Brazil - Serie AData current as of 23 July 2026

Remo vs Fluminense: match statistics

Remo crest
Remo
0 : 2half-time 0:1
Fluminense crest
Fluminense
125%(3.60)
X30%(3.50)
245%(1.75)

Fluminense appears to be the favorite in this matchup despite playing away. The visitors sit much higher in the table (6th place compared to Remo's 15th) and show better form in their last five matches (1.6 points per game versus the hosts' 1.2). Remo has not won a single home game this season, recording 100% draws in home fixtures, indicating difficulties in breaking down opponents at their own stadium. Fluminense dominates in terms of ball possession (62% vs 39%), which could translate into control over the match. Although Fluminense has yet to win on the road this season, their goal difference (+1 overall vs Remo's -2) and better efficiency in recent matches work in their favor. Given Remo's tendency to draw at home and the visitors' improving form, a Fluminense triumph is the most likely outcome, though a draw also remains a realistic option.

Remo vs Fluminense: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Remo play Fluminense in Serie A (Brazil). The match date is 12 March 2026 at 23:00. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Remo: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Fluminense: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Remo scores 1.17 and concedes 1.61 goals per match. Fluminense scores 1.53 and concedes 1.26. League average: 2.65 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Remo 56%, Fluminense 74%. Over 2.5: Remo 44%, Fluminense 53%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Fluminense has higher xG: 1.71 vs 1.30. Remo: 12.2 shots per match, Fluminense: 15.2.

Match halves

Remo: half-time lead 6%, second-half goals 0.61. Fluminense: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 0.79.

Goals by minute

Remo: 76-90+ (7 goals). Fluminense: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie A: 2.65 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

Fluminense appears to be the favorite in this matchup despite playing away. The visitors sit much higher in the table (6th place compared to Remo's 15th) and show better form in their last five matches (1.6 points per game versus the hosts' 1.2). Remo has not won a single home game this season, recording 100% draws in home fixtures, indicating difficulties in breaking down opponents at their own stadium. Fluminense dominates in terms of ball possession (62% vs 39%), which could translate into control over the match. Although Fluminense has yet to win on the road this season, their goal difference (+1 overall vs Remo's -2) and better efficiency in recent matches work in their favor. Given Remo's tendency to draw at home and the visitors' improving form, a Fluminense triumph is the most likely outcome, though a draw also remains a realistic option.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

33Possession (%)67
RemoFluminense
10Shots15
RemoFluminense
3Shots on target7
RemoFluminense
1.12xG1.76
RemoFluminense
6Corners4
RemoFluminense
38Dangerous attacks44
RemoFluminense
7Fouls14
RemoFluminense
2Cards1
RemoFluminense

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.17Goals scored / match1.53
RemoFluminense
1.61Goals conceded / match1.26
RemoFluminense
43%Average possession60%
RemoFluminense
3.94Shots on target / match5.63
RemoFluminense

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.17Shots per match15.21
RemoFluminense
3.94Shots on target5.63
RemoFluminense
9.6%Shot conversion10%
RemoFluminense
43%Possession60%
RemoFluminense
1.3xG for1.71
RemoFluminense
1.6xG against1.37
RemoFluminense

Shooting quality

Remo: BalancedFluminense: Dominant
RemoFluminense
Accuracy (shots on target)32%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Remo is 67% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Remo · 1.2 pts / match - Fluminense

Remo
WDWLW
Season result split
22% W33% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-6-8
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-4-3
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DLDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.76BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Fluminense
DWLDD
Season result split
47% W26% R26% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-5-5
1.68 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DWLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Fluminense is 31% better for: goals scored per match.

1.17 goals / match - Remo · 1.53 goals / match - Fluminense

Fluminense is 28% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.61 goals / match - Remo · 1.26 goals / match - Fluminense

Remo scoring profile: very strong

Remo scores in 61% of matches (11 of 18 matches), while Fluminense keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 matches).

Fluminense scoring profile: very strong

Fluminense scores in 89% of matches (17 of 19 matches), while Remo keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 18 matches).

21Goals scored (season)29
RemoFluminense
29Goals conceded (season)24
RemoFluminense
2.78Average goals in match2.79
RemoFluminense
8Goals scored (last 5)6
RemoFluminense
6Goals conceded (last 5)6
RemoFluminense

How often they score at least...

61%1 goal89%
RemoFluminense
33%2 goals47%
RemoFluminense
17%3 goals16%
RemoFluminense
6%4 goals0%
RemoFluminense

How often they concede at least...

89%1 goal84%
RemoFluminense
50%2 goals37%
RemoFluminense
17%3 goals5%
RemoFluminense
6%4 goals0%
RemoFluminense

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

39%BTTS at half-time16%
RemoFluminense
11%BTTS in both halves11%
RemoFluminense
17%Scored in both halves32%
RemoFluminense

BTTS and goal count

39%Min. 3 goals and BTTS53%
RemoFluminense
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
RemoFluminense
80%BTTS - last 580%
RemoFluminense

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

78%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
RemoFluminense
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
RemoFluminense
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
RemoFluminense

2nd half

72%Min. 1 goal after half-time84%
RemoFluminense
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
RemoFluminense
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time26%
RemoFluminense

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Fluminense is 115% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.78 pts / match - Remo · 1.68 pts / match - Fluminense

Remo - half-time state
6% leading61% draw33% trailing
Fluminense - half-time state
47% leading26% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.78Points per match (1st half)1.68
RemoFluminense
0.56Goals scored (1st half)0.74
RemoFluminense
0.78Goals conceded (1st half)0.42
RemoFluminense
1.33Average goals (1st half)1.16
RemoFluminense
28%Clean sheet before half-time63%
RemoFluminense
56%No goal before half-time42%
RemoFluminense

After half-time (2nd half)

1.06Points per match (2nd half)1.32
RemoFluminense
0.61Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
RemoFluminense
0.83Goals conceded (2nd half)0.84
RemoFluminense
1.44Average goals (2nd half)1.63
RemoFluminense
44%Clean sheet after half-time32%
RemoFluminense
67%No goal after half-time37%
RemoFluminense

Remo - second-half results

22% W39% R39% P
14
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.78
PPG before half-time
Lead holding367%

Leads at half-time in 6% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Fluminense - second-half results

32% W37% R32% P
32
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.68
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Remo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.00
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 3
Fluminense - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.80
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.21.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Remo
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
2
7
16-30
4
5
31-45
3
8
46-60
1
2
61-75
7
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Fluminense
ScoredConceded
2
5
0-15
6
1
16-30
6
2
31-45
6
4
46-60
1
6
61-75
8
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.79
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Remo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
146%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Fluminense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
139%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.48
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie A).

Teams vs league

RemoLigaFluminense
Average goals in match 2.782.65 2.79
Both teams scored 56%59% 74%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 44%50% 53%
Clean sheets 11%23% 16%
Goal before half-time 78%77% 79%
Goal after half-time 72%78% 84%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.65
Average goals per match
59%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.55
Home goals / match
1.10
Away goals / match
+41%
Home attack advantage
+29%
Home defence advantage
+25%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Remo vs Fluminense?

The Serie A match finished Remo 0:2 Fluminense. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Remo vs Fluminense?

Remo score 1.17 goals per game on average and Fluminense 1.53. The Serie A average is 2.65 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Remo's matches and 74% of Fluminense's.

What form are Remo and Fluminense in?

Over the last 5 games Remo have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Fluminense 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Remo vs Fluminense?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Remo vs Fluminense: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.