Rēzekne / BJSS vs Mārupe: match statistics
Rēzekne / BJSS vs Mārupe: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Rēzekne / BJSS played Mārupe in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match was played on 25 July 2026. Venue: OC Rēzekne Mākslīgais Laukums. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Rēzekne / BJSS: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Mārupe: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Rēzekne / BJSS scores 0.77 and concedes 2.85 goals per match. Mārupe scores 1.69 and concedes 1.46. League average: 3.45 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Rēzekne / BJSS 54%, Mārupe 46%. Over 2.5: Rēzekne / BJSS 69%, Mārupe 77%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 67%.
xG, shots and style
Mārupe has higher xG: 1.46 vs 0.74. Rēzekne / BJSS: 3.2 shots per match, Mārupe: 9.5.
Match halves
Rēzekne / BJSS: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 0.46. Mārupe: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 1.31.
Goals by minute
Rēzekne / BJSS: 46-60 (3 goals). Mārupe: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1. Liga: 3.45 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 67%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Mārupe has a clear advantage this season: they have scored 22 goals and sit 6th, while Rēzekne / BJSS have only 10 goals and are 14th. The visitors’ defense is markedly better — the home side concedes 2.86 goals per home match, whereas Mārupe concedes only 0.83 on the road; visitors have 50% clean sheets away, hosts 0% at home. Quality of chances also favors Mārupe: average xG away is 1.46 versus 0.88 xG for the hosts at home, and the visitors average 10.33 shots (4.83 on target) per game compared to Rēzekne’s 4.75 (3.5 on target). In the last 5 matches the hosts have just 0.2 points per game, 0 wins and have conceded 11 goals, while Mārupe has 1.2 points per game, 2 wins and scored 6 goals. Considering the defensive advantage (0.83 vs 2.86), higher xG (1.46 vs 0.88) and greater shot volume (10.33 vs 4.75), I predict an away win for Mārupe.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The league posts BTTS at 60% with an average of 3.43 goals per game, favoring matches with goals at both ends. Rēzekne has a seasonal BTTS rate of 57% and averages 2.0 goals scored and 2.0 conceded per match, while Mārupe records BTTS 33% with averages of 1.33 scored and 0.83 conceded. In the last 5 matches Rēzekne had BTTS 60% and conceded 2.2 goals on average (11 conceded in 5), and Mārupe had BTTS 40% and conceded 2.0 on average (10 conceded), which increases the likelihood of both teams scoring. xG and shot statistics are similar (xG 1.47 vs 1.46, avg. 10.5 vs 10.33 shots), and the home side shows higher finishing efficiency 21% vs 13%, so both sides are creating realistic chances. Considering the league’s 60% BTTS, the home side’s 100% Over2.5, and recent high goals conceded in the last 5, I select BTTS - Yes as the more probable outcome (70% vs 30%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The combined xG for both teams is 1.47 + 1.46 = 2.93, placing the match close to the 2.5 goals threshold and slightly below the league average of 3.43 goals per game. Rēzekne/BJSS records 100% of matches over 2.5 goals this season, while Mārupe has 50% — a strong signal in favor of Over 2.5, especially given the league-wide 68% Over 2.5 rate. The home side averages 10.5 shots with 4.67 on target and a 21% conversion rate; the visitors average 10.33 shots with 4.83 on target and a 13% conversion. Rēzekne’s superior finishing increases the likelihood that their 1.47 xG will convert into goals. Although Rēzekne have averaged only 0.8 goals and conceded 11 goals in their last five matches, the season-long home Over 2.5 rate (100%) and BTTS 57% indicate a high probability of goals from both sides. Based on this, I recommend the Over side on the 2.5 line as the best bet: combined xG 2.93, home season Over2.5 100% and league average 3.43 form the strongest and most value-driven signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Based on half-time statistics, the away team is more likely to hold the lead at the break: hosts were behind at half-time in 57% of matches and concede an average of 0.86 goals in the first half, whereas the away side concedes only 0.17 goals in that phase and keep a clean sheet at half-time in 83% of games. By full-time the away advantage remains visible: they have 50% wins this season versus 43% for the hosts and concede on average 0.83 goals over the season compared with 2.0 for the hosts, suggesting they will maintain the lead obtained by half-time. On the other hand the hosts score heavily after the break — averaging 1.57 goals in the second half and with 100% of their matches featuring at least one goal after half-time — so a turnaround (2/1 or X/1) is a realistic possibility. Given that the xG of both teams is practically equal (1.47 vs 1.46), the most likely scenario is the away team leading at half-time and holding the win to full-time (2/2), with the chance of the hosts overturning the deficit in the second half.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Rēzekne / BJSS | Mārupe | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 50% | 45% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.23 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.48 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Rēzekne / BJSS is 33% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Rēzekne / BJSS · 0.6 pts / match - Mārupe
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Mārupe is 119% better for: goals scored per match.
0.77 goals / match - Rēzekne / BJSS · 1.69 goals / match - Mārupe
Mārupe is 95% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.85 goals / match - Rēzekne / BJSS · 1.46 goals / match - Mārupe
Rēzekne / BJSS scores in 54% of matches (7 of 13 matches), while Mārupe keeps a clean sheet in 38% (5 of 13 matches).
Mārupe scores in 77% of matches (10 of 13 matches), while Rēzekne / BJSS keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Rēzekne / BJSS
Over / Under - Mārupe
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Mārupe is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.54 pts / match - Rēzekne / BJSS · 1.08 pts / match - Mārupe
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Rēzekne / BJSS - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 8%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Mārupe - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Rēzekne / BJSS
Mārupe
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Rēzekne / BJSS | Liga | Mārupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.62 | 3.45 | ▼ 3.15 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 54% | 62% | ▼ 46% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 69% | 67% | ▲ 77% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 22% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 77% | 72% | ▼ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 77% | 84% | ▲ 92% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Rēzekne / BJSS 1 - 1 - 1 Mārupe. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Rēzekne / BJSS vs Mārupe?
The 1. Liga match finished Rēzekne / BJSS 1:2 Mārupe. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Rēzekne / BJSS and Mārupe?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Rēzekne / BJSS won 1, Mārupe won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Rēzekne / BJSS vs Mārupe?
Rēzekne / BJSS score 0.77 goals per game on average and Mārupe 1.69. The 1. Liga average is 3.45 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Rēzekne / BJSS's matches and 46% of Mārupe's.
What form are Rēzekne / BJSS and Mārupe in?
Over the last 5 games Rēzekne / BJSS have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Mārupe 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rēzekne / BJSS vs Mārupe?
The statistical background for Rēzekne / BJSS vs Mārupe — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


