo

Remo
LDDLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
20% W32% D48% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-8-12
0.92 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-5-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
Flamengo
WWLWW
Season result split
60% W24% D16% L
Season (W-D-L)
15-6-4
2.04 pts / match · goal difference +29
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-3-3
Last 5 away
2-2-1
DWDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.76Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Flamengo is 67% better for: goals scored per match.

1.2 goals / match - Remo · 2 goals / match - Flamengo

Flamengo is 100% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.68 goals / match - Remo · 0.84 goals / match - Flamengo

Remo scoring profile: mixed

Remo scores in 68% of matches (17 of 25 matches), while Flamengo keeps a clean sheet in 44% (11 of 25 matches).

Flamengo scoring profile: very strong

Flamengo scores in 92% of matches (23 of 25 matches), while Remo keeps a clean sheet in 12% (3 of 25 matches).

30Goals scored (season)50
RemoFlamengo
42Goals conceded (season)21
RemoFlamengo
2.88Average goals in match2.84
RemoFlamengo
7Goals scored (last 5)13
RemoFlamengo
10Goals conceded (last 5)3
RemoFlamengo

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal92%
RemoFlamengo
36%2 goals60%
RemoFlamengo
12%3 goals32%
RemoFlamengo
4%4 goals12%
RemoFlamengo

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal56%
RemoFlamengo
56%2 goals20%
RemoFlamengo
20%3 goals8%
RemoFlamengo
4%4 goals0%
RemoFlamengo

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

36%BTTS at half-time4%
RemoFlamengo
8%BTTS in both halves0%
RemoFlamengo
20%Scored in both halves48%
RemoFlamengo

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS28%
RemoFlamengo
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS32%
RemoFlamengo
100%BTTS - last 540%
RemoFlamengo

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time84%
RemoFlamengo
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time28%
RemoFlamengo
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
RemoFlamengo

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time92%
RemoFlamengo
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time48%
RemoFlamengo
16%Min. 3 goals after half-time16%
RemoFlamengo

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Flamengo is 127% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.88 pts / match - Remo · 2 pts / match - Flamengo

Remo - half-time state
12% leading52% draw36% trailing
Flamengo - half-time state
60% leading20% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.88Points per match (1st half)2
RemoFlamengo
0.56Goals scored (1st half)0.88
RemoFlamengo
0.84Goals conceded (1st half)0.28
RemoFlamengo
1.4Average goals (1st half)1.16
RemoFlamengo
32%Clean sheet before half-time76%
RemoFlamengo
52%No goal before half-time36%
RemoFlamengo

After half-time (2nd half)

1.16Points per match (2nd half)1.96
RemoFlamengo
0.64Goals scored (2nd half)1.12
RemoFlamengo
0.84Goals conceded (2nd half)0.56
RemoFlamengo
1.48Average goals (2nd half)1.68
RemoFlamengo
48%Clean sheet after half-time60%
RemoFlamengo
60%No goal after half-time24%
RemoFlamengo

Remo - second-half results

28% W32% D40% L
22
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.88
PPG before half-time
Lead holding167%

Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Flamengo - second-half results

60% W16% D24% L
50
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
+15
Goal difference (1st half)
49
Second-half points
+14
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 60% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Remo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Flamengo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.002.00
Goals scored / match1.21.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal0%40%
Goal difference+6+4
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Remo
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
2
9
16-30
7
9
31-45
4
10
46-60
4
3
61-75
8
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Flamengo
ScoredConceded
11
1
0-15
5
3
16-30
6
3
31-45
11
5
46-60
7
3
61-75
10
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.86
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+5%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
63%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Remo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
147%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.52
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Flamengo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.84
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
175%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
56%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.36
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie A).

Teams vs league

RemoLigaFlamengo
Average goals in match▲ 2.882.64▲ 2.84
Both teams scored▲ 60%58%▼ 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 52%50%▲ 60%
Clean sheets▼ 12%24%▲ 44%
Goal before half-time▲ 80%74%▲ 84%
Goal after half-time▼ 76%78%▲ 92%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.64
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.50
Home goals / match
1.14
Away goals / match
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+22%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Remo 0 - 0 - 1 Flamengo. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Remo vs Flamengo?

The Serie A match finished Remo 0:1 Flamengo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Remo vs Flamengo?

Remo score 1.20 goals per game on average and Flamengo 2.00. The Serie A average is 2.64 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Remo's matches and 48% of Flamengo's.

What form are Remo and Flamengo in?

Over the last 5 games Remo have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Flamengo 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Remo vs Flamengo?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.