Resistencia vs Sportivo Carapeguá: match statistics
Resistencia vs Sportivo Carapeguá: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Resistencia played Sportivo Carapeguá in Division Intermedia (Paraguay). The match was played on 10 July 2026. Venue: Estadio Tomás Beggan Correa. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Resistencia: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Sportivo Carapeguá: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Resistencia scores 1.15 and concedes 1.31 goals per match. Sportivo Carapeguá scores 1.15 and concedes 1.92. League average: 2.62 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Resistencia 54%, Sportivo Carapeguá 54%. Over 2.5: Resistencia 46%, Sportivo Carapeguá 46%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots and style
Resistencia has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.17. Resistencia: 9.8 shots per match, Sportivo Carapeguá: 8.5.
Match halves
Resistencia: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.62. Sportivo Carapeguá: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.69.
Goals by minute
Resistencia: 31-45+ (4 goals). Sportivo Carapeguá: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Division Intermedia: 2.62 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Resistencia holds a clear defensive and form advantage: at home they score 1.43 goals and concede 1.29 per match on average, while Sportivo away scores 1.29 and concedes as many as 2.57. This is confirmed by xG: average home xG for the hosts is 1.57 versus 1.40 for Sportivo on the road, and average xG against for the visitors is 1.81, indicating the guests allow more high-quality chances. In the last 5 matches Resistencia have scored 7 goals and won 2 of 5, averaging 1.4 points per game, whereas Sportivo have 6 goals and only 1 win in five matches with an average of 1.0 point per game, the visitors having conceded 10 goals in those five fixtures. The hosts register more shots on target (4 vs 3.57) and have 43% clean sheets at home compared to 14% for Sportivo away; Resistencia’s home loss rate is 29% versus a 57% away loss rate for the visitors. Given the lower average concessions (1.29 vs 2.57), higher home xG and better recent form, I favor a home victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
BTTS looks more likely: both teams have seasonal BTTS rates of 50% (Resistencia) and 57% (Sportivo Carapeguá), with the league average BTTS at 55%. In the last 5 matches both sides recorded BTTS at 60%, with goals per game averages of 1.4 (Resistencia) and 1.2 (Sportivo) and average goals conceded of 1.6 and 2.0 respectively, indicating both regularly score and concede. Clean sheet analysis shows Resistencia keep a clean sheet in 33% of matches (opponent scored in 67%), and Sportivo only 14% (opponent scored in 86%); a simple multiplication gives approximately 0.67*0.86≈57.6% chance that both teams will score. Offensive metrics further support this view: in the last 5 matches both teams have xG 1.4, while Sportivo averages 10.29 shots and 3.57 shots on target versus Resistencia’s 6.5 shots and 2.83 shots on target, increasing the likelihood of goals from both sides. Based on this I pick BTTS - Yes with a probability of 62% vs 38%, because the set of seasonal and recent indicators (BTTS 50/57, last 5 matches 60/60, high goals conceded 2.57 for Sportivo and low clean sheets) favors both teams to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG (Resistencia xG 0.91 vs xG conceded to Sportivo 1.81; Sportivo xG 1.40 vs xG conceded to Resistencia 0.81) I estimate 1.36 goals for the home side and 1.11 for the visitors (total 2.47). That total implies roughly a 71% probability of at least 2 goals, consistent with season Over1.5 rates: 67% for Resistencia and 71% for Sportivo. The chance of Over 2.5 is about 45%, with Sportivo conceding an average of 2.57 goals per game and a season Over2.5 rate of 57%, increasing the risk of goals from their side. Over 3.5 remains unlikely (~24%) due to a low 17% frequency of such results for the home team despite 57% for the visitors, so I recommend backing Over 1.5 as the strongest signal. Additionally, Sportivo averages 10.29 shots (3.57 on target) versus Resistencia 6.5 (2.83 on target), and BTTS is 50%/57%, which supports the Over 1.5 selection.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Resistencia led at the break in 3 of 6 matches (50%) and scores an average of 0.67 goals before half-time, while Sportivo concedes an average of 1.43 goals by the break; the home side also averages 1.67 points by half-time versus 0.29 for the visitors, which strongly indicates a Resistencia lead at the break. Over the season Resistencia records 1.67 points per home match versus 0.71 for Sportivo and holds a 50% win rate compared to the visitors’ 14%, so the home team is the favorite to win. Sportivo, however, often scores after the break — averaging 2.14 goals in the second half and featuring in 86% of matches with at least one goal after half-time — which increases the risk of a turnaround. Nevertheless the visitors concede an average of 2.57 goals across the season and have an xG against of 1.81, so the most reliable scenario is Resistencia leading at half-time and winning the match (1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Resistencia | Sportivo Carapeguá | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Resistencia is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Resistencia · 1 pts / match - Sportivo Carapeguá
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Resistencia is 47% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.31 goals / match - Resistencia · 1.92 goals / match - Sportivo Carapeguá
Resistencia scores in 77% of matches (10 of 13 matches), while Sportivo Carapeguá keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).
Sportivo Carapeguá scores in 77% of matches (10 of 13 matches), while Resistencia keeps a clean sheet in 38% (5 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Resistencia
Over / Under - Sportivo Carapeguá
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Resistencia is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.38 pts / match - Resistencia · 0.92 pts / match - Sportivo Carapeguá
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Resistencia - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Sportivo Carapeguá - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Resistencia
Sportivo Carapeguá
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Division Intermedia).
Teams vs league
| Resistencia | Liga | Sportivo Carapeguá | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.46 | 2.62 | ▲ 3.08 |
| Both teams scored | • 54% | 55% | • 54% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 46% | 44% | ▲ 46% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 38% | 26% | ▼ 23% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 69% | 64% | ▲ 85% |
| Goal after half-time | • 77% | 78% | ▼ 62% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Resistencia 0 - 1 - 1 Sportivo Carapeguá. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Resistencia vs Sportivo Carapeguá?
The Division Intermedia match finished Resistencia 1:1 Sportivo Carapeguá. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Resistencia and Sportivo Carapeguá?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Resistencia won 0, Sportivo Carapeguá won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Resistencia vs Sportivo Carapeguá?
Resistencia score 1.15 goals per game on average and Sportivo Carapeguá 1.15. The Division Intermedia average is 2.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Resistencia's matches and 54% of Sportivo Carapeguá's.
What form are Resistencia and Sportivo Carapeguá in?
Over the last 5 games Resistencia have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Sportivo Carapeguá 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Resistencia vs Sportivo Carapeguá?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Resistencia vs Sportivo Carapeguá: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


